Use of the Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar on Performance Evaluation of Polymer Composites for Ballistic Protection Purposes

Use of the Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar on Performance Evaluation of Polymer Composites for Ballistic Protection Purposes

Rafael Rodrigues Dias Associate Researcher

Contact

Iaci Miranda Pereira

Contact

Bluma Guenther Soares

Contact

Use of the Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar on Performance Evaluation of Polymer Composites for Ballistic Protection Purposes

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

1T223

Use of the Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar on Performance Evaluation of Polymer Composites for Ballistic Protection Purposes Banner

AI TAKEAWAY

Connecting with the Eternal Ground

Abstract

This article presents a review of the split Hopkinson pressure bar uses on evaluation of polymer composites ballistic material’s dynamic mechanical properties A small introduction concerning the equipment is given, followed by a summarization of the most recent published studies relating to dynamic compressive tests used to study dynamic properties of ballistic polymeric composites such as Young’s modulus, maximum stress, strain at maximum stress, tenacity and maximum strain, as well as the sensitivity of these properties to changes in the applied strain rate.

References

57 Cites in Article

Reference Format

Ashok Bhatnagar (2006). Lightweight ballistic composites.
Krishan Chawla (2012). Composite Materials.
Alessandro Pegoretti,Matteo Traina (2018). Liquid crystalline organic fibers and their mechanical behavior.
I Crouch (2017). Introduction to armour materials.
Paul Hazell,Armour (2016). Ceramic Armour.
A Hamouda,R Sohaimi,A Zaidi,S Abdullah (2012). Advance in military textiles and personnel equipments.
S Rebouillat (2016). Advanced Fibrous Composite Materials for Ballistic Protection.
T Jackson,S Samanta (2015). Characterization of Kevlar Fiber and Its Composites : A Review.
I Crouch,J Sandlin,S Thomas (2017). Polymers and fibre-reinforced plastics.
U Vaidya (2011). Impact Engineering of Composite Structures.
Iii Gray,G (2000). -Mechanical Testing and Evaluation.
M Meyers (1994). Dynamic Behavior of Material.
Weinong Chen,Bo Song (2011). Split Hopkinson (Kolsky) Bar.
Bertram Hopkinson (1914). X. A method of measuring the pressure produced in the detonation of high, explosives or by the impact of bullets.
H Kolsky (1949). An Investigation of the Mechanical Properties of Materials at very High Rates of Loading.
M Pagnoncelli (2017). Mechanical and ballistic analysis of aramid/vinyl ester composites.
J Field,S Walley,W Proud,H Goldrein,C Siviour (2004). Review of experimental techniques for high rate deformation and shock studies.
E Davies,S Hunter (1963). The dynamic compression testing of solids by the method of the split Hopkinson pressure bar.
P Follansbee,C Frantz (1983). Wave Propagation in the Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar.
Bazle Gama,Sergey Lopatnikov,John Gillespie (2004). Hopkinson bar experimental technique: A critical review.
X Wu,D Gorham (1997). Stress Equilibrium in the Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar Test.
D Gorham (1983). A numerical method for the correction of dispersion in pressure bar signals.
Libo Ren,Mike Larson,Bazle Gama,John Gillespie,Jr (2004). Wave Dispersion in Cylindrical Tubes: Applications to Hopkinson Pressure Bar Experimental Techniques.
M Hosur,J Alexander,U Vaidya,S Jeelani (2001). High strain rate compression response of carbon/epoxy laminate composites.
N Naik,Venkateswara Kavala (2009). High strain rate behavior of woven fabric composites under compressive loading.
R Dias,S Sousa,P Patrício,I Pereira (2017). Influence of thickness/diameter ratio on strain hardening behavior of high molecular weight polyethylene after dynamical compressive tests using Hopkinson pressure bar.
E Brown,R Willms,G Gray,P Rae,C Cady,K Vecchio,J Flowers,M Martinez (2007). Influence of Molecular Conformation on the Constitutive Response of Polyethylene: A Comparison of HDPE, UHMWPE, and PEX.
N Naik,Kedar Pandya,Jayaram Pothnis,Tamrat Gelu (2014). Revisiting Kolsky bar data evaluation method.
Y Pan,W Chen,B Song (2005). Upper Limit of Constant Strain Rates in a Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar Experiment with Elastic Specimens.
N Naik,Veerraju Ch,Venkateswara Kavala (2009). Hybrid composites under high strain rate compressive loading.
The High Strain Rate Compression Test (1991). Unknown Title.
W Zhong,A Rusinek,T Jankowiak,F Abed,R Bernier,G Sutter (2015). Influence of interfacial friction and specimen configuration in Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar system.
Takeshi Iwamoto,Takashi Yokoyama (2012). Effects of radial inertia and end friction in specimen geometry in split Hopkinson pressure bar tests: A computational study.
S Arjun,O Sen (2011). Effect of Specimen Size in the Kolsky Bar.
