Display of Counter Productive Work Behaviour in Relation to Person-Organization Fit

Dr Anita Sharma

Display of Counter Productive Work Behaviour in Relation to Person-Organization Fit

yajvinder * §

Contact

§ Himachal Pradesh University

Display of Counter Productive Work Behaviour in Relation to Person-Organization Fit

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

99WH5

Display of Counter Productive Work Behaviour in Relation to Person-Organization Fit Banner

Key Research Insights

Synthesized scholarly intelligence & interactive research assistant

This converted HTML version may contain rendering inconsistencies. Please refer to the PDF for the authoritative version, or click here to provide feedback.

Abstract

The present study was aimed to investigate the relationship between counterproductive work behaviour (CWB) and person-organization fit (P-O Fit) within the context of manufacturing industry situated in Baddi, Himachal Pradesh. The sample comprised 300 employees of production department (150 male and 150 female respondents). The analysis revealed that for the total sample, Interpersonal Similarities (12%) and unique roles (4%) have contributed 16% of variance in totality for Organizational-Counterproductive Work Behaviour and for Interpersonal-Counterproductive Work Behaviour, Unique Roles (4%) and Value Congruence (2%) contributed for 6% variance in totality. In Males sample, Unique Roles explained maximum variance (12%) followed by Need Supplies (5%) and Interpersonal Similarities (3%) for Organizational-Counterproductive Work Behaviour. For Interpersonal-CWB only Unique Roles have turned out to be a significant predictor which accounted for 5% of variance. In Females sample, Interpersonal Similarities explained maximum variance (16%) followed by Demand Abilities (4%) in total these predictors accounted for 20% variance for Organizational-Counterproductive Work Behaviour.

References

24 Cites in Article

Reference Format

1. S Applebaum,B Shapiro,J Molson (2007). Diagnosis and remedies for deviant workplace behaviors. The Journal of American Academy of Business, 9(2), 14-20.
2. S Aryee,P Budhwar,Z Chen (2002). Trust as a mediator of the relationship between organizational justice and work outcomes: Test of a Social Exchange Model. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23(3), 267-285.
3. K Aquino,B Galperin,R Bennett (2004). Social status and aggressiveness as moderator of the relationship between interactional justice and work place deviance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 34(5), 1001-1029.
4. Rebecca Bennett,Sandra Robinson (2000). Development of a measure of workplace deviance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(3), 349-360.
5. P Blau (1964). Exchange and power in social life. Exchange and power in social life
6. Geoffrey Borman,N Dowling (2008). Teacher Attrition and Retention: A Meta-Analytic and Narrative Review of the Research. Review of Educational Research, 78(3), 367-409.
7. D Cable,T Judge (1994). Personorganization fit and theory of work adjustment: Implications for satisfaction, tenure, and career success. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 44, 32-54.
8. Daniel Cable,Timothy Judge (1996). Person–Organization Fit, Job Choice Decisions, and Organizational Entry. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67(3), 294-311.
9. Daniel Cable,Timothy Judge (1997). Interviewers' perceptions of person-organization fit and organizational selection decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(4), 546-561.
10. Daniel Cable,Jeffrey Edwards (2004). Complementary and Supplementary Fit: A Theoretical and Empirical Integration. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(5), 822-834.
11. D Caldwell,C O'reilly,Iii (1990). Measuring person-job fit with a profile-comparison process. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(6), 648-657.
12. B Christopher,J Leonard,M Steven (2012). The general environment fit scale: A factor analysis and test of convergent construct validity. The general environment fit scale: A factor analysis and test of convergent construct validity
13. C Henle (2005). Predicting workplace CWB from the interaction between organizational justice and personality. Journal of Managerial Issues, 17(2), 247-263.
14. Abid Hussain,Muhammad Rizwan-Ul-Haq,Hassan Al-Ayedh,Ahmed Al-Jabr (2014). Mycoinsecticides: Potential and Future Perspective. Recent Patents on Food, Nutrition & Agriculture, 6(1), 45-53.
15. J Hoffman,J Woehr (2006). A quantitative review of the relationship between personorganization Fit and behavioral outcomes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68, 389-399.
16. A Kristof-Brown,R Zimmerman,E Johnson (2005). Consequences of individuals' fit at work: A meta-analysis of person-job, personorganization, person-group, and person-supervisor fit. Personnel Psychology, 58, 281-342.
17. Amy Kristof (1996). PERSON‐ORGANIZATION FIT: AN INTEGRATIVE REVIEW OF ITS CONCEPTUALIZATIONS, MEASUREMENT, AND IMPLICATIONS. Personnel Psychology, 49(1), 1-49.
18. A Kristof-Brown (2000). PERCEIVED APPLICANT FIT: DISTINGUISHING BETWEEN RECRUITERS' PERCEPTIONS OF PERSON‐JOB AND PERSON‐ORGANIZATION FIT. Personnel Psychology, 53(3), 643-671.
19. Bangcheng Liu,Jianxin Liu,Jin Hu (2010). Person-Organization Fit, Job Satisfaction, and Turnover Intention: An Empirical Study in the Chinese Public Sector. Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal, 38(5), 615-625.
20. Mahmut Demir,Sirvan,Sen Demir,Kevin Nield (2015). The relationship between person-organization fit, organizational identification and work outcomes. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 16(2), 369-386.
21. C O'reilly,J Chatman,D Caldwell (1991). People and organizational culture: A profile comparison approach to assessing person-organization fit. Academy of Management Journal, 34, 487-516.
22. C O'reilly,J Chatman (1986). Organizational commitment and psychological attachment: The effects of compliance, identification, and internalization on prosocial behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 492-499.
23. Lisa Penney,Paul Spector (2002). Narcissism and Counterproductive Work Behavior: Do Bigger Egos Mean Bigger Problems?. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 10(1-2), 126-134.
24. S,Jailap Deen,Ashok Bosley (2015). The effect of congruence between perceived personal and organizational values on organizational commitment. The effect of congruence between perceived personal and organizational values on organizational commitment

