The objective of this study is to identify the different activities that motivate individuals to use the Internet in Cameroon. Specifically, this is to show that activities related to the search for information online, academic activities online, activities on digital social media, listening and downloading music online, online watching and movie download, online purchases and sales, online administrative services and online sports activities motivate the use of the Internet by individuals in Cameroon. The methodology implemented uses data from the survey of the practice of new digital media in Cameroon (PRANOME) carried out in 2021 in the cities of Yaoundé, Douala, Mfou, and Soa under the supervision of the Center of Research in Economic and Management (CEREG) of the University of Yaoundé 2-Soa in Cameroon. The results of the estimates made on the basis of the binary Logit model show that Internet use has a positive and significant effect at the 1% level on the activities of listening and downloading online music, watching and for downloading movies online; searching for information online and on digital social media.
## I. INTRODUCTION
The Internet was the result of vast military and scientific research projects in the sixties in the United States, and one of the most important revolutions in the modern history of mankind, sometimes assimilated today to the third industrial revolution (Pénard and Rallet, 2014; Rifkin, 2012). Internet can be defined as a global network which itself is englobed by a multitude of computer networks of local, regional, national or continental dimension linked to each other (Balle, 2006). This medium which is in fact a dynamic interconnection of multiple computer subnets from around the world, has undeniably brought a touch in the reduction of time and distances between people, the whole earth would have become a global village in short because all the economic agents (households, businesses, administrations, individuals,...) who can be able to connect anywhere in the world. Control of Internet service is nowadays and will remain for a long time to come a symbol of the power of States, an important engine of growth and a lever of economic and social development (Niebel, 2018). The Internet is the bedrock of the information society in which we live today in the world, so we must not stay away from this vast planetary movement which is fatal for those regions of the world that have deliberately chosen to marginalize themselves. Internet access and even its practice remains today a real equation to be resolved in several countries of the planet and especially for those of Central Africa located south of the Sahara.
Over the past two decades Africans have become more interested in the Internet, this can be seen through their daily connection time which continues to grow on the continent. This connection is made through several means, namely browsing on phones, computers, using the connection speed in Internet cafe, workplaces and also from homes. This Internet penetration in Africa is increasing by around $27\%$ per year on average according to the estimates of the International Telecommunications Union, which adds that nevertheless Africa remains the least connected continent with only $16\%$ of the population with Internet access is half that of the Asia-Pacific zone between 2009 and 2017.
Internet made its appearance in Cameroon in April 1997 with Cameroon Telecommunication (CAMTEL) as the main access provider. But it was not until two years later in April 1999 with the opening of a node in the city of Douala, the economic metropolis, that the Internet began to be disseminated and spread throughout the national territory. Although access to broadband (2Mbits) has been easier since 2005 with the use of optical fiber and docking with the SAT-3/WASC cable, the development of the sector is hampered by the state of infrastructure and the slow deployment of optical fiber. In order to improve the quality of the network, an optical fiber line with a 6,000 kilometer long submarine cable was built connecting the towns of Kribi in Cameroon and Fortaleza in Brazil (connecting Africa and the Americas), which has been operational since September 4, 2018. Note that this fiber optic submarine cable becomes the fourth fiber optic submarine cable to land in Cameroon after the SAT-3, the Wacs and the NCNCS (Nigeria and Cameroon Net Work Cable System).
According to the Telecommunications Regulatory Agency (ART), Cameroon has at her disposal more than 25,000 kilometers of fiber optic lines internally, for connection speeds ranging from 56 Kilobits/s to 2048 Kilobits/s on average; the country has more than 50 internet service providers. The number of Internet subscribers continues to increase in Cameroon; we have gone from 3,547 subscribers in 2006 to more than 10 million in 2021 according to the Ministry of Posts and Telecommunications. Thus, 6 million Internet users are regularly active on the Internet today, ie more than $26\%$ of the population, estimated at more than 25 million. This increase in the number of subscribers proves that the Internet has become an essential consumer good in the world today, its importance appears unequivocal because many Internet users can no longer do without this network (Bourreau and Perrot, 2020; Beuve et al., 2020).
In Cameroon, studies on Internet access have mostly focused on the various first and second order digital divides (Bakehe et al., 2017; Fambeu and Bakehe, 2015; Tamakwe, 2013; Mukoko, 2012). Thus the originality of our study to outline is to be able to study what exactly individuals do on the Internet in Cameroon when they are connected, hence the importance of our study. We rely on this work on a theoretical literature of innovation and the economics of networks (Pénard and al., 2015; Vega-Redondo, 2007; Cohendet and al, 2003; Bandura 2003; 1997; Pénard, 2003; Buskens, 2002; Rauch and Casella, 2001; Slikker and Van den Nouweland, 2001; Arrow, 1998; Gallegati and Kirman, 1999; Rogers, 1995; Mallein and Toussaint, 1994; Ram, 1987; Katz and Shapiro, 1985). And on an empirical literature that shows how Internet use can be motivated by the practice of certain online activities (VanHoose, 2021; Poulet and Ruffo de Calabre, 2021; Routabi and Bennami,2021; Daniel, 2020, Zhao, 2020; Kretschmer and Peukert, 2020; Schweitzer, 2019; Aguiar and Martens, 2016; Penard and al., 2015; Zolkepli and Kamarulzaman, 2015; Lee and Ma, 2012; Bekkers and al., 2012; Cheung and al., 2010; Diddi and LaRose, 2006).