U Lindholm (1964). Some experiments with the split hopkinson pressure bar∗.
S Samanta,Of Aluminium And Copper At Elevated Dynamic Strain,Temperatures (1971). Dynamic deformation of aluminium and copper at elevated temperatures.
R Govender,L Louca,A Pullen,A Fallah,G Nurick (2012). Determining the throughthickness properties of thick glass fiber reinforced polymers at high strain rates.
A Tasdemirci,A Kara,A Turan,G Tunusoglu,M Guden,I Hall (2011). Experimental and Numerical Investigation of High Strain Rate Mechanical Behavior of a [0/45/90/ - 45] Quadriaxial E-Glass/Polyester Composite.
S Zainuddin,M Hosur,R Barua,Ashok Kumar,S Jeelani (2011). Effects of ultraviolet radiation and condensation on static and dynamic compression behavior of neat and nanoclay infused epoxy/glass composites.
Kiyun Kim,P Mantena,Seyed Daryadel,Veera Boddu,Matthew Brenner,Jignesh Patel (2015). Dynamic Mechanical Analysis and High Strain‐Rate Energy Absorption Characteristics of Vertically Aligned Carbon Nanotube Reinforced Woven Fiber‐Glass Composites.
J Arbaoui,M Tarfaoui,C Bouery,A El,M Alaoui (2016). Comparative study of mechanical properties and damage kinetics of two-and three-dimensional woven composites under high-strain rate dynamic compressive loading.
M Tarfaoui,A El Moumen,H Ben Yahia (2018). Damage detection versus heat dissipation in E-glass/Epoxy laminated composites under dynamic compression at high strain rate.
Sung-Choong Woo,Tae-Won Kim (2014). High-strain-rate impact in Kevlar-woven composites and fracture analysis using acoustic emission.
Sung-Choong Woo,Tae-Won Kim (2016). High strain-rate failure in carbon/Kevlar hybrid woven composites via a novel SHPB-AE coupled test.
R Kapoor,L Pangeni,A Kumar,S Ahmad (2016). High strain rate compression response of woven Kevlar reinforced polypropylene composites.
Hemant Chouhan,Neelanchali Asija,Shishay Gebremeskel,Naresh Bhatnagar (2017). Effect of Specimen Thickness on High Strain Rate Properties of Kevlar/Polypropylene Composite.
A Bandaru (2017). Characterization of 3D angleinterlock thermoplastic composites under high strain rate compression loadings.
Xiuyang Qian,Hongxin Wang,Dashi Zhang,Guilin Wen (2016). High strain rate out-of-plane compression properties of aramid fabric reinforced polyamide composite.
Saisai Cao,Qian Chen,Yunpeng Wang,Shouhu Xuan,Wanquan Jiang,Xinglong Gong (2017). High strain-rate dynamic mechanical properties of Kevlar fabrics impregnated with shear thickening fluid.
Qianyun He,Saisai Cao,Yunpeng Wang,Shouhu Xuan,Pengfei Wang,Xinglong Gong (2017). Impact resistance of shear thickening fluid/Kevlar composite treated with shear-stiffening gel.
F Rabbi,V Chalivendra,Y Kim (2018). Dynamic constitutive response of novel auxetic Kevlar/epoxy composites.
Khubab Shaker,Abdul Jabbar,Mehmet Karahan,Nevin Karahan,Yasir Nawab (2017). Study of dynamic compressive behaviour of aramid and ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene composites using Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar.
Bin Shi,Ying Sun,Li Chen,Jia Li (2010). Energy Absorption of Ultra-High Molecular Weight Polyethylene Fiber-Reinforced Laminates at High Strain Rates.
Jason Parker,K Ramesh (2016). Effect of Consolidation Pressure on the Transverse Compressive Strength of UHMWPE Composites at High Strain-rates.
Chendi Zhu,Gang Li,Xudong Yu,Gang Zhao,Jian Yang (2017). Vibration power flow based damage detection of fiber-reinforced laminated composite plates.
N Asija,H Chouhan,S Gebremeskel,R Singh,N Bhatnagar (2017). High strain rate behavior of STF-treated UHMWPE composites.
N Asija,H Chouhan,S Gebremeskel,N Bhatnagar (2018). Impact response of Shear Thickening Fluid ( STF ) treated ultra high molecular weight poly ethylene composites -study of the e ff ect of STF treatment method.

Download References

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Rafael Rodrigues Dias. 2019. \u201cUse of the Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar on Performance Evaluation of Polymer Composites for Ballistic Protection Purposes\u201d. Global Journal of Research in Engineering - J: General Engineering GJRE-J Volume 19 (GJRE Volume 19 Issue J5): .

More Citation Formats

Select Citation Style:

Download Citation

Download Article

GJRE Volume 19 Issue J5
Pg. 31- 39

Explore Journals Explore Volume Read This Issue

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/gjre

Print ISSN 0975-5861

e-ISSN 2249-4596

Keywords

Not Found

Classification

GJRE-J Classification: FOR Code: 091599

Submission ReceivedDecember 6, 2018
Peer Review Double Blind
Handling Editor
Accepted January 1, 2019
Published January 15, 2019

Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

November 4, 2019

Language

Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

View in VR

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

View in 3D

Article Matrices

Total Views: 2391

Total Downloads: 1290

2026 Trends

Published Article

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]