Performance Analysis among Different Classifier Including Naive Bayes, Support Vector Machine and C4.5 for Automatic Weeds Classification

Md Mursalin
Md Mursalin
Md. Motaher Hossain
Md. Motaher Hossain
Md. Kislu Noman
Md. Kislu Noman
Md. Shafiul Azam
Md. Shafiul Azam
to Pabna University of Science and Technology

Send Message

To: Author

Performance Analysis among Different Classifier Including Naive Bayes, Support Vector Machine and C4.5 for Automatic Weeds Classification

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

CSTGVO10VT

Performance Analysis among Different Classifier Including Naive Bayes, Support Vector Machine and C4.5 for Automatic Weeds Classification Banner

AI TAKEAWAY

Connecting with the Eternal Ground
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scots Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sundanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu
Font Type
Font Size
Font Size
Bedground

Abstract

Weeds are often one of the biggest problems encountered by farmer in conventional agriculture. Maximum productivity of crops can be achieved by proper weeds management. Applying excessive herbicide uniformly throughout the field has an adverse effect on the environment. An automated weed control system which can differentiate the weeds and crops from the digital image could be a feasible solution for this problem. This paper demonstrates Naïve Bayes, SVM (Support Vector Machine) and C 4.5 classification algorithm for classifying the weeds and investigates the performance analysis among these three algorithms. In this study 400 sample images over five species were taken where each and every species contains 80 images. The result has shown that Naïve Bayes classification algorithm achieve the highest accuracy (99.3%) among these three classifier.

References

18 Cites in Article
  1. Irshad Ahmad,Abdul Naeem,Muhammad Islam,Shahid Nawaz (2007). Weed Classification using Histogram Maxima with Threshold for Selective Herbicide Applications.
  2. Faisal Ahmed,Abdullah Hawlader,A Al-Mamun,Emam Hossain,Paul Hossain,Kwan (2012). Classification of crops and weeds from digital images: A support vector machine approach.
  3. A Faisal Ahmed,Emam Hossain,Hossain,Abdullah Hawlader,Paul Al-Mamun,Kwan (2011). Performance Analysis of Support Vector Machine and Bayesian Classifier for Crop and Weed Classification from Digital Images.
  4. J Fu,J Chai,S Wong,J Deng,J Yeh (2002). De-noising of left ventricular myocardial borders in magnetic resonance images.
  5. C Rafael,Richard González,Woods (2004). Digital Image Processing.
  6. (2012). International Survey of Herbicide-Resistant Weeds: WSSA Herbicide-Resistant Weeds Committee.
  7. Jiang Zhengrong,Li Zhengxi (2011). Automatic Weed Identification Based on Image Processing Technology.
  8. Otsu (1979). A Threshold Selection Method from Gray-Level Histograms.
  9. S Shearer,P Jones (1991). Selective Application of Post-Emergence Herbicides Using Photoelectric.
  10. H Sogaard (2005). Weed Classification by Active Shape Models.
  11. M Weis,T Rumpf,R Gerhards,L Plumer (2009). Comparison of different classification algorithms for weed detection from images based on shape parameters.
  12. M Weisa,R Gerhards (2007). Feature extraction for the identification of weed species in digital images for the purpose of site-specific weed control.
  13. M Weis,C Gutjahr,V Rueda,R Gerhards,C Ritter,F Scholderle (2010). Precision Crop Protection -the Challenge and Use of Heterogeneity.
  14. Yoshimasa Tsuruoka,Jun'ichi Tsujii (2003). Training a naive bayes classifier via the EM algorithm with a class distribution constraint.
  15. Anupama Kumar,Vijayalakshmi (2011). Implication Of Classification Techniques In Predicting Student’s Recital.
  16. Neelabh Sonal Athavale,Sao (2012). Classification on Moving Object Trajectories.
  17. J Quinlan (1993). Programs for Machine Learning.
  18. (2012). LIBSVM-A Library for Support Vector Machines.

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Md Mursalin. 1970. \u201cPerformance Analysis among Different Classifier Including Naive Bayes, Support Vector Machine and C4.5 for Automatic Weeds Classification\u201d. Global Journal of Computer Science and Technology - F: Graphics & Vision GJCST-F Volume 13 (GJCST Volume 13 Issue F3).

Download Citation

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/gjcst

Print ISSN 0975-4350

e-ISSN 0975-4172

Version of record

v1.2

Language
en
Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

Article Matrices
Total Views: 25957
Total Downloads: 11369
2026 Trends
Related Research
Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

Quote and Order Details

Contact Person

Invoice Address

Notes or Comments

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

Performance Analysis among Different Classifier Including Naive Bayes, Support Vector Machine and C4.5 for Automatic Weeds Classification

Md Mursalin
Md Mursalin <p>Pabna University of Science and Technology</p>
Md. Motaher Hossain
Md. Motaher Hossain
Md. Kislu Noman
Md. Kislu Noman <p>Pabna University of Science and Technology</p>
Md. Shafiul Azam
Md. Shafiul Azam

Research Journals