The objective of this study is to identify the different activities that motivate individuals to access the Internet in Cameroon. As a hypothesis, it is a question of showing that the use of the Internet has a positive effect on the search for information online, academic activities online, digital social media, listening and downloading of music online, online watching and downloading of movies, online shopping and sales, online government services and online sporting activities. To carry out our study, the research methodology is focused on an empirical study which consists in identifying the activities of individuals on the Internet in Cameroon. We are using data from the survey of the practice of new digital media in Cameroon (PRANOME) carried out in 2021 in the cities of Yaoundé, Douala, Mfou, and Soa under the supervision of the Center of Research in Economic and Management (CEREG) from the University of Yaoundé
2-Soa in Cameroon. The influence of Internet use on the activities of individuals is analyzed using a dichotomous Logit model. In the rest of our work, we show in turn the review of the literature, the methodology used, the descriptive statistics, the results of the estimations and the analysis and interpretations.
## II. LITERATURE REVIEW
In this part, we will bring out on the one hand, the theoretical literature which revolves around the theory of the diffusion of an innovation and the economic theory of networks contributing to the use of the internet, and on the other hand, the empirical literature which presents the activities of individuals on the Internet which motivates them to use it more and more.
### a) Theoretical Literature
Several theories have been developed regarding the adoption of an innovation in general and regarding Internet access in particular. We have among others the theory of diffusion of Rogers (1995), the theory of resistance to an innovation of Ram (1987), the theory of the social acceptability of an innovation of Mallein and Toussaint (1994), the theory Bandura's social learning and self-efficacy (1997; 2003). Beyond the theories related to adoption, a capital theory that explains the adoption of the Internet which is a network good is the theory of network economics (VegaRedondo, 2007; Cohendet and al, 2003; Buskens, 2002; Rauch and Casella, 2001; Slikker and Van den Nouweland, 2001; Arrow, 1998; Gallegati and Kirman, 1999).
Thus the theory of the three layers of the network economy affirms that for a network good like the Internet to be able to gain notoriety by reducing digital divides it is essential that these three layers be highlighted. Network services and Internet applications correspond to the upper layer of the network (Third layer), the lower layer corresponds to the physical infrastructure (first layer) and the intermediate layer to the info-structure or to the control or control networks. Infrastructure management (second layer). These different layers characterize in a way a network good (Internet) comprising both a physical infrastructure (link, switches, etc.) and the services provided on this infrastructure. Network economics theory shows that network services develop economies of scale among consumers (Internet users) and producers (online service providers). These economies of scale are at the origin of positive feedback phenomena between supply and demand for services and generate original diffusion dynamics (Penard and al., 2015; Penard, 2003; Katz and Shapiro, 1985).
### b) Empirical literature
The empirical literature shows that individuals connect to the Internet for searching online information, for online academic activities of which there is a positive effect of Internet use on the practice of academic activities (Allen and al., 2020; Daniel, 2020, Zhao, 2020; Kaplan and Haenlein, 2016) and searching for information online (Penard and al., 2015; Lee and Ma, 2012; Cheung and al., 2009; Cheung and al., 2008; Diddi and LaRose, 2006). Similarly, studies have shown a strong influence of Internet use on activities linked to social networks (Zolkepli and Kamarulzaman, 2015; 2011; Pai and Arnott, 2013; Boyd and Ellison, 2013; Cardon, 2011; Kaplan and Haenlein, 2011; Sledgianowski and Kulviwat, 2009). Thus the use of the Internet has a positive effect on the activities of individuals related to listening and downloading music and movies online (Kretschmer and Peukert, 2020; Schweitzer, 2019; Aguiar and Martens, 2016; Crane, 2014; Sonnac, 2013).
The administrative services have not been left out since the advent of the corona virus (Covid-19) pandemic in the world, the first case of which was declared on March 06, 2020 in Cameroon, the use of e-administration continues to increase in the country because of the application of barrier measures taken by the government. This as well as that there is a positive effect of the use of Internet on the activities related to the administrative services (Routabi and Bennami, 2021; Satry and Belkadi, 2019; Bekkers and al., 2011; Homburg, 2008; Bekkers and Homburg, 2005; Wimmer and al., 2005). Internet adoption also has a positive effect on online shopping and sales (VanHoose, 2021; Bloomenhal, 2021; Le Guel and al., 2005; Ziaul Hoq and al., 2005; Manchanda and al., 2002; Johnson and Whang, 2002) and on online sports activities (Naraine and Parent, 2017).
