Use of Remote Sensing and Gamma Ray Spectrometric Data for Elucidating Radioactive Mineralized Zones, Wadi Jararah-Wadi Kharit Area, South Eastern Desert, Egypt

Use of Remote Sensing and Gamma Ray Spectrometric Data for Elucidating Radioactive Mineralized Zones, Wadi Jararah-Wadi Kharit Area, South Eastern Desert, Egypt

Abdelmohsen G. Nady

Contact

Reda E. El Arafy

Contact

Mohammad G. Al-Ibiary

Contact

Maysa M. Nabeh

Contact

Samah S. Abdeen

Contact

Use of Remote Sensing and Gamma Ray Spectrometric Data for Elucidating Radioactive Mineralized Zones, Wadi Jararah-Wadi Kharit Area, South Eastern Desert, Egypt

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

CAPF7

AI TAKEAWAY

Connecting with the Eternal Ground

Abstract

Wadi Jararah-Wadi Kharit is considered a large area located in the southeastern desert of Egypt with approximately 38,000 Km2 coverage extensions. The geologic outcrops of the area show a wide range of stratigraphic rock units from Precambrian to Quaternary. The detection of litho logic surface coverage units and their relationships to the high-radioactivity zones and its characterizations are the main tasks of this article. An integration between airborne Gamma-ray spectrometric data and Landsat 8 Operational Land Imager (OLI) satellite image has been used to determine and highlight the main radioactive zones covering the entire area of investigation; in addition to the relationship between airborne radioactive detected zones and their different kinds of related geologic alterations. The radioelement concentration values of the equivalent Uranium (eU), equivalent Thorium (eTh), and Potassium (K) successively discriminated several distinctive radioactive zones over Wadi Jararah-Wadi Kharit area. Fifteen main groups of statistically significant (anomalous) zones have been distinguished and show localities that represent uraniferous anomalous zones which could considered as a possible target of interest for ground follow-up investigation.

References

26 Cites in Article

Reference Format

A Ariza (2013). Descripción y Corrección de Productos Landsat 8 LDCM (Landsat Data Continuity Mission).
M Arunachalam,A Udhayaraj,A Jacob,V Narenprabakaran,M Vasanth,J Saravanavel (2014). Call for Papers-Theme Issue “Global Land Cover Mapping and Monitoring: Progress, Challenges, and opportunities”.
H Aryanmehr,M Hosseinjanizadeh,M Honarmand,F Naser (2018). Hydrothermal alterations mapping using Quickbird and Landsat-8 data, a case study from Babbiduyeh, Kerman province, Iran.
(1984). Airborne gamma-ray spectrometer and magnetometer survey Coos Bay, Oregon. Final report.
(null). Arc welding equipment.
P Chiozzi,V Pasquale,M Verdoya (1998). Ground radiometric survey of U, Th and K on the Lipari Island, Italy.
S Saleh,W Saleh,H Abdelmoty,A Raslan,U Fouda,M Mohesen,M Youssef (1987). Reproductive Health and HIV Awareness among Newly Married Egyptian Couples Without Formal Education.
A Crosta,J Moore,A Canasas (1989). Enhancement Of Landsat Thematic Mapper Imagery For Mineral Prospecting In Weathered And Vegetated Terrain In S.E. Brazil.
A Darnley (1989). Regional airborne gammarays survey: a review.
Eugene Druker (2016). Processing of Airborne Gamma-Ray Spectra: Extracting Photopeaks.
B Dickson (2004). Recent advances in aerial gamma-ray surveying.
Joseph Duval (1983). Composite color images of aerial gamma-ray spectrometric data.
E El Shazly,Miroslav Krs (1973). Paleogeography and paleomagnetism of the Nubian Sandstone Eastern Desert of Egypt.
A Johnson (1990). JAZELLE users manual.
M Fouad,M Mielik,A Gharieb (2004). An Attempt to automate the lithological classification of rocks using geological, gamma-spectrometric and satellite image datasets. Arab Conference on the Peaceful Uses of Atomic Energy.
M Gouda,A Gharieb (2006). Using Airborne Gamma-Ray Spectrometry for Mapping Radioactive Zones in G. Kadabora Area, Central Eastern Desert, Egypt.
(2010). Geosoft adds SRTM data to Geosoft DAP public server.
Ling Han,Bo Zhao,Jian‐jian Wu,Ting‐ting Wu,Min Feng (2018). A new method for extraction of alteration information using the Landsat 8 imagery in a heavily vegetated and sediments‐covered region: A case study from Zhejiang Province, E. China.
A Hashad,M Hassan,A Aboul Gadayel (1982). Geologicol and petrological study of wad. Natash late Cretaceous volcanic, Egypt.
(1988). Uranium Exploration Planning, Management and Practice.
Prasantha Jayawardhana,S Sheard (1997). The use of airborne gamma-ray spectrometry—A case study from the Mount Isa inlier, northwest Queensland, Australia.
Nirmala Jain,Ramdayal Singh,Priyom Roy,Tapas Martha,K Vinod Kumar,Prakash Chauhan (2018). Mapping of hydrothermally altered zones in Aravalli Supergroup of rocks around Dungarpur and Udaipur, India, using Landsat-8 OLI and spectroscopy.
M Mwaniki,M Moeller,G Schellmann (2015). A comparison of Landsat 8 (OLI) and Landsat 7 (ETM+) in mapping geology and visualising lineaments: A case study of central region Kenya.
Feizollah Masoumi,Taymour Eslamkish,Mehdi Honarmand,Ali Abkar (2017). A Comparative Study of Landsat‐7 and Landsat‐8 Data Using Image Processing Methods for Hydrothermal Alteration Mapping.
A Pour,A Ali (2014). Lithological mapping and hydrothermal alteration using Landsat 8 data: a case study in ariab mining district, red sea hills, Sudan.
A Pour,M Hashim (2015). Hydrothermal alteration mapping from Landsat-8 data, Sar H ) Use of Remote Sensing and Gamma Ray Spectrometric Data for Elucidating Radioactive Mineralized Zones, Wadi Jararah-Wadi Kharit Area.

