Approximation of the Localized Szász-Mirakjan-Durrmeyer Operators

§ Huainan Normal University

Send Message

To: Author

Approximation of the Localized Szász-Mirakjan-Durrmeyer  Operators

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

6A0N5

Approximation of the Localized Szász-Mirakjan-Durrmeyer  Operators Banner

AI TAKEAWAY

Connecting with the Eternal Ground
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scots Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sundanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu
Font Type
Font Size
Font Size
Bedground

Abstract

In the present paper, we localize the Szász-Mirakjan-Durrmeyer operators. For which we discuss the convergence and the approximation and obtain theorems of convergence, approximation and rate of approximation.

I. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND

The famous Szasz-Mirakjan perator is a positive linear operator on C [ 0 , ) (continuous function on [ 0 , ) ), defined as follows

S n ( f ; x ) = e n x k = 0 ( n x ) k k ! f ( k n ) x [ 0 , ) .

It is easy to obtain by calculation

( 1 ) S n ( 1 ; x ) = 1 ; S n ( t ; x ) = x ; S n ( t 2 ; x ) = x 2 + x n
S n ( ( t x ) 2 ; x ) = x n

There are a lot of in-depth researches on its approximation, and the research results are very rich.[1-21]

The literature[17] introduce The Szasz-Mirakjan-Durrmeyer operator by Durrmeyer transformation of Szasz-Mirakjan operator

S ~ n ( f ; x ) = k = 0 n 0 + f ( t ) S n , k ( t ) d t S n , k ( x ) x [ 0 , )

Of which

S n , k ( x ) = ( n x ) k k ! e n x , k = 0 , 1 , ,

It is easily obtained by (1) and (2)

( 3 ) S ~ n ( 1 ; x ) = 1 ; S ~ n ( t ; x ) = x + 1 n ; S ~ n ( t 2 ; x ) = x 2 + 4 x n + 2 n 2
( 4 ) S ~ n ( ( t x ) ; x ) = 1 n ; S ~ n ( ( t x ) 2 ; x ) = 2 x n + 2 n 2

Obviously this is a positive linear operator on L [ 0 , ) (integrable function on [ 0 , ) ), and there has been a lot of research on it.[21-26].

Operator localization is one of the methods to transform operators. In order to be convenient and feasible, the localization of some operators is necessary. The idea of operator localization originates from the truncation of infinite sum. In 1980, literature [27] firstly introduced Szasz-Mirakjan localization operator as follows

S n , N ( f ; x ) = e n x k = 0 N ( n x ) k k ! f ( k n ) x [ 0 , )

In this paper, the same method is used to introduce the localized Szasz-Mirakjan-Durrmeyer operator as follows

S ~ n , N ( f ; x ) = k = 0 N n 0 + f ( t ) S n , k ( t ) d t S n , k ( x ) x [ 0 , ) ,

Of which

S n , k ( x ) = ( n x ) k k ! e n x , k = 0 , 1 , .

Here we mainly study the approximation problem of localized Szasz-Mirakjan-Durrmeyer operator. The following part is used to discuss the convergence and approximation of S ~ n , N ( f ) operator, resulting in theorems 1 and 2. The last part is used to study the approximation velocity of S ~ n , N ( f ) operator, and theorem 3 is obtained.

II. THE CONVERGENCE OF LOCALIZED SZASZ-MIRAKJAN-DURRMeyer OPERATOR

Let's start with the following lemma.

Lemma 1 [28] Let x > 0 and y ( , + ) , Then

| e n x k = 0 [ n x + y n ] ( n x ) k k ! 1 2 π y x e 1 2 u 2 d u | A x 3 x + 1 n ( x + | y | ) 3

Where A is a constant. If x = 0 , y > 0 , change y x to , then the conclusion is valid.

Using this lemma, we come to the following conclusion

Theorem 1: Let f C [ 0 , ) and N = N ( n , x ) , make

  1. ( N n x ) / n uniformly bounded on [ x 1 , x 2 ] , where 0 < x 1 < x 2 < .
  2. lim n N n x n = C ( x ) preserving uniform convergence in [ x 1 , x 2 ] , Then, it is established that there is
( 5 ) lim n S ~ n , N ( f ; x ) = f ( x ) 2 π C ( x ) x e 1 2 u 2 d u

uniformly in [ x 1 , x 2 ] .

