Neural Networks and Rules-based Systems used to Find Rational and Scientific Correlations between being Here and Now with Afterlife Conditions
Neural Networks and Rules-based Systems used to Find Rational and
To: Author
Article Fingerprint
ReserarchID
U28HU
Matheus Colares do Nascimento
This paper’s aim is to critically analyze Wittgenstein’s arguments against traditional philosophy. It is possible to identify three arguments against it in Wittgenstein’s work: (1) The tractarian critique of the metaphysical necessary propositions, (2) the critique of the conception of real definition in the PI and (3) the problem of the role of the ideal, or the problem of dogmatism. By analyzing these three arguments we intend to show that none of them implies necessarily that we should abandon any positive conception of philosophy and stick to a negative analytical one as Wittgenstein understands it.
Matheus Colares do Nascimento. 2021. \u201cWittgenstein and the End of Philosophy?\u201d. Global Journal of Human-Social Science - A: Arts & Humanities GJHSS-A Volume 21 (GJHSS Volume 21 Issue A13): .
Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJHSS
Print ISSN 0975-587X
e-ISSN 2249-460X
The methods for personal identification and authentication are no exception.
Total Score: 101
Country: Brazil
Subject: Global Journal of Human-Social Science - A: Arts & Humanities
Authors: Matheus Colares do Nascimento (PhD/Dr. count: 0)
View Count (all-time): 179
Total Views (Real + Logic): 2063
Total Downloads (simulated): 841
Publish Date: 2021 12, Tue
Monthly Totals (Real + Logic):
Neural Networks and Rules-based Systems used to Find Rational and
A Comparative Study of the Effeect of Promotion on Employee
The Problem Managing Bicycling Mobility in Latin American Cities: Ciclovias
Impact of Capillarity-Induced Rising Damp on the Energy Performance of
This paper’s aim is to critically analyze Wittgenstein’s arguments against traditional philosophy. It is possible to identify three arguments against it in Wittgenstein’s work: (1) The tractarian critique of the metaphysical necessary propositions, (2) the critique of the conception of real definition in the PI and (3) the problem of the role of the ideal, or the problem of dogmatism. By analyzing these three arguments we intend to show that none of them implies necessarily that we should abandon any positive conception of philosophy and stick to a negative analytical one as Wittgenstein understands it.
We are currently updating this article page for a better experience.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.