Would it be Possible to Optimize a Municipal Wastewater Treatment Plant?

Stig Morling

Would it be Possible to Optimize a Municipal Wastewater Treatment Plant?

Stig Morling *

Contact

Would it be Possible to Optimize a Municipal Wastewater Treatment Plant?

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

377KY

Would it be Possible to Optimize a Municipal Wastewater Treatment Plant? Banner

Key Research Insights

Synthesized scholarly intelligence & interactive research assistant

This converted HTML version may contain rendering inconsistencies. Please refer to the PDF for the authoritative version, or click here to provide feedback.

Abstract

Operation of modern wastewater treatment facilities (in the following: WWTP) are to a very large extent based on different forms of biological treatment. Historically a number of activated sludge models have dominated the market. The model that originally was developed during the second decade of the 20th century is often addressed as a suspended growth system as a contrast to attached growth models, such as trickling filters, rotating biological contactors (RBC:s) and more recently the moving bed biological reactors (MBBR:s). Regardless of the system chosen the biological stage in a modern WWTP represents the major energy consuming stage. The obvious exception for this statement is by convention the anaerobic treatment, especially used when the wastewater is a “high strength” stream, rich in hydrocarbonates. The sharpened demand on biological nutrient removal, especially nitrogen removal has even more highlighted the needs for an efficient process control.

References

10 Cites in Article

Reference Format

1. David Jenkins,Michael Richard,Glen Daigger (2003). Manual on the Causes and Control of Activated Sludge Bulking, Foaming, and Other Solids Separation Problems. 3rd (Third) edition Spiral-bound – June
2. Stig Morling (2014). Problems in Water Environmental Control—Sense and Nonsense in Measurement of Water Protection. Journal of Water Resource and Protection, 06(15), 1381-1389.
CrossRef DOI
3. Standard ATV-DVWK -A 131E: Dimensioning of Single-Stage Activated Sludge Slants.
4. BioWin 4.1. BioWin
5. Stefan Marklund,Stig Morling (1994). Biological phosphorus removal at temperatures from 3 to 10 oC - a full scale study of a sequencing batch reactor unit. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 21(1), 81-88.
CrossRef DOI
6. Johanna Berg,Stig Morling (2013). Process Adaption and Modifications of a Nutrient Removing Wastewater Treatment Plant in Sri Lanka Operated at Low Loading Conditions. Materials Sciences and Applications, 04(05), 299-306.
CrossRef DOI
7. S. Morling (2007). Plant performance of an Sequencing Batch Reactor in Poland, operated with high Chromium load, reaching advanced nutrient removal. Proceeding at the Vienna conference on Large Wastewater Treatment Plants, September
8. S. Morling (2008). Nitrogen removal efficiency and nitrification rates at the Sequencing Batch Reactor in Nowy Targ, Poland. VATTEN, 2, 121-128.
9. S. Morling (2001). Performance of an SBR-plant for advanced nutrient removal, using septic sludge as a carbon source. Water Science and Technology, 43(3), 131-138.
CrossRef DOI
10. Conan Doyle,A. (1893). The Cardboard Box. The Memoirs of Sherlock Holmes, 7486-9074.
CrossRef DOI

Download References

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Stig Morling. 2015. "Would it be Possible to Optimize a Municipal Wastewater Treatment Plant?". Global Journal of Science Frontier Research - H: Environment & Environmental geology GJSFR-H Volume 14 (GJSFR Volume 14 Issue 48 (H6)).

More Citation Formats

Select Citation Style:

Download Citation

GJSFR Volume 14 Issue 48 (H6)

Explore Journals Explore Volume Read This Issue

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJSFR

Print ISSN 0975-5896

e-ISSN 2249-4626

Keywords

bod (biochemical oxygen demand)loading conditions measurement nitrification nitrogen phosphorus solids retention time temperature

Classification

GJSFR-H Classification FOR Code: 090409

Submission ReceivedOctober 22, 2014
Peer Review Double Blind
Handling Editor
Accepted November 20, 2014
Published December 8, 2014

Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

December 8, 2014

Language

English

Order Article Reprint

Experience in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

View in VR

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

View in 3D

Article Matrices

Total Score: 102

Country: Sweden

Subject: Global Journal of Science Frontier Research - H: Environment & Environmental geology

Authors: Stig Morling, Niclas Astrand (PhD/Dr. count: 0)

View Count (all-time): 438

Total Views (Real + Logic): 1475

Total Downloads (simulated): 131

Publish Date: 2014 12, Mon

Monthly Totals (Real + Logic):

Month 1: 23 views
Month 2: 30 views
Month 3: 28 views
Month 4: 34 views
Month 5: 34 views
Month 6: 49 views
Month 7: 32 views
Month 8: 37 views
Month 9: 27 views
Month 10: 48 views
Month 11: 35 views
Month 12: 31 views
Month 13: 23 views
Month 14: 16 views
Month 15: 21 views
Month 16: 13 views
Month 17: 24 views
Month 18: 36 views
Month 19: 24 views
Month 20: 29 views
Month 21: 32 views
Month 22: 50 views
Month 23: 25 views
Month 24: 39 views
Month 25: 33 views
Month 26: 13 views
Month 27: 24 views
Month 28: 17 views
Month 29: 37 views
Month 30: 13 views
Month 31: 32 views
Month 32: 39 views
Month 33: 32 views
Month 34: 30 views
Month 35: 16 views
Month 36: 30 views
Month 37: 19 views
Month 38: 18 views
Month 39: 18 views
Month 40: 13 views
Month 41: 41 views
Month 42: 42 views
Month 43: 29 views
Month 44: 20 views
Month 45: 17 views
Month 46: 40 views
Month 47: 20 views
Month 48: 36 views
Month 49: 25 views
Month 50: 40 views
Month 51: 34 views
Month 52: 43 views
Month 53: 34 views
Month 54: 47 views
Month 55: 21 views
Month 56: 20 views
Month 57: 38 views
Month 58: 49 views
Month 59: 43 views
Month 60: 48 views
Month 61: 19 views
Month 62: 38 views
Month 63: 35 views
Month 64: 20 views
Month 65: 33 views
Month 66: 44 views
Month 67: 40 views
Month 68: 12 views
Month 69: 35 views
Month 70: 46 views
Month 71: 23 views
Month 72: 34 views
Month 73: 21 views
Month 74: 33 views
Month 75: 43 views
Month 76: 39 views
Month 77: 23 views
Month 78: 16 views
Month 79: 22 views
Month 80: 33 views
Month 81: 31 views
Month 82: 11 views
Month 83: 35 views
Month 84: 15 views
Month 85: 40 views
Month 86: 19 views
Month 87: 36 views
Month 88: 30 views
Month 89: 30 views
Month 90: 32 views
Month 91: 22 views
Month 92: 39 views
Month 93: 21 views
Month 94: 36 views
Month 95: 28 views
Month 96: 33 views
Month 97: 36 views
Month 98: 25 views
Month 99: 30 views
Month 100: 43 views
Month 101: 26 views
Month 102: 22 views
Month 103: 40 views
Month 104: 43 views
Month 105: 17 views
Month 106: 28 views
Month 107: 26 views
Month 108: 41 views
Month 109: 18 views
Month 110: 30 views
Month 111: 20 views
Month 112: 32 views
Month 113: 47 views
Month 114: 24 views
Month 115: 19 views
Month 116: 50 views
Month 117: 33 views
Month 118: 29 views
Month 119: 26 views
Month 120: 27 views
Month 121: 43 views
Month 122: 22 views
Month 123: 27 views
Month 124: 10 views
Month 125: 21 views
Month 126: 16 views
Month 127: 21 views
Month 128: 32 views
Month 129: 33 views
Month 130: 32 views
Month 131: 41 views
Month 132: 29 views
Month 133: 18 views
Month 134: 60 views
Month 135: 61 views
Month 136: 50 views
Month 137: 47 views
Month 138: 42 views
Month 139: 25 views
Month 140: 43 views
Month 141: 43 views
Month 142: 62 views
Month 143: 49 views

Total Views: 1.5K

Total Downloads: 131

All Trends