Proof: Let

δ n = ( N n x ) / n , G = sup n 1 { | δ n | } ,

For η > 0 , define the optical sliding mode

ω ( f ; η ) = max x , y [ 0 , x 2 + G ] , | x y | < η | f ( x ) f ( y ) |

According to the property of the optical sliding mode, if λ > 0 , then

( 6 ) ω ( f ; λ η ) ( 1 + λ ) ω ( f , η )

If x [ x 1 , x 2 ] , then

S ~ n , N ( f ; x ) = k = 0 N n 0 + ( f ( t ) f ( x ) ) ( n t ) k k ! e n t d t S n , k ( x ) + k = 0 N f ( x ) S n , k ( x ) I 1 + I 2

According to (6) and (4)

| I 1 | k = 0 N n 0 + | f ( t ) f ( x ) | S n , k ( t ) d t S n , k ( x ) ω ( f ; 1 n ) k = 0 N n 0 + ( 1 + n | t x | ) S n , k ( t ) d t S n , k ( x ) ω ( f ; 1 n ) ( k = 0 N S n , k ( x ) + k = 0 N n 0 + n | t x | S n , k ( t ) d t S n , k ( x ) )
( 7 ) ω ( f ; 1 n ) ( 1 + ( k = 0 n 0 + n ( t x ) 2 S n , k ( t ) d t S n , k ( x ) ) 1 2 ) ω ( f ; 1 n ) ( 1 + 2 n x + 2 n )

From lemma 1, we have

( 8 ) I 2 = f ( x ) e n x k = 0 n x + n n δ n ( n x ) k k ! = f ( x ) { 1 2 π n δ n x e 1 2 u 2 d u + O ( x 2 3 x 2 + 1 n ( x 1 + n | δ n | ) 3 ) }

From (7) and (8), it can be concluded that (5) converges uniformly in [ x 1 , x 2 ] . In a similar way to Theorem 1, we get the following conclusion.

Theorem 2: Let f C [ 0 , ) and N = N ( n , x ) , make

  1. ( N n x ) / n is uniformly bounded on [ x 1 , x 2 ] , where, 0 x 1 < x 2 < .
  2. lim n N n x n = C ( x ) , | C ( x ) | ρ > 0 maintain consistent convergence within [ x 1 , x 2 ] , then lim n S ~ n , N ( f ; x ) = f ( x ) 2 π C ( x ) x e 1 2 u 2 d u is uniformly true on [ x 1 , x 2 ] . When x = 0 , think of C ( x ) x as .

Corollary 1: Let f C [ 0 , ) and N = N ( n , x ) , make

  1. ( N n x ) / n is uniformly bounded on [ x 1 , x 2 ] , where, 0 x 1 < x 2 < .
  • (ii) lim n N n x n = preserving uniform convergence in [ x 1 , x 2 ] , then lim n S ~ n , N ( f ; x ) = f ( x ) is uniformly true on [ x 1 , x 2 ] .

Corollary 2: Let f C [ 0 , ) and x 0 ( 0 , ) , If ( N n x 0 ) / n is bounded, and when n , ( N n x 0 ) / n does not converge to , Then lim n S ~ n , N ( f ; x 0 ) = f ( x 0 ) must result in f ( x 0 ) = 0

Corollary 3: Let x 0 [ 0 , ) , If ( N n x 0 ) / n is bounded, then

lim n S ~ n , N ( f ; x 0 ) = f ( x 0 )

is true for any f C [ 0 , ) ,

If and only if

lim n N n x 0 n = istrue .

III. APPROXIMATION SPEED OF SZÁSZ-MIRAKJA-DURRMAYER DEFORMATION LOCALIZATION OPERATOR

A similar result is obtained for the localization Szasz-Mirakjan-Durrmeyer operator S ~ n , N ( f , x ) as follows.

Theorem 3: Let f C α for fixed x > 0 , there is δ > 0

Make f conform to

( 9 ) | f ( t ) f ( x ) t x | C ( x , δ ) ,

in which | t x | δ , and t 0 . And N = N ( n , x ) ,

( 10 ) lim n inf n N n x n x ln ( n ) > 1

is true, then

( 11 ) sup n 1 n | S ~ n , N ( f ; x ) f ( x ) | <

If f ( x ) exists, and N = N ( n , x ) , (13) is true, then

( 12 ) lim n n ( S ~ n , N ( f ; x ) f ( x ) ) = 0.