## III. METHODOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK
In this part, we will present the data of our study from a statistical survey, the variables of our study and the presentation of the study model.
### a) Study data
To carry out our study, we used data from the survey of the practice of new digital media in Cameroon (PRANOME) carried out in 2021 in the cities of Yaoundé, Douala, Mfou, and Soa under the supervision of the Center of Research in Economic and Management We thus have:
(CEREG) from the University of Yaoundé 2-Soa in Cameroon. Our unit of analysis is the individual, so 1057 observations were retained in the sample after purification of the PRANOME database.
### b) Study variables
The variables that we have retained to show the effect of Internet use on the activities of individuals online are the dependent variable and the explanatory variables. The dependent variable Y represents the use of the Internet by individuals which is presented in our database by the access of individuals to the Internet. The PRANOME survey shows that an individual who accesses the Internet actually uses it. The independent variables can be listed in two categories: the first represent the variables related to the activities of individuals on the Internet which are the search for information, academic activities, digital social networks, listening and downloading of music online, watching and downloading movies online, buying and selling online, administrative services and online sports activities. The second control the first and are made up of socioeconomic and sociodemographic variables such as sex, age, marital status, having a diploma, having a job, place of residence, income, access to a mobile phone and/or to a computer.
### c) The binary Logit model
We construct a binary variable Yi which is equal to 1 if the individual uses the Internet and 0 if the individual does not use the Internet. We can then associate with this variable Yi, a value $\mathbf{Y}\mathbf{i}^{*}$ which corresponds to the usefulness of the individual when he chooses to connect. This variable $\mathbf{Y}\mathbf{i}^{*}$ depends on the activities of individuals on the Internet and on the socioeconomic and socio-demographic characteristics noted (Xi) and on an error term (Ui), namely
$$
Y_{i}^{*}=X_{i}\beta+U_{i}.
$$
This utility is random due to the presence of the error term Ui. We can then define a selection criterion for the individual. If the utility he gets from using the Internet is greater than a certain value (C), he will choose to connect to the Internet, but if his utility is less than this value, he will choose not to connect of which not to use the Internet.
$$
\left\{ \begin{array}{l} \mathrm{Y}_i = 1 \text{ if } \mathrm{Y}_i^* > \mathrm{C} \\ \text{With } \mathrm{Y}_i = 1 \text{ if the individual uses the Internet and } \mathrm{Y}_i = 0 \text{ otherwise} \\ \mathrm{Y}_i = 0 \text{ if } \mathrm{Y}_i^* \leq \mathrm{C} \end{array} \right. \tag{1}
$$
The realization of $\mathbf{Y}\mathbf{i}$ (observable) comes from an underlying model, expressed by the latent (unobservable) variables $\mathbf{Y}\mathbf{i}^*$.
The decision rule then becomes:
$$
\left\{
\begin{array}{l}
P (\mathrm {Y i} = 1) = P (\mathrm {X i} \beta + \mathrm {U i} > \mathrm {C}) = 1 - P (\mathrm {U i} \leq \mathrm {C} - \mathrm {X i} \beta) \\
P (\mathrm {Y i} = 0) = P (\mathrm {X i} \beta + \mathrm {U i} \leq \mathrm {C}) = P (\mathrm {U i} \leq \mathrm {C} - \mathrm {X i} \beta)
\end{array}
\right.
\tag {2}
$$
$P(\mathbf{Y_i} = 1)$ denotes the probability that the individual will use the Internet and $P(\mathbf{Y_i} = 0)$ the probability that he will not use the Internet. In order to calculate these probabilities, it is necessary to specify a statistical distribution for the error terms (Ui). Two possibilities are generally used. It is assumed that the error term follows a normal distribution (Probit model) or that they follow the logistic distribution (Logit model). So in our work, we choose to use the binary Logit model because of its fluidity in handling. The Logit model has the following properties:
- The error term $\mathsf{U}$ follows the logistic law $\Lambda$ with mean 0 and standard deviation $\prod 2 / 3$ or $\cup -\Lambda$ (0; $\prod 2 / 3$ ).
- $\rightarrow$ The distribution function is $\wedge(X\beta) = \frac{\exp(|X\beta|)}{1 + \exp(|X\beta|)}$ (3) As the threshold value (C) can be normalized to 0 (Thomas, 2000), and given the logistic distribution, we can write the possibilities of Internet use as follows:
$$
\left\{
\begin{array}{l}
P(Y_i = 1) = \frac{\exp(X_i \beta)}{1 + \exp(X_i \beta)} \\
P(Y_i = 0) = \frac{\exp(-X_i \beta)}{1 + \exp(-X_i \beta)}
\end{array}
\right.
\tag{4}
$$
$\mathsf{P}(\mathsf{Y}\mathbf{i} = 1)$ denotes the probability that the individual uses the Internet and $\mathsf{P}(\mathsf{Y}\mathbf{i} = 0)$ represents the probability that the individual does not use the Internet.
