Effect of Cherenkov Radiation on Superluminal Free Spin-half Particles Motion in Spacetime

α
Emmanuel D.K. Gazoya
Emmanuel D.K. Gazoya
α National Nuclear Research Institute

Send Message

To: Author

Effect of Cherenkov Radiation on Superluminal Free Spin-half Particles Motion in Spacetime

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

34SI3

Effect of Cherenkov Radiation on Superluminal Free Spin-half Particles Motion in Spacetime Banner

AI TAKEAWAY

Connecting with the Eternal Ground
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scots Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sundanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu

Abstract

Conservation laws, consisting of the existence of quantities which do not change in time, independent of the dynamical evolution of a system, are crucial and vital for the construction of any dynamical system theory. The basic properties such as conservation of energy, momentum, angular momentum, charge, isospin, or generalization thereof are fundamental and must be guaranteed by a physical system, if it is to give a valid description of nature. One persistent objection against the concept of superluminal entities is based on the anticipation of fast energy loss which could be incurred under Vavilov-Cherenkov radiation, with the consequent prediction that no such particles could be detected. Yet presently, no theoretical or experimental explication exists which justifies this claim. Here we show, in the limit of a kinematically permissible and non-dispersive medium, that energy conservation is feasible. Corresponding to radiation intensities from large energy-momentum transfer, when the parameter 𝑘𝑘 of the generalized linear velocity of the superluminal free spin-half field is made sufficiently large, Cherenkov cone becomes flattened at 90 𝑜𝑜 with direction of motion, bringing the radiated energy to merge with the circulating energy flow in the wave field of the particle.

References

37 Cites in Article
  1. G Afanasiev,V Kartavenko,E Magar (1999). Valvilov-Cherenkov radiation in dispersive medium.
  2. G Afanasiev,S Eliseev,Yu Stepanovsky (1999). Semi-Analytic Treatment of the Vavilov-Cherenkov Radiation.
  3. G Afanasiev (2004). Vavilov-Cherenkov and Synchrotron Radiation.
  4. Alaeian (2014). An Introduction to β-Ray Spectroscopy.
  5. F Belinfante (1939). On the spin angular momentum of mesons.
  6. Rudolf Bock,Angela Vasilescu (1998). The Particle Detector BriefBook.
  7. P Cherenkov (1934). Visible radiation induced by g rays in pure fluids.
  8. P Cherenkov (1944). Radiation of electrons moving with the velocity exceeding that of light.
  9. Effect of Cherenkov Radiation on Superluminal Free Spin-half Particles Motion in Spacetime.
  10. P Clemmow,J Dougherty (1969). Electrodynamics of Particles and Plasmas.
  11. Paul Dirac (1928). The quantum theory of the Electron. Part II.
  12. J Dunlop,J Peacock (1990). The redshift cut-off in the luminosity function of radio galaxies and quasars.
  13. J Dunlop,J Peacock,H Spinrad (1996). A 3.5-Gyr-old galaxy at redshift 1.55.
  14. A Einstein (1905). Uber einen die Erzeugung und Verwandlung des Lichtesbet reffendenheuristischen Gesichtspunkt.
  15. Albert Einstein (1936). Lens-Like Action of a Star by the Deviation of Light in the Gravitational Field.
  16. R Feynman,R Leighton,M Sands (1965). Feynman Lectures on Physics.
  17. R Feynman (1972). Statistical mechanics: A set of lectures.
  18. I Frank,I Tamm (1937). Coherent Visible Radiation of Fast Electrons Passing Through Matter.
  19. E Gazoya,F Oduro,E Prempeh (2015). Investigation of superluminal motion of free spin-half particles in spacetime.
  20. G Afanasiev,V Kartavenko,V Zrelov (2003). Fine structure of the Vavilov-Cherenkov radiation.
  21. Emmanuel Gazoya,Francis Oduro,Edward Prempeh (2016). Superluminal Motion of Free Spin-half Particles in a Fiber Bundle Formalism.
  22. V Ginzburg (1940). Quantum theory of the light radiation from the electron moving uniformly inmedium.
  23. W Gordon (1928). Unknown Title.
  24. W Greiner (2000). Relativistic quantum mechanics-wave equations.
  25. J Jackson (1999). Classical Electrodynamics.
  26. J Jelle (1955). Cerenkov radiation and Its applications.
  27. M Katharina (2014). Cherenkov radiation.
  28. K Konrad (1998). Detectors for particle radiation.
  29. C Leroy,P Rancoita (2014). Principles of radiation interaction in matter and detection.
  30. M Longair (1978). Radio astronomy and cosmology, in Observational Cosmology: 8th advanced course.
  31. M Longair (1981). High Energy Astrophysics.
  32. M Longair (1995). Galaxy Formation and the Background Radiation.
  33. M Longair (1997). Effect of Cherenkov Radiation on Superluminal Free Spin-half Particles Motion.
  34. M Longair (1997). High Energy Astrophysics.
  35. H Ohanian (1984). What Is Spin?.
  36. S Vavilov (1934). On the possible reasons for the blue g luminescence of fluids.
  37. J Wahlstrand,R Merlin (2003). Cherenkov radiation emitted by ultra-fast laser pulses and the generation of coherent polaritons.

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Emmanuel D.K. Gazoya. 2016. \u201cEffect of Cherenkov Radiation on Superluminal Free Spin-half Particles Motion in Spacetime\u201d. Global Journal of Science Frontier Research - F: Mathematics & Decision GJSFR-F Volume 16 (GJSFR Volume 16 Issue F5): .

Download Citation

Issue Cover
GJSFR Volume 16 Issue F5
Pg. 35- 48
Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJSFR

Print ISSN 0975-5896

e-ISSN 2249-4626

Keywords
Classification
GJSFR-F Classification: MSC 2010: 35Q85
Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

September 16, 2016

Language
en
Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

Article Matrices
Total Views: 3776
Total Downloads: 1958
2026 Trends
Related Research

Published Article

Conservation laws, consisting of the existence of quantities which do not change in time, independent of the dynamical evolution of a system, are crucial and vital for the construction of any dynamical system theory. The basic properties such as conservation of energy, momentum, angular momentum, charge, isospin, or generalization thereof are fundamental and must be guaranteed by a physical system, if it is to give a valid description of nature. One persistent objection against the concept of superluminal entities is based on the anticipation of fast energy loss which could be incurred under Vavilov-Cherenkov radiation, with the consequent prediction that no such particles could be detected. Yet presently, no theoretical or experimental explication exists which justifies this claim. Here we show, in the limit of a kinematically permissible and non-dispersive medium, that energy conservation is feasible. Corresponding to radiation intensities from large energy-momentum transfer, when the parameter 𝑘𝑘 of the generalized linear velocity of the superluminal free spin-half field is made sufficiently large, Cherenkov cone becomes flattened at 90 𝑜𝑜 with direction of motion, bringing the radiated energy to merge with the circulating energy flow in the wave field of the particle.

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

Quote and Order Details

Contact Person

Invoice Address

Notes or Comments

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

Effect of Cherenkov Radiation on Superluminal Free Spin-half Particles Motion in Spacetime

Emmanuel D.K. Gazoya
Emmanuel D.K. Gazoya National Nuclear Research Institute

Research Journals