Proof: (11) first. We note that

S ~ n , N ( f ; x ) f ( x ) = k = 0 N n 0 + ( f ( t ) f ( x ) ) S n , k ( t ) d t S n , k ( x ) f ( x ) k = N + 1 S n , k ( x )
I 1 = k = 0 N n 0 + ( f ( t ) f ( x ) ) S n , k ( t ) d t S n , k ( x ) = k = 0 N n | t x | < δ ( f ( t ) f ( x ) ) S n , k ( t ) d t S n , k ( x ) + k = 0 N n | t x | δ ( f ( t ) f ( x ) ) S n , k ( t ) d t S n , k ( x )
( 14 ) I 1 1 + I 1 2

From (9) and (4) we have

\begin{array}{l} \left| I _ {1 1} \right| \leq \sum_ {k = 0} ^ {N} n \int_ {| t - x | < \delta} \left| f (t) - f (x) \right| S _ {n, k} (t) \, dt \, S _ {n, k} (x) \\\leq C (x, \delta) \sum_ {k = 0} ^ {N} n \int_ {| t - x | < \delta} \left| t - x \right| S _ {n, k} (t) \, dt \, S _ {n, k} (x) \\\leq C (x, \delta) \left(\sum_ {k = 0} ^ {\infty} n \int_ {0} ^ {\infty} (t - x) ^ {2} S _ {n, k} (t) \, dt \, S _ {n, k} (x)\right) ^ {1 / 2} \\\leq \frac{C (x , \delta)}{\sqrt{n}} \sqrt{\frac{2 n x + 2}{n}} \tag{15} \\end{array}
( 16 ) | I 1 2 | = k = 0 N n | t x | δ | f ( t ) f ( x ) | S n , k ( t ) d t S n , k ( x ) k = 0 N n | t x | δ | f ( t ) | S n , k ( t ) d t S n , k ( x ) + k = 0 N n | t x | δ | f ( x ) | S n , k ( t ) d t S n , k ( x ) = I 1 2 + I 1 2
  • n > α , 由 f C α , 可得
I 12 A k = 0 N n | t x | δ e α t e n t ( n t ) k k ! d t S n , k ( x ) A δ 2 k = 0 N n [ 0 t 2 e ( n α ) t ( n t ) k k ! d t 2 x 0 t e ( n α ) t ( n t ) k k ! d t + x 2 0 e ( n α ) t ( n t ) k k ! d t ] S n , k ( x ) = A δ 2 k = 0 N n [ ( k + 2 ) ( k + 1 ) n k ( n α ) k + 3 2 x ( k + 1 ) n k ( n α ) k + 2 + x 2 n k ( n α ) k + 1 ] S n , k ( x )
= A δ 2 k = 0 N ( n n α ) k + 1 [ ( k + 2 ) ( k + 1 ) ( n α ) 2 2 x ( k + 1 ) ( n α ) + x 2 ] S n , k ( x ) = A δ 2 k = 0 N ( n n α ) k + 1 [ ( k n n x n α ) 2 + α ( 2 n α ) ( n α ) 2 ( k n ) 2 2 x n α α ( 2 n α ) ( n α ) 2 x 2 + 3 k ( n α ) 2 + 1 ( n α ) 2 ] S n , k ( x ) A δ 2 k = 0 N ( n n α ) k + 1 [ ( k n n x n α ) 2 + α ( 2 n α ) ( n α ) 2 ( k n ) 2 + 3 n ( n α ) 2 k n + 1 ( n α ) 2 ] S n , k ( x ) A δ 2 [ J 1 + J 2 + J 3 + J 4 ]

According to (2)

J 1 = k = 0 N ( n n α ) k + 1 ( k n n x n α ) 2 ( n x ) k k ! e n x = n n α e n x + n n x n α k = 0 N ( k n n x n α ) 2 ( n n x n α ) k k ! e n n x n α n n α e α n x n α ( k = 0 ( k n n x n α ) 2 ( n n x n α ) k k ! e n n x n α ) 1 n α n x n α e a n x n α e n d a r r a y

so

( 17 ) J 1 = O x , α ( 1 n ) .