The estimation of the Logit model is based on the maximization of the log-likelihood. Hence we have the likelihood function which is written as follows:
$$
1-yi & yi
$$
$$
L (y, x, \beta) = \prod_ {i = 1} ^ {N} \left[ \frac{1}{1 + \exp (\exists X i \beta)} \right] \left[ \frac{\exp (\exists X i \beta)}{1 + \exp (\exists X i \beta)} \right] \tag{5}
$$
By linearizing the likelihood function, we obtain the log-likelihood function as follows:
$$
lnL(y,x,\beta) = -\sum_{i=1}^{N}\{ln[1 + \exp(\mathbf{X}i\beta)] - Y_i.\mathbf{X}i.\beta\}
$$
## IV. RESULTS
We present in this part results, descriptive statistics, the results of the logistic regression and the marginal effects of the binary Logit model.
### a) Descriptive statistics results
The results of the descriptive statistics in Table 1 show that on average $90.5\%$ of the individuals surveyed have access to the Internet, $96\%$ have at least one mobile phone, $21.8\%$ have at least one computer, $52.6\%$ are male (the female sex being the reference category), $56.4\%$ are single (the couple being the reference category), $70.5\%$ live in an urban area (the semi-urban area being the reference category), $99.1\%$ have at least the first diploma of schools studies, $56.6\%$ have at least one job in the formal or informal sector. $76.7\%$ and $54.6\%$ of individuals say they connect to the Internet for the activities of listening and downloading music online and watching and downloading movies online respectively. On average $59.7\%$ of individuals go online for digital social media activities, $75.5\%$ for the search of information, $22.2\%$ for administrative services, $21\%$ for sports activities, $20,1\%$ for online purchases and sales(e-commerce).
Table 1: Descriptive statistics
<table><tr><td>Variables</td><td>Definitions</td><td>Observations</td><td>Means</td></tr><tr><td>Internet access</td><td>1 = Yes 0 = No</td><td>1057</td><td>0.905 (0.122)</td></tr><tr><td>Watching/downloading movies</td><td>1 = Yes 0 = No</td><td>1057</td><td>0.546 (0.498)</td></tr><tr><td>Listen/download music</td><td>1 = Yes 0 = No</td><td>1057</td><td>0.767 (0.423)</td></tr><tr><td>Digital social media</td><td>1 = Yes 0 = No</td><td>1057</td><td>0.597 (0.491)</td></tr><tr><td>Information search</td><td>1 = Yes 0 = No</td><td>1057</td><td>0.755 (0.431)</td></tr><tr><td>Academic activities</td><td>1 = Yes 0 = No</td><td>1057</td><td>0.562 (0.496)</td></tr><tr><td>Administrative services</td><td>1 = Yes 0 = No</td><td>1057</td><td>0.222 (0.416)</td></tr><tr><td>Sports activities</td><td>1 = Yes 0 = No</td><td>1057</td><td>0.210 (0.408)</td></tr><tr><td>Purchases/sales activities</td><td>1 = Yes 0 = No</td><td>1057</td><td>0.201 (0.401)</td></tr><tr><td>Mobile phone access</td><td>1 = Yes 0 = No</td><td>1057</td><td>0.960 (0.197)</td></tr><tr><td>Computer Access</td><td>1 = Yes 0 = No</td><td>1057</td><td>0.218 (0.500)</td></tr><tr><td>Sex</td><td>1 = Male 0 = Female (Ref)</td><td>1057</td><td>0.526 (0.500)</td></tr><tr><td>Age</td><td>Quantitative</td><td>1057</td><td>30.48 (10.66)</td></tr><tr><td>Marital status</td><td>1 = Single 0 = Couple (Ref)</td><td>1057</td><td>0.564 (0.496)</td></tr><tr><td>Place of residence</td><td>1 = Urban 0 = Semi Urban (Ref)</td><td>1057</td><td>0.705 (0.456)</td></tr><tr><td>Monthly income</td><td>Quantitative</td><td>1057</td><td>10.57 (0.684)</td></tr><tr><td>Diploma</td><td>1 = Yes 0 = No</td><td>1057</td><td>0.991 (0.097)</td></tr><tr><td>Job</td><td>1 = Yes 0 = No</td><td>1057</td><td>0.566 (0.496)</td></tr></table>
### b) Logistic Regression Results: Analysis and interpretations
Table 2 of the results of the model estimates highlights the coefficients and the marginal effects. The numerical value of the coefficients of the dichotomous Logit model not having a direct interpretation, the effect of the variables on the probability of individuals to use the Internet is assessed through the calculation of the marginal effects. Table 2 below indicates that the model is globally significant, because the limited probability associated with this estimate is less than $1\%$ (Prob> chi2 = 0.0001). The model's goodness-of-fit indicator $(R^2)$ to Mc Fadden data (Pseudo- $R^2 = 0.4725$ ) is quite significant. This shows that the model estimate is valid. It should be noted that the multiple coefficient of determination of Mc Fadden (Pseudo- $R^2$ ) is between 0 and 1 and measures the proportion of the variability of the dependent variable which is explained by the independent variables contained in the model, it indicates the quality of the model.
