Underlying Paradigms of Community Development: HRD Perspectives

Underlying Paradigms of Community Development: HRD Perspectives

Mr. Hasanuzzaman Tushar Ph.D. Candidate MBA

Contact

Hassan Miushad

Contact

α International University of Business Agriculture and Technology

Underlying Paradigms of Community Development: HRD Perspectives

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

3ZU7R

Underlying Paradigms of Community Development: HRD Perspectives Banner

AI TAKEAWAY

Connecting with the Eternal Ground

Abstract

The field of human resource development (HRD) is evolving and the scope is getting wider. Today community development is becoming a popular topic which is explored in the context of HRD. Community development and HRD are two fields which emerged from multiple disciplines, and it is inherently needed to explore by multiple paradigms. This paper aims to present a critical literature review on different philosophical paradigms of community development in the context of HRD. A recent literature review demonstrated that action research is the most popular research method used in community development; hence, action research is discussed from episteme-ological point of view. In addition, critical theory, feminist theory, and race theory were discussed to explore the paradigms in relation to community development and HRD.

References

38 Cites in Article

Reference Format

M Aguinaga,M Lang,D Mokrani,A Santillana (2013). In search of an alternative development paradigm: feminist proposals from Latin America.
J Bhattacharyya (2004). Theorizing community development.
L Bierema (2002). A feminist approach to HRD research.
Laura Bierema (2009). Critiquing Human Resource Development's Dominant Masculine Rationality and Evaluating Its Impact.
D Brokensha,P Hodge (1969). Community Development; An Interpretation.
Mary Brydon-Miller,Davydd Greenwood,Patricia Maguire (2003). Why Action Research?.
Nadir Budhwani,Gary Mclean (2012). Community and Societal Development.
Alison Cerezo,Benedict Mcwhirter,Diana Peña,Marina Valdez,Cristina Bustos (2013). Giving Voice: Utilizing Critical Race Theory to Facilitate Consciousness of Racial Identity for Latina/o College Students.
B Cooke,Wolfram Cox,J (2005). Fundamentals of action research (4 volumes).
N Cranford (2010). Difference between positivist, interpretive and critical sociology.
(2011). Feminist Community Research.
R Delgado,J Stefancic (2012). Critical race theory: An introduction.
Lena Dominelli (2002). Contextualising Feminist Social Work Theory and Practice.
A Enno (2012). The intersection of multiple oppressed identities implications for identity development.
Wendy Frisby,Patricia Maguire,Colleen Reid (2009). The `f' word has everything to do with it.
D Held (1980). Introduction to critical theory: Horkheimer to Habermas.
Brent Muirhead,J Skelton (2010). College Writing Rubrics.
A Hurt,S Lynham,G Mclean (2014). Investigating the HRD cube and explicating extant paradigms of HRD.
A Jagose (2004). Queer theory: An introduction.
P Johnson,J Duberley (2000). Understanding management research: An introduction to epistemology.
N Kim (2012). Societal Development through human resource development contexts and key change agents.
N Kim,S Park,G Mclean (2009). A review of company-sponsored training programs for women employees.
A Kuiper (2014). The role of human resource development in the poverty zone in north Minneapolis in Minnesota: a case study.
Margaret Ledwith (2011). Community development (second edition).
J Lorber (1997). The variety of feminisms and their contributions to gender equality.
Greg Macleod (2014). Action Research for community business development.
Gary Mclean (2006). National Human Resource Development: A Focused Study in Transitioning Societies in the Developing World.
G Mclean,L Mclean (2001). If we can't define HRD in one country, how can we define it in an international context?.
Dawisa Sritanyarat,Darlene Russ-Eft (2016). Empirical Evaluation Indicators in Thai Higher Education: Theory-Based Multidimensional Learners’ Assessment.
Gary Mclean,Min-Hsin (christine) Kuo,Nadir Budhwani,Siriporn Yamnill,Busaya Virakul (2012). Capacity Building for Societal Development.
Gary Mclean,Min-Hsin (christine) Kuo,Nadir Budhwani,Siriporn Yamnill,Busaya Virakul (2006). Capacity Building for Societal Development.
W Potipiroon,D Sritanyarat,G Mclean (2006). Epistemology in Thailand: How Do We Know What We Know in HROD?.
Hilary Bradbury (2001). Action Research – Participative Self in Transformative Action.
Ronald Mancoske (2011). Asset Building and Community Development (2nd ed.), by Green, G. P., & Haines, A..
Christopher Sonn,Amy Quayle (2013). Developing Praxis: Mobilising Critical Race Theory in Community Cultural Development.
Richard Swanson (1995). Human resource development: Performance is the key.
R Swanson (2005). The process of framing research in organizations.
Joe Kincheloe,Peter Mclaren (2002). Rethinking Critical Theory and Qualitative Research.

