Wave One and One Shape Files: Survival in Severely Curved Artificial Canals

Emilia Karova
Emilia Karova
Snezhanka Topalova-Pirinska
Snezhanka Topalova-Pirinska
Medical University of Sofia Medical University of Sofia

Send Message

To: Author

Wave One and One Shape Files: Survival in Severely Curved Artificial Canals

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

0N00F

Wave One and One Shape Files: Survival in Severely Curved Artificial Canals Banner

AI TAKEAWAY

Connecting with the Eternal Ground
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scots Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sundanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu
Font Type
Font Size
Font Size
Bedground

Abstract

Nickel-titanium rotary instruments are preferred for their excellent flexibility, superelasticity and improved cutting efficiency but they can separate unexpectedly, especially in curved canals. Instrumentation with WaveOne and One Shape files was performed on 200 artificial canals divided in four equal groups. Glide path was created with PathFiles and G-files. Average lifespan and survival rate of the shaping files were tested, before and after a glide path creation. Average lifespan of WaveOne and One Shape files without a creation of a glide path was 10.25±2.50 canals and 4.1 (±1.37) canals, respectively and after the creation of a glide path -17.50±2.12 canals and 4.6 (±1.30) canals. Average lifespan and cumulative survival of the tested files revealed significant difference. WaveOne files showed significantly higher resistance to fracture compared with One Shape files. Lifespan and survival rate of tested files increased after the creation of a glide path. Reciprocal motion increases significantly instruments life.

