Behavior of I-Section GFRP Beam Including Retrofitting for Damage Effects

α
Mamadou Konate
Mamadou Konate
σ
Zia Razzaq
Zia Razzaq
α Old Dominion University Old Dominion University

Send Message

To: Author

Behavior of I-Section GFRP Beam Including Retrofitting for Damage Effects

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

Q2577

Behavior of I-Section GFRP Beam Including Retrofitting for Damage Effects Banner

AI TAKEAWAY

Connecting with the Eternal Ground
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scots Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sundanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu

Abstract

This paper presents the outcome of a study of an I-section Glass Fiber Reinforced Polymer (GFRP) beam including retrofitting for damage effects. A total of three beam tests were conducted in the following sequence: GFRP beam with no retrofitting and a single mid-span web brace; the partially damaged (cracked) beam with GFRP plates used for retrofitting; and the retrofitted beam re-tested with the lateral brace at the top flange level. Both cracking and lateraltorsional buckling behavior is studied and experimental load-deflection relationships recorded. Using the mechanical properties of GFRP based on the experimental data, theoretical predictions are made for the buckling load values. The results show that retrofitted damaged beam provided about half of the original strength of the undamaged beam. The study also shows that the mid-span brace played a significant role in beam behavior and strength.

References

14 Cites in Article
  1. S Hamid,M Ehsani (1991). RC Beams Strengthened with GFRP Plates.
  2. U Meier,M Deuring (1992). Shear Strengthening of Beams on the Sunshine Skyway Bridge Trestle Spans with CFRP.
  3. Zia Razzaq,Ram Prabhakaran,Mike Sirjani (1996). Load and resistance factor design (LRFD) approach for reinforced-plastic channel beam buckling.
  4. M Phalguni,S Narayan,Cyril,L (1998). Optimizing Structural Response of Beams Strengthened with GFRP Plates.
  5. J Teng,L Lam,W Chan,J Wang (2000). Retrofitting of Deficient RC Cantilever Slabs Using GFRP Strips.
  6. N Loudon (2001). Strengthening Highway Structures with Fiber Reinforced Composites.
  7. A Borri,M Corradi (2002). New Materials for Strengthening and Seismic Upgrading Interventions.
  8. (2004). All-round pultrusion expertise at Pultrex.
  9. Z Razzaq,M Sirjani (2005). Stability of FRP Beams under Three-point Loading and LRFD Approach.
  10. U Meier,I Stöcklin (2005). External strengthening of continuous beams with CFRP.
  11. P Raju,D Tharun,C Bala (2011). Experimental Evaluation of Retrofitted Concrete Beams using CFRP and GFRP.
  12. Jeffrey Western (2011). Guidelines for structural bolting in accordance with the AISC (American Institute of Steel Construction) ninth edition Manual of Steel Construction''.
  13. Gene,J Goodno,B (2012). Charles Thomson to 1st Federal Congress of the United States [United States Congress], c. April 1789 [congfiJH0150418a1c].
  14. D Shinde,Yojana Pudale,Veena Nair (2014). Flexural Behaviour of Reinforced Cement Concrete Beam Wrapped with GFRP Sheet.

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Mamadou Konate. 2014. \u201cBehavior of I-Section GFRP Beam Including Retrofitting for Damage Effects\u201d. Global Journal of Research in Engineering - E: Civil & Structural GJRE-E Volume 14 (GJRE Volume 14 Issue E6): .

Download Citation

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/gjre

Print ISSN 0975-5861

e-ISSN 2249-4596

Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

December 8, 2014

Language
en
Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

Article Matrices
Total Views: 4266
Total Downloads: 2172
2026 Trends
Related Research

Published Article

This paper presents the outcome of a study of an I-section Glass Fiber Reinforced Polymer (GFRP) beam including retrofitting for damage effects. A total of three beam tests were conducted in the following sequence: GFRP beam with no retrofitting and a single mid-span web brace; the partially damaged (cracked) beam with GFRP plates used for retrofitting; and the retrofitted beam re-tested with the lateral brace at the top flange level. Both cracking and lateraltorsional buckling behavior is studied and experimental load-deflection relationships recorded. Using the mechanical properties of GFRP based on the experimental data, theoretical predictions are made for the buckling load values. The results show that retrofitted damaged beam provided about half of the original strength of the undamaged beam. The study also shows that the mid-span brace played a significant role in beam behavior and strength.

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

Quote and Order Details

Contact Person

Invoice Address

Notes or Comments

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

Behavior of I-Section GFRP Beam Including Retrofitting for Damage Effects

Mamadou Konate
Mamadou Konate Old Dominion University
Zia Razzaq
Zia Razzaq

Research Journals