According to (1)

J 2 = k = 0 N ( n n α ) k + 1 α ( 2 n α ) ( n α ) 2 ( k n ) 2 ( n x ) k k ! e n x = α ( 2 n α ) n ( n α ) 3 e α n x n α k = 0 N ( k n ) 2 ( n n x n α ) k k ! e n n x n α α ( 2 n α ) n ( n α ) 3 e α n x n α [ ( n x n α ) 2 + x n α ]

According to (21) and (22),

( 18 ) J 2 = O x , α ( 1 n )

By the same token, we can obtain from (1)

( 19 ) J 3 = 3 n 3 x ( n α ) 4 e α n x n α = O x , α ( 1 n )
( 20 ) J 4 = n ( n α ) 3 e α n x n α = O x , α ( 1 n )

Combined with (17)-(20), we can get

( 21 ) I 1 2 = O x , α ( 1 n )

According to (4)

( 22 ) I 1 2 " = | f ( x ) | k = 0 N n | t x | δ S n , k ( t ) d t S n , k ( x ) | f ( x ) | k = 0 N n | t x | δ ( t x ) 2 δ 2 S n , k ( t ) d t S n , k ( x ) | f ( x ) | δ 2 2 n x + 2 n 2 A e α x ( 2 n x + 2 ) δ 2 n 2
( 23 ) | I 1 2 | = O x , α ( 1 n )

Then, from (15) and (23),

( 24 ) | I 1 | = O x , α ( 1 n )

According to literature [28]

( 25 ) | I 2 | | f ( x ) | 2 π n ln ( n ) + O ( | f ( x ) | 3 x + 1 n x ( ln ( n ) ) 3 )

Combine (24) with (25) to get, existence n 0 such that when n > n 0 , there is

| S ~ n , N ( f , x ) f ( x ) | C ( x , δ , α ) 1 n

In which C ( x , δ , α ) is a constant that depends only on x , δ , and α , So (11) is true. Next, we prove (12). Only certificate

( 26 ) | I 1 1 | = o x ( 1 n )

In fact, if there is f ( x ) , then for any ε > 0 , there is δ > 0 , and exist

( 27 ) | f ( t ) f ( x ) f ( x ) ( t x ) | < ε | t x | , | t x | < δ ,

from (27)

( 28 ) | I 1 1 | | f ( x ) k = 0 N n | t x | < δ ( t x ) S n , k ( t ) d t S n , k ( x ) | + ε k = 0 N n | t x | < δ | t x | S n , k ( t ) d t S n , k ( x ) H 1 + H 2
H 1 = | f ( x ) k = 0 N n | t x | < δ ( t x ) S n , k ( t ) d t S n , k ( x ) | = | f ( x ) k = 0 n | t x | < δ ( t x ) S n , k ( t ) d t S n , k ( x ) f ( x ) k = N + 1 n | t x | < δ ( t x ) S n , k ( t ) d t S n , k ( x ) = | f ( x ) k = 0 n | t x | δ ( t x ) S n , k ( t ) d t S n , k ( x ) + 1 n f ( x ) k = N + 1 n | t x | < δ ( t x ) S n , k ( t ) d t S n , k ( x ) = | f ( x ) k = 0 N n | t x | δ ( t x ) S n , k ( t ) d t S n , k ( x ) + 1 n f ( x ) k = N + 1 n 0 ( t x ) S n , k ( t ) d t S n , k ( x ) | | f ( x ) | δ k = 0 N n 0 ( t x ) 2 S n , k ( t ) d t S n , k ( x ) + | f ( x ) | k = N + 1 n 0 | t x | S n , k ( t ) d t S n , k ( x ) + 1 n K 1 + K 2 + 1 n e n d a r r a y
( 29 ) K 1 | f ( x ) | δ 2 n x + 2 n 2
( 29 ) K 2 | f ( x ) | k = N + 1 n 0 t S n , k ( t ) d t S n , k ( x ) + x | f ( x ) | k = N + 1 S n , k ( x )
2 | f ( x ) | k = N + 1 k n S n , k ( x ) + x | f ( x ) | k = N + 1 S n , k ( x ) 2 x | f ( x ) | k = N S n , k ( x ) + x | f ( x ) | k = N + 1 S n , k ( x )

And then we know from (25)

( 30 ) K 2 = o x ( 1 n )

According to (4)

( 31 ) H 2 = ε k = 0 N n | t x | < δ | t x | S n , k ( t ) d t S n , k ( x ) ε ( k = 0 n | t x | < δ ( t x ) 2 S n , k ( t ) d t S n , k ( x ) ) 1 / 2 ε n 2 n x + 2 n

(26) is established by combining (29) with (31).

Then, from (23), (25) and (26), when n is sufficiently large, there is

| S ~ n , N ( f , x ) f ( x ) | C ( x , δ , α ) ε n

in which C ( x , δ , α ) is a constant that depends only on x , δ and α , so (12) is true. So the theorem is proved.