In view of the results of the estimations obtained and presented in Table 2, we observe a positive and significant relationship on Internet use and the practice of online music listening and downloading, online movie downloading and watching activities, information search, academic activities, administrative services, sports activities, online shopping and sales, digital social media. Indeed, the coefficient associated with the digital social media variable is positive and significant at the $1\%$ level, so the calculation of marginal effects shows that the probability of an individual using the Internet increases by $9.9\%$ when activities on social media digital numbers of this individual grows by $1\%$. Ceteris paribus, the coefficient associated with the variable listening to and downloading music online is positive and significant at the $1\%$ level, thus the calculation of the marginal effects shows that the probability of an individual using the Internet increases by $8.4\%$ when online music listening and downloading by the individual grows by $1\%$. The coefficient associated with the variable watching and downloading movies online is positive and significant at the $1\%$ level, therefore the analysis of the marginal effects shows that the probability of an individual using the Internet increases by $6.8\%$ when watching and this individual's online movie download grows by $1\%$.
The coefficient associated with the online information search variable is positive and significant at the $1\%$ level, so the calculation of the marginal effects shows that the probability of an individual using the Internet increases by $5.1\%$ when the online information search of this individual's line grows by $1\%$. The coefficient associated with the online academic activities variable is positive and significant at the $5\%$ level, so the results of the marginal effects show that the probability of an individual using the Internet increases by $1.9\%$ when the online academic activities of this individual grows by $1\%$. The coefficients associated with the variables online administrative services, online purchases and sales and online sports activities are positive and significant at the $10\%$ level. Thus the calculation of the marginal effects shows that the probability of an individual to use the Internet increases by $0.3\%$ when the online administrative services of the individual increases by $1\%$, this probability increases by $0.9\%$ when the purchases and the individual's online sales increases by $1\%$ and by $1.1\%$ when the individual's online sports activities increase by $1\%$.
It is the same with regard to socioeconomic and socio-demographic variables we observe a positive and significant effect on variables such as having a mobile phone, a monthly income, a job, a diploma. The coefficient associated with the variable having a cell phone (mobile) is positive and significant at the $1\%$ level, therefore the results of the marginal effects show that the probability of an individual to use the Internet increases by $51.1\%$ when the possession cell phone use by this individual grows by $1\%$. The coefficient associated with the variable having a monthly income is positive and significant at the $1\%$ level, therefore the results of the marginal effects show that the probability of an individual to use the Internet increases by $16.4\%$ when the possession of a monthly income by this individual grows by $1\%$. The coefficient associated with the variable having job is positive and significant at $10\%$ level, therefore the results of the marginal effects show that the probability of an individual to use the Internet increases by $1.8\%$ when the possession of a job by this individual grows by $1\%$. The coefficient associated with the variable having diploma is positive and significant at $10\%$ level, therefore the results of the marginal effects show that the probability of an individual to use the Internet increases by $1.6\%$ when the possession of a diploma by this individual grows by $1\%$.
Table 2: Regression of the binary Logit model
<table><tr><td rowspan="2">Variables</td><td colspan="2">Regression</td></tr><tr><td>Internet access Coefficients</td><td>Internet access Marginal effects</td></tr><tr><td>Watching/downloading movies</td><td>2.762 ***(1.942)</td><td>0.068 ***(0.025)</td></tr><tr><td>Listen/Download music</td><td>1.224 ***(1.683)</td><td>0.084 ***(0.012)</td></tr><tr><td>Digital social media</td><td>1.292 ***(1.855)</td><td>0.099 ***(0.087)</td></tr><tr><td>Information search</td><td>0.215 ***(1.593)</td><td>0.051 ***(0.004)</td></tr><tr><td>Academic activities</td><td>3.634 **(1.958)</td><td>0.019 **(0.044)</td></tr><tr><td>Administrative services</td><td>0.927 *(1.587)</td><td>0.003 *(0.009)</td></tr><tr><td>Sports activities</td><td>1,955 *(1.379)</td><td>0.011 *(0.002)</td></tr><tr><td>Purchases/sales