Towards Parsimony in Terminology used in the Value Creating Process for Sources of Sustainable Competitive Advantage: The Activity-Resource-Based View (ARBV) Perspective

Towards Parsimony in Terminology used in the Value Creating Process for Sources of Sustainable Competitive Advantage: The Activity-Resource-Based View (ARBV) Perspective

Dr. Hanningtone Gaya PhD

Contact

Dr. Hanningtone Gaya

Contact

Riara University

Towards Parsimony in Terminology used in the Value Creating Process for Sources of Sustainable Competitive Advantage: The Activity-Resource-Based View (ARBV) Perspective

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

92273

AI TAKEAWAY

Connecting with the Eternal Ground

Abstract

This paper promotes the need for parsimony in terminology used in the actual value creating process for sources of sustainable competitive advantage by advocating for the need to have universally accepted definitions of the terms resources, capabilities and competencies. This urgent need for an explicit distinction of terminology is supported by recent literature. Specifically, this paper also advocates for the activity-resource-based view (ARBV), derived by integrating the activity and resource-based views, to be one of the main frameworks for analysing the actual value creation process for firms in the services industry. The paper also contributes to the bridging of the gap in strategic management literature and offers guidance for future research by urging scholars and researchers to embrace the empirical integration of the activity and resource-based views.

References

59 Cites in Article

Reference Format

C Armstrong,K Shimizu (2007). A review of approaches to empirical research on the resourcebased view of the firm.
Jay Barney (1986). Strategic factor markets: expectations, luck, and business strategy.
J Barney (2001). Is the resource-based "view" a useful perspective for strategic management research? Yes.
Jay Barney,Asli Arikan (2001). The Resource‐based View.
J Barney,M Wright,D Ketchen (2001). The resource-based view of the firm: Ten years after 1991.
J Creswell (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches.
Jerker Denrell,Christina Fang,Sidney Winter (2003). The economics of strategic opportunity.
(2011). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research.
M Easterby-Smith,R Thorpe,P Jackson (2009). Management Research.
Kathleen Eisenhardt (1989). Building Theories from Case Study Research.
K Eisenhardt,M Graebner (2007). Theory building from cases: opportunities and challenges.
J Fahy (2000). The resource-based view of the firm: Some stumbling-blocks on the road to understanding sustainable competitive advantage.
Nicolai Foss,Thorbjørn Knudsen (2003). The resource‐based tangle: towards a sustainable explanation of competitive advantage.
H Gaya,M Struwig,E Smith (2013). Creating a sustainable competitive advantage at a high performing firm in Kenya.
H Gaya,E Smith (2016). Developing a qualitative single case study in the strategic management realm: An appropriate research design.
J Fahy (2002). A resource-based analysis of sustainable competitive advantage in a global environment.
H Gaya,M Struwig (2016). Is activity-resourcebased-view (ARBV) the new theory of the firm for creating sources of sustainable competitive advantage in services firms?.
P Ghemawat (2008). Strategy and the Business Landscape.
Michael Gibbert,Winfried Ruigrok,Barbara Wicki (2008). What passes as a rigorous case study?.
R Grant (2010). Contemporary strategy analysis.
A Haberberg,A Rieple (2008). Strategic management: Theory and application.
Cwl Hill,G Jones (2009). The teaching of civics. By Mabel Hill. Boston: Houghton, Mifflin Co..
M Hitt,R Ireland,R Hoskisson (2007). Strategic management: competitiveness and globalization.
D Hoopes,T Madsen,G Walker (2003). Guest editors' introduction to the special issue: Why is there a resource-based view? Toward a theory of competitive heterogeneity.
N Hyett,A Kenny,V Dickson-Swift (2014). Unknown Title.
J Kraaijenbrink,J Spender,A Groen (2010). The resource-based view: A review and assessment of its critiques.
A Lockett,S Thompson,U Morgenstern (2009). The development of the resource-based view of the firm: A critical appraisal.
S Merriam (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education.
S Merriam (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (3rd ed).
Scott Newbert (2007). Empirical research on the resource‐based view of the firm: an assessment and suggestions for future research.
J Pearce,R Robinson (2011). Strategic management: formulation, implementation and control of competitive strategy.
Margaret Peteraf,Jay Barney (2003). Unraveling The Resource-Based Tangle.
Margaret Peteraf,Mark Bergen (2003). Scanning dynamic competitive landscapes: a market‐based and resource‐based framework.
M Porter (1991). Towards a dynamic theory of strategy.
M Porter (2004). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance.
M Porter (2008). The five competitive forces that shape strategy.
R Priem,J Butler (2001). Is the resource-based "view" a useful perspective for strategic management research?.
R Priem (2007). A consumer perspective of value creation.
Gautam Ray,Jay Barney,Waleed Muhanna (2004). Capabilities, business processes, and competitive advantage: choosing the dependent variable in empirical tests of the resource‐based view.
M Rouse,U Daellenbach (2002). More thinking on research methods for the resourcebased perspective.
Richard Rumelt (1984). Towards a strategic theory of the firm.
Richard Rumelt (1991). How much does industry matter?.
R Sanchez (2008). A scientific critique of the resource-based view (RBV) in strategy theory, with competence based remedies for the RBV's conceptual deficiencies and logic problems.
T Scandura,E Williams (2000). RESEARCH METHODOLOGY IN MANAGEMENT: CURRENT PRACTICES, TRENDS, AND IMPLICATIONS FOR FUTURE RESEARCH..
N Sheehan,N Foss (2007). Enhancing the prescriptiveness of the resource-based view through Porterian activity analysis.
Norman Sheehan,Nicolai Foss (2009). Exploring the roots of Porter's activity‐based view.
David Sirmon,Michael Hitt,R Ireland (2007). Managing Firm Resources in Dynamic Environments to Create Value: Looking Inside the Black Box.
N Siggelkow (2007). Persuasion with case studies.
Yiannis Spanos,Spyros Lioukas (2001). An examination into the causal logic of rent generation: Contrasting Porter's competitive strategy framework and the resource-based perspective.
R Stake (1995). The art of case study research.
R Stake (1978). Case study method: key issues, key texts.
R Stake (2005). Qualitative case studies.
A Thompson,M Peteraf,J Gamble,A Strickland (2012). Crafting and Executing Strategy: Concepts and Cases.
Birger Wernerfelt (1984). A resource‐based view of the firm.
Birger Wernerfelt (1995). The resource‐based view of the firm: Ten years after.
R Yin (2002). Case study research: Design and methods.
R Yin (2009). Case study research: Design and methods.
R Yin (2012). Applications of case study research.
A Zubac,G Hubbard,W Johnson (2010). The RBV and value creation: a managerial perspective.