References

30 Cites in Article
  1. Otto Szász (1950). Generalization of Bernstein's Polynomials to the infinite interval.
  2. Z Ditzian,V Totik (1987). Weighted Moduli of Smoothness.
  3. Zoltán Finta,N Govil,Vijay Gupta (2007). Some results on modified Szász–Mirakjan operators.
  4. A (2008). A generalization of Szász–Mirakyan operators based on <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" altimg="si1.gif" display="inline" overflow="scroll"><mml:mi>q</mml:mi></mml:math>-integers.
  5. Naokant Deo (2008). Direct result on exponential-type operators.
  6. Z Finta (2005). On converse approximation theorems.
  7. Jesús De,La Cal,J Cárcamo (2003). On uniform approximation by someclassical Bernstein-type operators.
  8. José Adell,Alberto Lekuona (2008). Best constants in preservation of global smoothness for Szász–Mirakyan operators.
  9. N Govil,Z Finta,Vijay Gupta (2007). Some results on modified Szász-Mirakjan operators.
  10. Z Walczak (2003). On certain positive linear operators in polynomial weight spaces.
  11. R Yang,J Xiong,F Cao (2003). Strong Converse Inequality for Modified Szász Operators.
  12. Ying Wang,Xuezhi Mao,Liwei Bai (1997). Soft Control for Swarm Aggregations.
  13. Oktay Duman,M Özarslan (2007). Szász–Mirakjan type operators providing a better error estimation.
  14. J Tian,W Chen,Ch Liu (2000). On modifying the Local saturation Theorem of Szász-Gamma type operators.
  15. Jesús De,La Cal,J Cárcamo (2007). On the approximation of convex functions by Bernstein-type operators.
  16. Guanzhen Zhou,Songping Zhou (1999). A remark on a modified Szász-Mirakjan operator.
  17. S Mazhar,V Totik (1985). Approximation by modified Szász operators.
  18. Heinz-Gerd Lehnhoff (1984). On a modified Szasz-Mirakjan-operator.
  19. E Omey (1986). Note on operators of Szász-Mirakyan type.
  20. X Sun (1994). On the convergence of the modified Szász-Mirakjan operator.
  21. Shuang Xu,Kai Wang,Wenxin Lai,Zechen Luo,Paixin Chen,Honglin Yan,Ruiqi Guan (1989). Insight into local defect resonance and its in-situ measurement based on flexible nano-composite sensors.
  22. H Kasana,G Prasad,P Agrawal,A Sahai (1985). MODIFIED SZASZ OPERATORS.
  23. Chungou Zhang,Null- Wang (2009). THE COMPLETE ASYMPTOTIC EXPANSIONS FOR THE SZÁSZ–MIRAKIAN-TYPE OPERATORS.
  24. V Gupta (1995). Simultaneous approximation by Szász-Durrmeyer operators.
  25. Vijay Gupta,Muhammad Noor (2006). Convergence of derivatives for certain mixed Szasz–Beta operators.
  26. Vijay Gupta,Jyoti Sinha (2008). Direct results on certain Szasz–Mirakyan operators.
  27. J Grof (1980). über approximation durch polynome mit Belegfunktionen.
  28. Linsen Xie,Tingfan Xie (2008). Approximation theorems for localized sz<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" altimg="si1.gif" overflow="scroll"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>´</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mover></mml:math>sz–Mirakjan operators.
  29. Grażyna Krech (2016). Some approximation results for operators of Szász-Mirakjan-Durrmeyer type.
  30. Lin Zhi,Peng Cheng,Wen Tao,; Xu,Xiao Wei (2021). Approximation Properties of -Szász-Mirakjan-Durrmeyer Operators.

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Ma Yingdian, Sun Yue. 2026. "Approximation of the Localized Szász-Mirakjan-Durrmeyer Operators". Global Journal of Science Frontier Research - F: Mathematics & Decision GJSFR-F Volume 23 (GJSFR Volume 23 Issue F5).

Download Citation

This academic article discusses the approximation of functions using localized Szász-Mirakjan-Durrmeyer operators, highlighting convergence properties.
Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJSFR

Print ISSN 0975-5896

e-ISSN 2249-4626

Keywords
Classification
GJSFR-F Classification LCC: QA221
Version of record

v1.2

Issue date
September 12, 2023

Language
English
Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

Article Matrices
Total Views: 515
Total Downloads: 44
All Trends

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

Approximation of the Localized Szász-Mirakjan-Durrmeyer Operators

Ma Yingdian
Ma Yingdian Huainan Normal University
Sun Yue
Sun Yue