activities</td><td>0.752 *(1.620)</td><td>0.009 *(0.007)</td></tr><tr><td>Mobile phone access</td><td>6.399 ***(2.582)</td><td>0.511 ***(0.017)</td></tr><tr><td>Computer Access</td><td>0.443(1.566)</td><td>0.011(0.005)</td></tr><tr><td>sex</td><td>1,251(1.449)</td><td>0.033(0.001)</td></tr><tr><td>Age</td><td>0.145(0.603)</td><td>0.037(0.002)</td></tr><tr><td>Age squared</td><td>-0.0107(0.0104)</td><td>-0.027(0.008)</td></tr><tr><td>Single</td><td>1,256(1.023)</td><td>0.005(0.002)</td></tr><tr><td>Place of residence Urban</td><td>1.031(1.551)</td><td>0.023(0.006)</td></tr><tr><td>Monthly income</td><td>4.089 ***(1.713)</td><td>0.164 ***(0.026)</td></tr><tr><td>Diploma</td><td>0.249*(0.360)</td><td>0.016*(0.002)</td></tr><tr><td>Job</td><td>1.637 *(1.393)</td><td>0.018 *(0.006)</td></tr><tr><td>Constant</td><td>-42.70 **(21.06)</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Observations</td><td>1057</td></tr><tr><td>LR Chi2</td><td>29.74</td></tr><tr><td>Prob> Chi2</td><td>0.0001</td></tr><tr><td>Nickname R2</td><td>0.4725</td></tr><tr><td>Log likelihood</td><td>-16,599</td></tr></table>
Significance: $\star$ (1%), $\star \star$ (5%), $\star \star \star$ (10%)
## V. CONCLUSION
The objective of this study was to identify the different activities that motivate individuals to access the Internet in Cameroon. To achieve this objective, the methodology implemented used data from the survey of the practice of new digital media in Cameroon (PRANOME) carried out in 2021 in the cities of Yaoundé, Douala, Mfou, and Soa under the supervision of the Center of Research in Economic and Management (CEREG) from the University of Yaoundé 2-Soa in Cameroon. The influence of Internet use on the activities of individuals was analyzed using a dichotomous Logit model.
Hence, the results of the estimations carried out on the basis of this binary Logit model show that Internet use has a positive and significant effect at the $1\%$ level on the activities of listening and downloading music online, listening and downloading movies online, searching for information online and on digital social media. This Internet use also has a positive and significant effect at the $5\%$ level on online academic activities, and a positive and significant effect at the $10\%$ level on activities related to online administrative services, purchasing and online sales (e-business), and online sports activities. So the activities that motivate individuals to use the Internet in Cameroon are among others listening and downloading music online, watch and download movies online, search online information, digital social media, online academic activities, online administrative services, online purchases and sales.
Generating HTML Viewer...
References
98 Cites in Article
Koudoro Yaya Alain,Bogninou G. Sophie Reine,Bossou Annick Flore Arlette Dohoue,Agbangnan Dossa Cokou Pascal,Olaye Theophile,Bothon F. T. Diane,Alitonou Guy Alain,Avlessi Felicien,Sohounhloue Dominique (2009). METABOLITES SECONDAIRES, ACTIVITES ANTIBACTERIENNE ET ANTIRADICALAIRE DES EXTRAITS DE LECORCE DE TRONC DE ACACIA POLYACANTHA RECOLTEE AU BENIN.
Luis Aguiar,Bertin Martens (2016). Digital music consumption on the Internet: Evidence from clickstream data.
S Allegrezza,Maria Di (2003). Utilisations et utilisateurs de l'Internet au Grand-Duché de Luxemburg: à la recherche des facteurs determinants.
Jeanne Allen,Leonie Rowan,Parlo Singh (2020). Teaching and teacher education in the time of COVID-19.
C Anunobi,F Mbagwu (2009). Determinants of Internet use in Imo State, Nigeria.
K Arrow (1998). What Has Economics to Say About Racial Discrimination.
Art (2017). Base de données de l'éducation.
N Bakehe,P Fambeu,A,H Tamokwe,P,G,B (2017). Les fractures numériques diminuentelles au Cameroun?.
F Balle (2006). lecture d'information communication.
P Ballofet,C Boulaire (1999). Freins et motivations à l'utilisation d'Internet: une exploration par le biais de métaphores.
A Bandura (1997). Self Efficacy.
Victor Bekkers,V Hombung (2005). E-government and the emergence of virtual organizations in the public sector.
V Bekkers,J Edelenbos,B Steijn (2011). Innovation in the Public Sector: Linking Capacity and Leadership.
J Beuve,M Bourreau,M Péron,A Perrot (2020). Plateformes numériques et pratique anticoncurrentielles et déloyales.
A Bloomenthal (2021). Electronic Commerce" Business Leaders.
Marc Bourreau,Anne Perrot (2020). Plateformes numériques : réguler avant qu’il ne soit trop tard.
V Buskens (2002). Social Networks and Trust.
Dominique Cardon (2011). Réseaux sociaux de l'Internet.
A Chaudhuri,K Flamm (2005). An analysis of the Determinants of Broadband Acess.
Christy Cheung,Matthew Lee,Dimple Thadani (2009). The Impact of Positive Electronic Word-of-Mouth on Consumer Online Purchasing Decision.
Christy Cheung,Matthew Lee,Neil Rabjohn (2008). The impact of electronic word‐of‐mouth.