References

47 Cites in Article
  1. Satish Alapati,William Brantley,Masahiro Iijima,William Clark,Libor Kovarik,Caesar Buie,Jie Liu,William Ben Johnson (2009). Metallurgical Characterization of a New Nickel-Titanium Wire for Rotary Endodontic Instruments.
  2. F Arens,M Hoen,H Steiman,G Dietz (2003). Evaluation of single-use rotary nickel-titanium instruments.
  3. E Berutti,A Negro,M Lendini,D Pasqualini (2004). Influence of Manual Preflaring and Torque on the Failure Rate of ProTaper Rotary Instruments.
  4. Elio Berutti,Davide Salvatore Paolino,Giorgio Chiandussi,Mario Alovisi,Giuseppe Cantatore,Arnaldo Castellucci,Damiano Pasqualini (2012). Root Canal Anatomy Preservation of WaveOne Reciprocating Files with or without Glide Path.
  5. E Berutti,G Cantatore (2006). Rotary instruments in Nickel Titanium.
  6. E Berutti,G Chiandussi,I Gaviglio,A Ibba (2003). Comparative analysis of torsional and bending stresses in two mathematical models of nickel titanium rotary instruments: ProTaper versus ProFile.
  7. A Bonaccorso,G Cantatore,G Condorelli,E Schafer,T Tripi (2009). Shaping ability of four nickel-titanium rotary instruments in simulated S-shaped canals.
  8. J Chen,H Messer (2002). A Comparison of Stainless Steel Hand and Rotary Nickel‐Titanium Instrumentation Using a Silicone Impression Technique.
  9. G Cheung,C Liu (2009). A restrospective study of endodontic treatment outcome between nickeltitanium rotary and stainless steel hand filing techniques.
  10. G Cheung,B Peng,Z Bian,Y Shen,B Darvell (2005). Defects in ProTaper S1 instruments after clinical use: fractographic examination.
  11. G De‐deus,E Moreira,H Lopes,C Elias (2010). Extended cyclic fatigue life of F2 ProTaper instruments used in reciprocating movement.
  12. Di Fiore,P (2007). A dozen ways to prevent nickeltitanium rotary instrument fracture.
  13. V Franco,C Fabiani,S Taschieri,A Malentacca,M Bortolin,Del Fabbro,M (2011). Investigation of the shaping ability of nickel-titanium files when used with a reciprocating motion.
  14. Gianluca Gambarini,Nicola Grande,Gianluca Plotino,Francesco Somma,Manish Garala,Massimo De Luca,Luca Testarelli (2008). Fatigue Resistance of Engine-driven Rotary Nickel-Titanium Instruments Produced by New Manufacturing Methods.
  15. M Hulsmann,O Peters,P Dummer (2005). Mechanical preparation of root canals: shaping goals, techniques and means.
  16. M Hülsmann,I Schinkel (1999). Influence of several factors on the success or failure of removal of fractured instruments from the root canal.
  17. Mian Iqbal,Meetu Kohli,Jessica Kim (2006). A Retrospective Clinical Study of Incidence of Root Canal Instrument Separation in an Endodontics Graduate Program: A PennEndo Database Study.
  18. H Kim,S Kwak,G Cheung,D Ko,S Chung,Lee (2012). Cyclic fatigue and torsional resistance of two new nickel-titanium instruments used in reciprocation motion: Recoproc versus WaveOne.
  19. H Kim,J Yum,B Hur,G Cheung (2010). Cyclic fatigue and fracture characteristics of ground and twisted nickel-titanium rotary files.
  20. Hélio Lopes,Thaiane Gambarra-Soares,Carlos Elias,José Siqueira,Inês Inojosa,Weber Lopes,Victor Vieira (2013). Comparison of the Mechanical Properties of Rotary Instruments Made of Conventional Nickel-Titanium Wire, M-Wire, or Nickel-Titanium Alloy in R-Phase.
  21. B Martin,G Zelada,P Varela (2003). Factors influencing the fracture of nickel-titanium rotary instruments.
  22. P Parahos,I Gordon,H Messer (2004). Factors influencing defects of rotary nickel-titanium endodontic instruments after clinical use.
  23. Peter Parashos,Harold Messer (2006). Rotary NiTi Instrument Fracture and its Consequences.
  24. O Peters,C Peters (2010). Cleaning and shaping of the root canal system.
  25. O Peters (2004). Current Challenges and Concepts in the Preparation of Root Canal Systems: A Review.
  26. John Pruett,David Clement,David Carnes (1997). Cyclic fatigue testing of nickel-titanium endodontic instruments.
  27. D Roland,W Andelin,D Browning,G Roberthsu,M Torabinejad (2002). The Effect of Preflaring on the Rates of Separation for 0.04 Taper Nickel Titanium Rotary Instruments.
  28. C Ruddle (2005). The ProTaper technique.
  29. B Sattapan,G Nervo,J Palamara,H Messer (2000). Defects in rotary nickel-titanium files after clinical use.
  30. E Schäfer,U Schulz-Bongert,G Tulus (2004). Comparison of Hand Stainless Steel and Nickel Titanium Rotary Instrumentation: A Clinical Study.
  31. Herbert Schilder (1974). Cleaning and Shaping the Root Canal.
  32. Frank Setzer,Christian Böhme (2013). Influence of Combined Cyclic Fatigue and Torsional Stress on the Fracture Point of Nickel-Titanium Rotary Instruments.
  33. Y Shen,M Haapasalo,G Cheug,B Peng (2009). Defects in nickel-titanium instruments after clinical use. Part I: relationship between observed imperfections and factors leading to such defects in a cohort study.
  34. Jeffrey Short,Leslie Morgan,J Baumgartner (1997). A comparison of canal centering ability of four instrumentation techniques.
  35. D Sonntag,A Guntermann,S Kim,V Stachniss (2003). Root canal shaping with manual stainless steel files and rotary NiTi files performed by students.
  36. Y Tygesen,R Steiman,C Ciavarro (2001). Comparison of distortion and separation utilizing ProFile and Pow-R nickel-titanium rotary files.
  37. P Varela Patino,B Biedma,C Rodriguez,G Cantatore,J Bahillo (2005). The Influence of a Manual Glide Path on the Separation Rate of NiTi Rotary Instruments.
  38. Purificación Varela-Patiño,Adalce Ibañez-Párraga,Berta Rivas-Mundiña,Giuseppe Cantatore,Xosé Otero,Benjamin Martin-Biedma (2010). Alternating versus Continuous Rotation: A Comparative Study of the Effect on Instrument Life.
  39. P Varela-Patino,B Martin,N Rodrigues (2008). Fracture rate of nickel-titanium instruments using continuous versus alternating rotation.
  40. J Webber,P Machtou,W Pertot,S Kuttler,C Ruddle,J West (2011). The WaveOne single-file reciprocating system.
  41. Jintao Wu,Gang Lei,Ming Yan,Yan Yu,Jinhua Yu,Guangdong Zhang (2011). Instrument Separation Analysis of Multi-used ProTaper Universal Rotary System during Root Canal Therapy.
  42. J Yao,S Schwartz,T Beeson (2006). Cyclic fatigue of three types of rotary nickel-titanium files in a dynamic model.
  43. G Yared,Bou Dagher,F Machtou,P (2001). Influence of rotational speed, torque, and operator's proficiency on ProFile failures.
  44. S You,K Bae,S Baek,K Kum,W Shon,Lee (2010). Lifespan of one nickel-titanium rotary file with reciprocating motion in curved root canals.
  45. M Zarrabi,M Javidi,M Vatanpour,H Esmaeili (2010). The influence of torque and manual glide path on the defect or separation rate of NiTi rotary instruments in root canal therapy.
  46. G Zelada,P Varela,B Martin,J Bahillo,F Magan,S Ahn (2002). The Effect of Rotational Speed and the Curvature of Root Canals on the Breakage of Rotary Endodontic Instruments.
  47. En-Wei Zhang,Gary Cheung,Yu-Feng Zheng (2010). Influence of Cross-sectional Design and Dimension on Mechanical Behavior of Nickel-Titanium Instruments under Torsion and Bending: A Numerical Analysis.

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Emilia Karova. 2014. \u201cWave One and One Shape Files: Survival in Severely Curved Artificial Canals\u201d. Global Journal of Medical Research - J: Dentistry & Otolaryngology GJMR-J Volume 14 (GJMR Volume 14 Issue J4).

Download Citation

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/gjmra

Print ISSN 0975-5888

e-ISSN 2249-4618

Version of record

v1.2

Issue date
August 16, 2014

Language
en
Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

Article Matrices
Total Views: 4346
Total Downloads: 2187
2026 Trends
Related Research
Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

Quote and Order Details

Contact Person

Invoice Address

Notes or Comments

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

Wave One and One Shape Files: Survival in Severely Curved Artificial Canals

Emilia Karova
Emilia Karova <p>Medical University of Sofia</p>
Snezhanka Topalova-Pirinska
Snezhanka Topalova-Pirinska

Research Journals