The Sensitivity and Specificity of Clinical Examination of the Hemodialysis Arterial-Venous Fistula (AVF) as Compared to Angiography

§ Pine (Partners in Nephrology and Endocrinology)
‡ PINE

Send Message

To: Author

The Sensitivity and Specificity of Clinical Examination of the Hemodialysis Arterial-Venous Fistula (AVF) as Compared to Angiography

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

KO1QF

The Sensitivity and Specificity of Clinical Examination of the Hemodialysis Arterial-Venous Fistula (AVF) as Compared to Angiography Banner

Key Research Insights

Synthesized scholarly intelligence & interactive research assistant
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scots Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sundanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu
Reading Preferences
Font Size
Line Spacing
Background
This converted HTML version may contain rendering inconsistencies. Please refer to the PDF for the authoritative version, or click here to provide feedback.

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Physical examination of the hemodialysis arterial-venous fistula (AVF) is convenient and inexpensive, and can often detect common problems associated with hemodialysis access. Routine systematic physical examination of the fistula by the dialysis staff with each treatment may allow early detection of problems that are commonly associated with mature fistula. This avoiding missed treatments and emergent situations. Dialysis access stenosis is the most common cause of access dysfunction. Physical examination is an important method in the assessment of stenotic lesions. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the two simple maneuvers in physical examination of the AVF (pulse augmentation and pressure assessment inside the fistula and collapsibility of the fistula on arm elevation) and compare them with the gold standard angiography.

References

16 Cites in Article
  1. 1. Gerald Beathard (1998). Physical Examination of the Dialysis Vascular Access. Seminars in Dialysis, 11(4), 231-236.
  2. 2. S Trerotola,P Scheel,Jr,N Powe (1996). Screening for dialysis access graft malfunction: comparison of physical examination with US. J Vasc Interv Radiol, 7, 15.
  3. 3. A Safa,K Valji,A Roberts (1996). Detection and treatment of dysfunctional hemodialysis access graft: effect of a surveillance program on graft patency and the incidence of thrombosis. Radiology, 199, 653.
  4. 4. Rino Migliacci,Maria Selli,Francesca Falcinelli,Lorenza Vandelli,Egidio Lusvarghi,Antonella Santucci,Giuseppe Nenci,Paolo Gresele (1999). Assessment of Occlusion of the Vascular Access in Patients on Chronic Hemodialysis: Comparison of Physical Examination with Continuous-Wave Doppler Ultrasound. Nephron, 82(1), 7-11.
  5. 5. Arif Asif,Carlos Leon,Luis Orozco-Vargas,Gururaj Krishnamurthy,Kenneth Choi,Carlos Mercado,Donna Merrill,Ian Thomas,Loay Salman,Shukhrat Artikov,Jacques Bourgoignie (2007). Accuracy of Physical Examination in the Detection of Arteriovenous Fistula Stenosis. Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, 2(6), 1191-1194.
  6. 6. G Beathard (2002). Physical examination: The forgotten tool. A Multidisciplinary Approach for Hemodialysis Access, 11-118.
  7. 7. Gerald Beathard (2005). An Algorithm for the Physical Examination of Early Fistula Failure. Seminars in Dialysis, 18(4), 331-335.
  8. 8. J Choi,Y Kim,S Yoon,Y Won (2006). Accuracy of physical examination in the detection of Arteriovenous fistula dysfunction. Korean J Nephrol, 25, 797-802.
  9. 9. A Asif,G Cherla,D Merrill,C Cipleu,P Briones,P Pennell (2005). Conversion of tunneled hemodialysis catheter-consigned patients to Arteriovenous fistula. Kidney Int, 67, 2399-2406.
  10. 10. (2006). Clinical Practice Guidelines for Vascular Access. American Journal of Kidney Diseases, 48(suppl 1), S248-S273.
  11. 11. (2001). NKF-DOQI clinical practice guidelines for vascular access: guideline 1-Patient evaluation prior to access placement. Am J Kidney Dis, 37, 141.
  12. 12. A Sidawy,L Spergel,A Besarab (2008). The Scociety for Vascular Surgery: clinical practice guidelines for surgical placement and maintenance of Arteriovenous hemodialysis access. J Vasc Surg, 48, 2S.
  13. 13. T Mcginn,P Wyer,T Newman,S Keitz (2004). Tips for learners of evidence-based medicine: 3. Measures of observer variability (kappa statistic). Canadian Medical Association Journal, 171(11), 1369-1373.
  14. 14. M Maclure,W Willett (1987). MISINTERPRETATION AND MISUSE OF THE KAPPA STATISTIC. American Journal of Epidemiology, 126(2), 161-169.
  15. 15. Jacob Cohen (1960). A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 37-46.
  16. 16. R Mishler,D Schon,B Hubert,A Nissenson (2000). Development and usefulness of a physical examination tool to diagnose vascular access dysfunction. J AM Soc Nephrol, 11, 190A.

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Awad Magbri, Eussera El-Magbri, Taha El-Magbri, Ji-Yank Sophie Lee. 2016. "The Sensitivity and Specificity of Clinical Examination of the Hemodialysis Arterial-Venous Fistula (AVF) as Compared to Angiography". Global Journal of Medical Research - F: Diseases GJMR-F Volume 16 (GJMR Volume 16 Issue F3).

More Citation Formats

Download Citation

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/gjmra

Print ISSN 0975-5888

e-ISSN 2249-4618

Keywords
Classification
GJMR-F Classification NLMC Code: WL141.5.C4
Version of record

v1.2

Issue date
July 4, 2016

Language
English
Order Article Reprint
Experience in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

Article Matrices
Total Views: 1.7K
Total Downloads: 137
All Trends

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

The Sensitivity and Specificity of Clinical Examination of the Hemodialysis Arterial-Venous Fistula (AVF) as Compared to Angiography

Awad Magbri
Awad Magbri <p>Pine (Partners in Nephrology and Endocrinology)</p>
Awad Magbri
Awad Magbri <p>PINE</p>
Eussera El-Magbri
Eussera El-Magbri
Taha El-Magbri
Taha El-Magbri
Ji-Yank Lee
Ji-Yank Lee