Download References

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Dr. Hanningtone Gaya PhD. 2016. \u201cTowards Parsimony in Terminology used in the Value Creating Process for Sources of Sustainable Competitive Advantage: The Activity-Resource-Based View (ARBV) Perspective\u201d. Global Journal of Management and Business Research - A: Administration & Management GJMBR-A Volume 16 (GJMBR Volume 16 Issue A7): .

More Citation Formats

Select Citation Style:

Download Citation

Download Article

GJMBR Volume 16 Issue A7
Pg. 31- 42

Explore Journals Explore Volume Read This Issue

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJMBR

Print ISSN 0975-5853

e-ISSN 2249-4588

Keywords

Not Found

Classification

GJMBR-A Classification: JEL Code: M10

Submission ReceivedDecember 11, 2015
Peer Review Double Blind
Handling Editor
Accepted January 4, 2016
Published January 15, 2016

Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

August 17, 2016

Language

Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

View in VR

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

View in 3D

Article Matrices

Total Score: 106

Country: Kenya

Subject: Global Journal of Management and Business Research - A: Administration & Management

Authors: Dr. Hanningtone Gaya (PhD/Dr. count: 1)

View Count (all-time): 148

Total Views (Real + Logic): 3622

Total Downloads (simulated): 1968

Publish Date: 2016 08, Wed

Monthly Totals (Real + Logic):

Month 1: 41 views
Month 2: 40 views
Month 3: 33 views
Month 4: 35 views
Month 5: 24 views
Month 6: 29 views
Month 7: 33 views
Month 8: 42 views
Month 9: 52 views
Month 10: 34 views
Month 11: 46 views
Month 12: 30 views
Month 13: 43 views
Month 14: 27 views
Month 15: 24 views
Month 16: 29 views
Month 17: 37 views
Month 18: 27 views
Month 19: 42 views
Month 20: 29 views
Month 21: 19 views
Month 22: 20 views
Month 23: 20 views
Month 24: 26 views
Month 25: 24 views
Month 26: 40 views
Month 27: 31 views
Month 28: 27 views
Month 29: 29 views
Month 30: 39 views
Month 31: 24 views
Month 32: 23 views
Month 33: 17 views
Month 34: 33 views
Month 35: 29 views
Month 36: 41 views
Month 37: 25 views
Month 38: 28 views
Month 39: 27 views
Month 40: 17 views
Month 41: 39 views
Month 42: 39 views
Month 43: 46 views
Month 44: 17 views
Month 45: 26 views
Month 46: 23 views
Month 47: 23 views
Month 48: 30 views
Month 49: 38 views
Month 50: 35 views
Month 51: 30 views
Month 52: 26 views
Month 53: 27 views
Month 54: 19 views
Month 55: 37 views
Month 56: 38 views
Month 57: 38 views
Month 58: 26 views
Month 59: 22 views
Month 60: 34 views
Month 61: 24 views
Month 62: 28 views
Month 63: 32 views
Month 64: 25 views
Month 65: 19 views
Month 66: 39 views
Month 67: 42 views
Month 68: 29 views
Month 69: 26 views
Month 70: 16 views
Month 71: 19 views
Month 72: 32 views
Month 73: 44 views
Month 74: 24 views
Month 75: 37 views
Month 76: 27 views
Month 77: 43 views
Month 78: 40 views
Month 79: 24 views
Month 80: 22 views
Month 81: 38 views
Month 82: 35 views
Month 83: 32 views
Month 84: 38 views
Month 85: 22 views
Month 86: 36 views
Month 87: 16 views
Month 88: 21 views
Month 89: 23 views
Month 90: 31 views
Month 91: 27 views
Month 92: 27 views
Month 93: 26 views
Month 94: 34 views
Month 95: 42 views
Month 96: 35 views
Month 97: 31 views
Month 98: 43 views
Month 99: 12 views
Month 100: 34 views
Month 101: 35 views
Month 102: 27 views
Month 103: 47 views
Month 104: 24 views
Month 105: 29 views
Month 106: 25 views
Month 107: 27 views
Month 108: 20 views
Month 109: 23 views
Month 110: 12 views
Month 111: 21 views
Month 112: 26 views
Month 113: 33 views
Month 114: 24 views
Month 115: 35 views
Month 116: 36 views
Month 117: 23 views

Total Views: 3622

Total Downloads: 1968

2026 Trends

Published Article

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]