Two Theoretical Approaches to Power: Coloniality and Cosmopolitism

1
altivohaciaadelante
altivohaciaadelante
2
Willy Soto Acosta
Willy Soto Acosta
1 Universidad Nacional (Costa Rica)

Send Message

To: Author

GJHSS Volume 13 Issue C6

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

37F0H

Two Theoretical Approaches to Power: Coloniality and Cosmopolitism Banner
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scots Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sundanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu

The article compares two approaches that attempt to explain the socio-economic events and policy within states and global society: the Coloniality of Power and Cosmopolitanism. The article reconstructs the discourse of both of these theoretical perspectives to continue next with an assessment of their strengths and weaknesses. In a third stage, the article compares the commonalities and disagreements between the two. We conclude that the two paradigms make significant contributions, and that the social researcher has the important challenge of articulating both of them coherentlyin order to account for a concrete reality.

16 Cites in Articles

References

  1. Ulrich Beck (1988). ¿Qué es la globalización? Falacias del globalismo, respuestas a la globalización.
  2. Ulrich Bech (1988). DISCUSIONES SOBRE EL RIESGO EN LA SOCIEDAD DEL RIESGO..
  3. Rafael Silva Ramírez (2000). Responsabilidad social empresarial estratégica: una mirada desde la teoría de la sociedad del Riesgo Mundial de Ulrich Beck..
  4. Ulrich Beck (2004). Poder y contra poder en la era global.
  5. Ulrick Beck (2008). La reinvención de la política: hacia una teoría de la modernización reflexiva.
  6. Gerard Delanty (2008). La imaginación cosmopolita‖.
  7. De La Torre,Verónica (2022). Las pruebas son claras: los embarazos no intencionales guardan relación con la falta de desarrollo.
  8. Ramón Grosfoguel (2006). La descolonización de la economía política y los estudios postcoloniales: transmodernidad, pensamiento fronterizo y colonialidad global.
  9. Jean-Marie Guéhenno (1995). LAS NUEVAS “REGLAS DEL JUEGO”..
  10. Jurgen Habermas (1998). -Ciudadanía e identidad nacional. Reflexiones sobre el futuro europeo‖.
  11. Martha Nussbaum (1999). Los límites del patriotismo: Identidad, pertenencia y -ciudadanía mundial‖.
  12. Oscar Pérez (2006). Algunas estrategias para la virtud cosmopolita‖.
  13. Anibal Quijano (2000). Colonialidad del poder y clasificación social‖.
  14. Anibal Quijano (2000). Colonialidad del poder, globalización y democracia‖.
  15. Pablo Quintero (2010). Notas sobre la teoría de la colonialidad del poder y la estructuración de la sociedad en América Latina.
  16. Hugo Méndez-Fierros,Christian Fernández Huerta,Isaac Palazuelos Rojo (2010). Memes, migración y discurso de odio en la frontera México-Estados Unidos de Norteamérica. Una propuesta etnográfica digital.

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

altivohaciaadelante. 2013. \u201cTwo Theoretical Approaches to Power: Coloniality and Cosmopolitism\u201d. Global Journal of Human-Social Science - C: Sociology & Culture GJHSS-C Volume 13 (GJHSS Volume 13 Issue C6): .

Download Citation

Issue Cover
GJHSS Volume 13 Issue C6
Pg. 29- 35
Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJHSS

Print ISSN 0975-587X

e-ISSN 2249-460X

Classification
Not Found
Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

November 13, 2013

Language

English

Experiance in AR

The methods for personal identification and authentication are no exception.

Read in 3D

The methods for personal identification and authentication are no exception.

Article Matrices
Total Views: 4638
Total Downloads: 2339
2026 Trends
Research Identity (RIN)
Related Research

Published Article

The article compares two approaches that attempt to explain the socio-economic events and policy within states and global society: the Coloniality of Power and Cosmopolitanism. The article reconstructs the discourse of both of these theoretical perspectives to continue next with an assessment of their strengths and weaknesses. In a third stage, the article compares the commonalities and disagreements between the two. We conclude that the two paradigms make significant contributions, and that the social researcher has the important challenge of articulating both of them coherentlyin order to account for a concrete reality.

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]
×

This Page is Under Development

We are currently updating this article page for a better experience.

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

Quote and Order Details

Contact Person

Invoice Address

Notes or Comments

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

Two Theoretical Approaches to Power: Coloniality and Cosmopolitism

Willy Soto Acosta
Willy Soto Acosta

Research Journals