Download References

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Mr. Hasanuzzaman Tushar. 2018. \u201cUnderlying Paradigms of Community Development: HRD Perspectives\u201d. Global Journal of Management and Business Research - A: Administration & Management GJMBR-A Volume 18 (GJMBR Volume 18 Issue A6): .

More Citation Formats

Select Citation Style:

Download Citation

Download Article

GJMBR Volume 18 Issue A6
Pg. 27- 34

Explore Journals Explore Volume Read This Issue

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJMBR

Print ISSN 0975-5853

e-ISSN 2249-4588

Keywords

Not Found

Classification

GJMBR-A Classification: JEL Code: M10

Submission ReceivedDecember 12, 2017
Peer Review Double Blind
Handling Editor
Accepted January 4, 2018
Published January 15, 2018

Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

July 24, 2018

Language

Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

View in VR

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

View in 3D

Article Matrices

Total Score: 102

Country: Unknown

Subject: Global Journal of Management and Business Research - A: Administration & Management

Authors: Mr. Hasanuzzaman Tushar, Hassan Miushad (PhD/Dr. count: 0)

View Count (all-time): 119

Total Views (Real + Logic): 3027

Total Downloads (simulated): 1446

Publish Date: 2018 07, Tue

Monthly Totals (Real + Logic):

Month 1: 18 views
Month 2: 57 views
Month 3: 57 views
Month 4: 21 views
Month 5: 52 views
Month 6: 29 views
Month 7: 30 views
Month 8: 50 views
Month 9: 50 views
Month 10: 34 views
Month 11: 44 views
Month 12: 23 views
Month 13: 47 views
Month 14: 18 views
Month 15: 18 views
Month 16: 18 views
Month 17: 36 views
Month 18: 40 views
Month 19: 19 views
Month 20: 36 views
Month 21: 27 views
Month 22: 36 views
Month 23: 42 views
Month 24: 27 views
Month 25: 37 views
Month 26: 18 views
Month 27: 28 views
Month 28: 20 views
Month 29: 21 views
Month 30: 30 views
Month 31: 43 views
Month 32: 28 views
Month 33: 16 views
Month 34: 14 views
Month 35: 36 views
Month 36: 25 views
Month 37: 20 views
Month 38: 23 views
Month 39: 41 views
Month 40: 36 views
Month 41: 25 views
Month 42: 28 views
Month 43: 33 views
Month 44: 22 views
Month 45: 39 views
Month 46: 32 views
Month 47: 46 views
Month 48: 47 views
Month 49: 12 views
Month 50: 38 views
Month 51: 19 views
Month 52: 46 views
Month 53: 21 views
Month 54: 32 views
Month 55: 18 views
Month 56: 39 views
Month 57: 30 views
Month 58: 13 views
Month 59: 32 views
Month 60: 45 views
Month 61: 36 views
Month 62: 23 views
Month 63: 26 views
Month 64: 41 views
Month 65: 19 views
Month 66: 29 views
Month 67: 15 views
Month 68: 25 views
Month 69: 30 views
Month 70: 26 views
Month 71: 29 views
Month 72: 28 views
Month 73: 31 views
Month 74: 31 views
Month 75: 29 views
Month 76: 27 views
Month 77: 42 views
Month 78: 25 views
Month 79: 40 views
Month 80: 25 views
Month 81: 19 views
Month 82: 26 views
Month 83: 38 views
Month 84: 31 views
Month 85: 50 views
Month 86: 41 views
Month 87: 32 views
Month 88: 21 views
Month 89: 26 views
Month 90: 41 views
Month 91: 84 views
Month 92: 29 views
Month 93: 42 views

Total Views: 3027

Total Downloads: 1446

2026 Trends

Published Article

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]