Download References

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Abdelmohsen G. Nady. 2019. \u201cUse of Remote Sensing and Gamma Ray Spectrometric Data for Elucidating Radioactive Mineralized Zones, Wadi Jararah-Wadi Kharit Area, South Eastern Desert, Egypt\u201d. Global Journal of Science Frontier Research - H: Environment & Environmental geology N/A (GJSFR Volume 19 Issue H1): .

More Citation Formats

Select Citation Style:

Download Citation

Download Article

GJSFR Volume 19 Issue H1
Pg. 55- 73

Explore Journals Explore Volume Read This Issue

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJSFR

Print ISSN 0975-5896

e-ISSN 2249-4626

Keywords

Not Found

Classification

GJSFR-H Classification: FOR Code: 040699

Submission ReceivedDecember 7, 2018
Peer Review Double Blind
Handling Editor
Accepted January 3, 2019
Published January 16, 2019

Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

February 7, 2019

Language

Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

View in VR

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

View in 3D

Article Matrices

Total Score: 105

Country: Egypt

Subject: Global Journal of Science Frontier Research - H: Environment & Environmental geology

Authors: Abdelmohsen G. Nady, Reda E. El Arafy, Mohammad G. Al-Ibiary, Maysa M. Nabeh, Samah S. Abdeen (PhD/Dr. count: 0)

View Count (all-time): 148

Total Views (Real + Logic): 2823

Total Downloads (simulated): 1425

Publish Date: 2019 02, Thu

Monthly Totals (Real + Logic):

Month 1: 28 views
Month 2: 40 views
Month 3: 26 views
Month 4: 36 views
Month 5: 56 views
Month 6: 51 views
Month 7: 46 views
Month 8: 37 views
Month 9: 38 views
Month 10: 35 views
Month 11: 30 views
Month 12: 39 views
Month 13: 24 views
Month 14: 22 views
Month 15: 23 views
Month 16: 34 views
Month 17: 36 views
Month 18: 32 views
Month 19: 34 views
Month 20: 34 views
Month 21: 26 views
Month 22: 32 views
Month 23: 26 views
Month 24: 33 views
Month 25: 31 views
Month 26: 47 views
Month 27: 21 views
Month 28: 37 views
Month 29: 15 views
Month 30: 13 views
Month 31: 29 views
Month 32: 25 views
Month 33: 31 views
Month 34: 25 views
Month 35: 35 views
Month 36: 21 views
Month 37: 39 views
Month 38: 26 views
Month 39: 37 views
Month 40: 38 views
Month 41: 20 views
Month 42: 37 views
Month 43: 30 views
Month 44: 46 views
Month 45: 27 views
Month 46: 28 views
Month 47: 34 views
Month 48: 33 views
Month 49: 15 views
Month 50: 35 views
Month 51: 26 views
Month 52: 32 views
Month 53: 30 views
Month 54: 37 views
Month 55: 24 views
Month 56: 20 views
Month 57: 36 views
Month 58: 37 views
Month 59: 20 views
Month 60: 32 views
Month 61: 29 views
Month 62: 47 views
Month 63: 42 views
Month 64: 21 views
Month 65: 48 views
Month 66: 38 views
Month 67: 23 views
Month 68: 29 views
Month 69: 24 views
Month 70: 20 views
Month 71: 21 views
Month 72: 26 views
Month 73: 19 views
Month 74: 19 views
Month 75: 36 views
Month 76: 23 views
Month 77: 41 views
Month 78: 55 views
Month 79: 27 views
Month 80: 30 views
Month 81: 27 views
Month 82: 29 views
Month 83: 25 views
Month 84: 42 views
Month 85: 40 views
Month 86: 38 views

Total Views: 2823

Total Downloads: 1425

2026 Trends

Published Article

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]