Trade and Income Distribution in Pakistan

1
Zeba Amjad
Zeba Amjad M.phil(Economics) Research Continue
1 BZU University Multan

Send Message

To: Author

GJMBR Volume 15 Issue B8

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

N35AN

Trade and Income Distribution in Pakistan Banner
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scots Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sundanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu

This study analyses the fact that trade and income distribution. The objective of the study is to investigate the impact of trade on income distribution in Pakistan. This study shows that trade increases income inequality using time series analysis from Pakistan empirical analysis. In this study a little attention is given to the theories regarding income distribution. The data is processed from 1980 to 2010 an OLS technique is used to get results. Gini coefficient is used as a measure of income inequality. The results found shoes that trade has negative impact on income distribution and income inequality is negatively affected by remittances, and GDP but population growth has negative impact on income inequality.

23 Cites in Articles

References

  1. S Aradhyula,T Rahman,K Seenivasan (2007). Impact of international trade on income and income inequality.
  2. F Bouruignon,K Morrisson (1990). Income Distribution, Development and Foreign Trade.
  3. Imran Chaudhry,Sharif (2013). Does Trade Liberalization reduce Poverty and Inequality? Empirical Evidence from Pakistan.
  4. Giovanni Cornia (2003). The Impact of Liberalisation and Globalisation on Income Inequality in Developing and Transitional Economies.
  5. David Dollar,Aart Kraay (2002). Growth is Good for the Poor.
  6. Ronald Fischer (2001). The evolution of inequality after trade liberalization.
  7. Nuzhat Falki (2009). Impact of Foreign Direct Investment on Economic Growth in Pakistan.
  8. C Gini (1912). Italian: Variabilità e mutabilità" 'Variability and Mutability.
  9. Jackobsson (2006). Trade Openness and Income Inequality School of Economics and Management.
  10. S Kahai,W Simmons (2005). The impact of globalization on income inequality.
  11. Rana Khan,Ali,Rashid Sattar (2010). Trade Growth and Poverty: A Case of Pakistan.
  12. Sehar Munir,Adiqa Kiani (1972). Relationship between Trade Openness and Inflation: Empirical Evidences from Pakistan (1976-2010)..
  13. Elena Meschi,Marco Vivarelli (2009). Trade and Income Inequality in Developing Countries.
  14. Amelia Paulino,A Santos,Thirlwall (2004). THE IMPACT OF TRADE LIBERALISATION ON EXPORTS, IMPORTS AND THE BALANCE OF PAYMENTS OF DEVELOPING COUNTRIES.
  15. Elena Meschi,Marco Vivarelli (2009). Trade and Income Inequality in Developing Countries.
  16. Jai Mah (2002). The impact of globalization on income distribution: the Korean experience.
  17. R Siddiqui,Z Iqbal (2001). Tariff Reduction and Functional Income Distribution in Pakistan: A CGE Model.
  18. Antonio Spilimbergo,Juan Londoño,Miguel Székely (1999). Income distribution, factor endowments, and trade openness.
  19. Andreas Savvides (1998). Trade policy and income inequality: new evidence.
  20. Antonio Spilimbergo,Juan Londoño,Miguel Székely (2012). Income distribution, factor endowments, and trade openness.
  21. Usman Qadir,Muhammad Kemal,Hasan Mohsin (2000). Impact of Trade Reforms on Poverty.
  22. R William,Cline (1999). Unknown Title.
  23. R Paul (2006). Economics (International Edition).

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

Zeba Amjad. 2015. \u201cTrade and Income Distribution in Pakistan\u201d. Global Journal of Management and Business Research - B: Economic & Commerce GJMBR-B Volume 15 (GJMBR Volume 15 Issue B8): .

Download Citation

Issue Cover
GJMBR Volume 15 Issue B8
Pg. 19- 25
Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJMBR

Print ISSN 0975-5853

e-ISSN 2249-4588

Keywords
Classification
GJMBR-B Classification: JEL Code: F19
Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

October 8, 2015

Language

English

Experiance in AR

The methods for personal identification and authentication are no exception.

Read in 3D

The methods for personal identification and authentication are no exception.

Article Matrices
Total Views: 4088
Total Downloads: 2125
2026 Trends
Research Identity (RIN)
Related Research

Published Article

This study analyses the fact that trade and income distribution. The objective of the study is to investigate the impact of trade on income distribution in Pakistan. This study shows that trade increases income inequality using time series analysis from Pakistan empirical analysis. In this study a little attention is given to the theories regarding income distribution. The data is processed from 1980 to 2010 an OLS technique is used to get results. Gini coefficient is used as a measure of income inequality. The results found shoes that trade has negative impact on income distribution and income inequality is negatively affected by remittances, and GDP but population growth has negative impact on income inequality.

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]
×

This Page is Under Development

We are currently updating this article page for a better experience.

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

Quote and Order Details

Contact Person

Invoice Address

Notes or Comments

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

Trade and Income Distribution in Pakistan

Zeba Amjad
Zeba Amjad BZU University Multan

Research Journals