Toward a Sociology of Public Intellectual Action: The Challenge of the Molecular Intellectuals

α
Francesco Antonelli
Francesco Antonelli
α Roma Tre University Roma Tre University

Send Message

To: Author

Toward a Sociology of Public Intellectual Action: The Challenge of the Molecular Intellectuals

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

L3IUV

Toward a Sociology of Public Intellectual Action: The Challenge of the Molecular Intellectuals Banner

AI TAKEAWAY

Connecting with the Eternal Ground
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scots Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sundanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu

Abstract

The present essay aims to give both a contribution to rethinking sociology of intellectuals and to the study of transition from the hierarchical order of modernity (idea of Society) to a social pattern based on persons and subjects. In particular, we will try to paint a sketch of the transformations of the intellectual function. Exerted by big bureaucratic machines, today the intellectual action partially detaches itself from the intellectual function carried out by big bureaucratic machines of the modern era. New typologies of intellectuals were born as well as a new, deeply ambivalent public space. The Internet and networked individualism are the main carriers of these transformations.

References

49 Cites in Article
  1. T Adorno,M Horkheimer (1972). The dialectic of Enlightenment.
  2. C Anderson (2005). The Long Tail: Why the Future of Business is Selling Less of More.
  3. F Antonelli (2009). La modernità in transito. Movimenti sociali, élites e trasformazioni collettive nella sociologia di Alain Touraine.
  4. F Antonelli (2012). Da élite a sciame. Gli intellettuali-pubblici dalla società industriale al mondo globale.
  5. F Antonelli,R Castrucci (2009). La lunga coda della transizione italiana: pubblici molecolari e trasformazioni delle élites.
  6. R Aron (1957). The Oppium of the intellectuals.
  7. Asor Rosa,A (2009). Il grande silenzio. Intervista sugli intellettuali.
  8. Z Bauman (1987). Legislators and Interpreters.
  9. Z Bauman (1991). Modernity and Ambivalence.
  10. J Bone (2005). The Social Map & The Problem of Order: A Re-evaluation of "Homo Sociologicus.
  11. P Bourdieu (1979). The Inheritors: French Students and Their Relations to Culture.
  12. P Bourdieu (1990). Home Academicus.
  13. P Bourdieu (1991). Language and Symbolic Power.
  14. F Berardi (2004). Il sapiente, il mercante e il guerriero: dal rifiuto del lavoro all'emergere del cognitariato.
  15. (1986). The Knowledge Society.
  16. Michael Burawoy (2005). For Public Sociology.
  17. J Burnham (1941). The Managerial Revolution: What is Happening in the World.
  18. C Canta (2006). Ricostruire la società. Teoria del mutamento sociale in Karl Mannheim.
  19. M Castells (2003). The Internet Galaxy: Reflections on the Internet, Business and Society.
  20. Manuel Castells (2008). The Rise of the Network Society.
  21. R Castrucci (2006). Il lavoro immateriale e la produzione di merci.
  22. R Castrucci (2009). Il paradosso della classe creativa.
  23. S Cubitt (2005). Ecomedia.
  24. Ralf Dahrendorf (2006). Versuchungen der Unfreiheit.
  25. L De Biase (2007). Economia della felicità.
  26. Van Dijk (2006). The Network Society: Social Aspects of New Media.
  27. R Florida (2002). The Rise of the Creative Class: and how it's Transforming Work, Leisure, Community and Everyday Life.
  28. C Formenti (2008). Cybersoviet. Utopie postdemocratiche e nuovi media.
  29. C Fuchs (2008). Internet and Society: Social Theory in the Information Age.
  30. F Furedi (2004). Where Have All the Intellectuals Gone.
  31. A Giddens (1984). The Constitution of Society. Outline of the Theory of Structuration.
  32. A Giddens (1990). The Consequences of Modernity.
  33. A Gramsci (1930). Quaderni del carcere. Gli intellettuali e l'organizzazione della cultura.
  34. J Habermas (1989). The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a category of Bourgeois Society.
  35. R Inglehart (1998). Modernization and Postmodernization: Cultural, Economic and Political Change in 43 Society.
  36. P Lévy (1994). L'intelligence collective.
  37. K Mannheim,E Shils (1980). Men and Society in an Age of Reconstruction: Studies in Modern Social Structure.
  38. K Marx (1998). The German Ideology.
  39. J Rifkin (2000). The Age of Access: the New Culture of Hypercapitalism, where all ofLlife is aPaid-for Experience.
  40. J Rifkin (1995). The End of Work: the Decline of the Global Labor Force and the Dawn of the Post-Market Era.
  41. Helena Rimon,Ron Schleifer (2013). Who Will Guard the Guardians? Introduction to the Special Issue on the Intellectuals and Terror: A Fatal Attraction.
  42. (2003). The Blackwell Companion to Major Contemporary Social Theorists.
  43. R Sennett (1977). The Fall of Public Man.
  44. N Sther,V Meja (2005). Society and Knowledge: Contemporany Perspectives in the Sociology of Knowledge and Science.
  45. D Tapscott,A Williams (2008). Wikinomics. How Mass Collaboration Changes Everything.
  46. A Touraine (1970). <bold>Social Welfare: Values, Means, and Ends</bold>. By Donald S. Howard. New York: Random House, 1969. 467 pp. $8.50.
  47. A Touraine (2007). New Paradigm for Understanding Today's World.
  48. A Touraine (2007). Penser autrement.
  49. G Vattimo,P Rovatti (1985). Il pensiero debole.

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Francesco Antonelli. 2013. \u201cToward a Sociology of Public Intellectual Action: The Challenge of the Molecular Intellectuals\u201d. Global Journal of Human-Social Science - C: Sociology & Culture GJHSS-C Volume 13 (GJHSS Volume 13 Issue C6): .

Download Citation

Issue Cover
GJHSS Volume 13 Issue C6
Pg. 21- 28
Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJHSS

Print ISSN 0975-587X

e-ISSN 2249-460X

Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

November 13, 2013

Language
en
Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

Article Matrices
Total Views: 4997
Total Downloads: 2496
2026 Trends
Related Research

Published Article

The present essay aims to give both a contribution to rethinking sociology of intellectuals and to the study of transition from the hierarchical order of modernity (idea of Society) to a social pattern based on persons and subjects. In particular, we will try to paint a sketch of the transformations of the intellectual function. Exerted by big bureaucratic machines, today the intellectual action partially detaches itself from the intellectual function carried out by big bureaucratic machines of the modern era. New typologies of intellectuals were born as well as a new, deeply ambivalent public space. The Internet and networked individualism are the main carriers of these transformations.

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

Quote and Order Details

Contact Person

Invoice Address

Notes or Comments

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

Toward a Sociology of Public Intellectual Action: The Challenge of the Molecular Intellectuals

Francesco Antonelli
Francesco Antonelli Roma Tre University

Research Journals