Download References

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Dr Anita Sharma. 2016. "Display of Counter Productive Work Behaviour in Relation to Person-Organization Fit". Global Journal of Human-Social Science - A: Arts & Humanities GJHSS-A Volume 16 (GJHSS Volume 16 Issue A1).

More Citation Formats

Select Citation Style:

Download Citation

GJHSS Volume 16 Issue A1

Explore Journals Explore Volume Read This Issue

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJHSS

Print ISSN 0975-587X

e-ISSN 2249-460X

Keywords

Not Found

Classification

GJHSS-A Classification FOR Code: 170199

Submission ReceivedDecember 9, 2015
Peer Review Double Blind
Handling Editor
Accepted January 4, 2016
Published January 15, 2016

Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

February 6, 2016

Language

English

Order Article Reprint

Experience in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

View in VR

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

View in 3D

Article Matrices

Total Score: 102

Country: Unknown

Subject: Global Journal of Human-Social Science - A: Arts & Humanities

Authors: Dr Anita Sharma, Kalpna Thakur (PhD/Dr. count: 0)

View Count (all-time): 272

Total Views (Real + Logic): 1207

Total Downloads (simulated): 61

Publish Date: 2016 01, Fri

Monthly Totals (Real + Logic):

Month 1: 63 views
Month 2: 56 views
Month 3: 42 views
Month 4: 33 views
Month 5: 24 views
Month 6: 31 views
Month 7: 23 views
Month 8: 32 views
Month 9: 16 views
Month 10: 44 views
Month 11: 37 views
Month 12: 32 views
Month 13: 34 views
Month 14: 30 views
Month 15: 25 views
Month 16: 24 views
Month 17: 16 views
Month 18: 27 views
Month 19: 22 views
Month 20: 15 views
Month 21: 28 views
Month 22: 43 views
Month 23: 24 views
Month 24: 46 views
Month 25: 40 views
Month 26: 23 views
Month 27: 21 views
Month 28: 38 views
Month 29: 32 views
Month 30: 22 views
Month 31: 26 views
Month 32: 45 views
Month 33: 46 views
Month 34: 17 views
Month 35: 18 views
Month 36: 35 views
Month 37: 24 views
Month 38: 29 views
Month 39: 27 views
Month 40: 25 views
Month 41: 18 views
Month 42: 18 views
Month 43: 41 views
Month 44: 20 views
Month 45: 34 views
Month 46: 24 views
Month 47: 32 views
Month 48: 17 views
Month 49: 32 views
Month 50: 41 views
Month 51: 18 views
Month 52: 20 views
Month 53: 14 views
Month 54: 34 views
Month 55: 25 views
Month 56: 16 views
Month 57: 36 views
Month 58: 38 views
Month 59: 25 views
Month 60: 25 views
Month 61: 20 views
Month 62: 19 views
Month 63: 24 views
Month 64: 18 views
Month 65: 31 views
Month 66: 11 views
Month 67: 42 views
Month 68: 18 views
Month 69: 39 views
Month 70: 25 views
Month 71: 26 views
Month 72: 35 views
Month 73: 34 views
Month 74: 26 views
Month 75: 40 views
Month 76: 12 views
Month 77: 25 views
Month 78: 44 views
Month 79: 36 views
Month 80: 14 views
Month 81: 39 views
Month 82: 36 views
Month 83: 23 views
Month 84: 30 views
Month 85: 21 views
Month 86: 41 views
Month 87: 44 views
Month 88: 28 views
Month 89: 42 views
Month 90: 32 views
Month 91: 28 views
Month 92: 28 views
Month 93: 48 views
Month 94: 31 views
Month 95: 31 views
Month 96: 34 views
Month 97: 39 views
Month 98: 29 views
Month 99: 31 views
Month 100: 21 views
Month 101: 16 views
Month 102: 29 views
Month 103: 23 views
Month 104: 34 views
Month 105: 42 views
Month 106: 31 views
Month 107: 17 views
Month 108: 41 views
Month 109: 26 views
Month 110: 23 views
Month 111: 36 views
Month 112: 42 views
Month 113: 18 views
Month 114: 36 views
Month 115: 21 views
Month 116: 40 views
Month 117: 76 views
Month 118: 78 views
Month 119: 44 views
Month 120: 82 views
Month 121: 56 views
Month 122: 25 views
Month 123: 43 views
Month 124: 35 views
Month 125: 28 views
Month 126: 35 views
Month 127: 45 views
Month 128: 40 views
Month 129: 73 views
Month 130: 39 views

Total Views: 1.2K

Total Downloads: 61

All Trends