J Choudrie,Y Dwivedi (2006). Examining the Socio-Economic Determinants of Broadband Adopters and Non-Adopters in the United Kingdom.
Patrick Cohendet,Alan Kirman,Jean-Benoît Zimmermann (1998). Émergence, formation et dynamique des réseaux. Modèles de la morphogenèse.
D Crane (2014). Cultural globalization and the dominance of the American film industry: cultural policies, national film industries, and transnational film.
N Curien (2000). Economie des réseaux.
James Curry,Martin Kenney (2006). Digital divide or digital development?: The Internet in Mexico.
J Daniel (2020). Education and the COVID-19 pandemic.
A Diagne,M Al (2009). L'adoption des Technologies de l'Informations et de la Communication (TIC) par les ménages Africains au Sud du Sahara: analyse comparative à partir des micros données.
A Diddi,R Larose (2006). Getting Hooked on News: Uses and gratifications and the formation of News Habits Among College Students in an Internet Environment.
(2015). The Africa Competitiveness Report 2015.
Nicole Ellison,Danah Boyd (2013). Sociality Through Social Network Sites.
Ariel Fambeu,Novice Bakehe (2015). Interaction sociale et usages d'Internet au Cameroun.
S Feijo'o,M Foody,J O'higgins,R Pichel,A Rial (2021). Cyberbullies, the cyberbullied, and problematic Internet use: Some reasonable similarities.
A Féligonde,G Gupta (2020). L'e-gouvernance peut aider les Etats africains à relever leurs défis économiques et sociaux.
Y Froidevaux,V Taube (2006). Utilisation d'Internet dans les ménages en Suisse.
Y Frydel (2005). Ménages ayant accès à un ordinateur, à Internet et au téléphone.
M Gallegati,A Kirman (1999). Beyond the Representative Agent.
J Heckman,L Lochner,T Petra (1998). Fifty Years of Mincer Earnings.
C Hurlin (2003). Productivity Measurement with Natural Capital.
Vincent Homburg (2008). Understanding E-Government.
Ins (2017). Annuaire Statistique du Cameroun.
Ins (2014). Rapport Enquête Camerounaise sur les ménages.
M Johnson,Seungjin Whang (2002). E‐BUSINESS AND SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT: AN OVERVIEW AND FRAMEWORK.
Andreas Kaplan,Michael Haenlein (2011). Two hearts in three-quarter time: How to waltz the social media/viral marketing dance.
Andreas Kaplan,Michael Haenlein (2016). Higher education and the digital revolution: About MOOCs, SPOCs, social media, and the Cookie Monster.
Michael Katz,Carl Shapiro (1985). Product Introduction with Network Externalities.
Tobias Kretschmer,Christian Peukert (2020). Video Killed the Radio Star? Online Music Videos and Recorded Music Sales.
Chei Lee,Long Ma (2012). News sharing in social media: The effect of gratifications and prior experience.
Le Guel,F Penard,T Suire,R (2005). Adoption et usage marchand de l'Internet. Une étude économétrique sur données bretonnes.
V Lethiais,N Poussing (2004). Adoption, usage d'Internet et apprentissage: Une comparaison Bretagne/Luxembourg.
P Mallein,Y Toussaint (1994). L'intégration sociale des technologies d'Information et de communication: Une sociologie des usages.
P Manchanda,J Herbert Dube,P Yong Goh,K Chintagunta,P,K (2002). The effect of Banner Advertising on Internet Purcharsing.
J Moro-Rivera,F Garcia-Mora (2021). Internet access and poverty reduction: Evidence from rural and urban Mexico.
D Mc Fadden (1968). Regression-based specification tests for the multinomial logit model.
B Mukoko (2012). Determinants of computer and Internet Adoption and Use in a Cameroon.
Michael Naraine,Milena Parent (2017). Examining social media adoption and change to the stakeholder communication paradigm in not-for-profit sport organizations.
Thomas Niebel (2018). ICT and economic growth – Comparing developing, emerging and developed countries.
S Oukarfi (2013). L'usage d'Internet au Maroc: Essaie de mesure de la fracture numérique de second degré.
B Oyelaran-Oyeyinka,C Adaya,N (2004). Dynamics of adoption and usage of ICTs in African universities: a study of Kenya and Nigeria.
Peiyu Pai,David Arnott (2013). User adoption of social networking sites: Eliciting uses and gratifications through a means–end approach.
Thierry Penard,Nicolas Poussing,Blaise Mukoko,Georges Tamokwe Piaptie (2015). Internet adoption and usage patterns in Africa: Evidence from Cameroon.
T Pénard (2003). Economie des réseaux et service en réseaux: Une application aux stratégies concurrentielles dans l'économie numérique.
T Pénard (2012). Comparing the Determinants of Cell Phone and Internet Use in Africa: Evidence from Gabon.
T Penard,A Rallet (2014). De l'économie des Réseaux aux services en réseaux. Nouveau paradigme, nouvelles orientations.
Gabriele Piccoli,Rami Ahmad,Blake Ives (2001). Web-Based Virtual Learning Environments: A Research Framework and a Preliminary Assessment of Effectiveness in Basic it Skills Training1.
Yves Poullet,Marie-Des-Neiges Ruffo De Calabre (2021). La régulation des réseaux sociaux.
S Ram (1987). Consumer resistance to innovations: The marketing problem and its solutions S. Ram and Jadish N. Sheth, The Journal of Consumer Marketing (Spring 1989), pp. 5–14 (GPL).
J Rauch,A Casella (2001). Networks and Markets.
Andrea Rey,Eva Panetti,Roberto Maglio,Marco Ferretti (2021). Determinants in adopting the Internet of Things in the transport and logistics industry.
J Rifkin (2012). La troisième revolution industrielle: Comment le pouvoir latéral va transformer l'énergie, l'économie, et le monde.
E Rogers (1995). Diffusion of innovation.
Eva Romera,Antonio Camacho,Rosario Ortega-Ruiz,Daniel Falla (2021). Cybergossip, cyberaggression, problematic Internet use and family communication.
Bennami Routabi (2021). Déterminants d'adoption des services publics digitaux par les citoyens marocains: Cas de la plateforme "Tadamoncovid" dédiée au Covid-19.
P Sander,Bakk (2009). Determinants of Residential Internet Access in Australia.
F Satry,E Belkadi (2019). Éditorial.
Fadwa Satry,Ez-Zohra Belkadi (2020). The Adoption of Electronic Administration by Citizens: Case of Morocco.
Pierre Schweitzer (2019). L’analyse économique de l’industrie de la musique et les conséquences du numérique sur la création et le transfert de valeur.
S Singh (2001). Gender and the use of the internet at home.
D Sledgianowski,S Kulviwat (2009). Using Social Network Sites: The Effects of Playfulness, Critical Mass and Trust in a Hedonic Context.
Marco Slikker,Anne Van Den Nouweland (2001). Social and Economic Networks in Cooperative Game Theory.
Nathalie Sonnac (2013). L’écosystème des médias.
Pratompong Srinuan,Chalita Srinuan,Erik Bohlin (2014). An empirical analysis of multiple services and choices of consumer in the Swedish telecommunications market.
J Sswanyana (2007). ICT access and poverty in Uganda.
Piaptié Tamokwe,G,B (2013). Les déterminants de l'accès et des usages d'Internet en Afrique Subsaharienne: Analyse des données camerounaises et implications pour une politique de développement des TIC.
M Tengku (2005). Digital divide in Malaysia : Examining the issues of income.
Ramón Tirado-Morueta,José Aguaded-Gómez,Miguel Ortíz-Sobrino,Alejandro Rodríguez-Martín,Emilio Álvarez-Arregui (2020). Determinants of social gratifications obtained by older adults moderated by public supports for Internet access in Spain.
Ramón Tirado-Morueta,José Aguaded-Gómez,Ángel Hernando-Gómez (2018). The socio-demographic divide in Internet usage moderated by digital literacy support.
R Tirado-Morueta,A Rodriguez-Martin,E Alvarez-Arregui,A Miguel (2021). Understanding Internet appropriation among older people trough institutional support in Spain.
Ramón Tirado-Morueta,Alejandro Rodríguez-Martín,Emilio Álvarez-Arregui,Miguel Ortíz-Sobrino,José Aguaded-Gómez (2021). Determination of Internet appropriation by older people through technological support services.
Ramón Tirado-Morueta,Rosa García-Ruiz,Ángel Hernando-Gómez,Paloma Contreras-Pulido,José Aguaded-Gómez (2020). From Internet access to problematic use: multigroup analysis of push and pull factors.
A Thomas (2000). Econométrie des variables qualitatives.
D Vanhoose (2021). Critical concepts in Economics.
Fernando Vega-Redondo (2007). Complex Social Networks.
M Wimmer,A Traunmüller,R Grönlund,A Andersen,K,V (2005). Electronic Government.
C Yudes,L Rey,N Extremera (2021). The moderating effect of emotional intelligence on problematic Internet use and cyberbullying perpetration among adolescents: Gender differences.
Yong Zhao (2020). COVID-19 as a catalyst for educational change.
M Ziaul Hoq,S Kamal,E Chowdhury,H (2005). Conclusions.
Izzal Zolkepli,Yusniza Kamarulzaman (2011). Social media adoption: The role of media needs and innovation characteristics.
No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.
Data Availability
Not applicable for this article.
How to Cite This Article
Mengue Charly. 2026. \u201cInternet Use in a Central African Country: An Evidence of Cameroon\u201d. Global Journal of Human-Social Science - E: Economics GJHSS-E Volume 22 (GJHSS Volume 22 Issue E6).
Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.
Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.
Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]
Thank you for connecting with us. We will respond to you shortly.