Extension of the Consecutive Modal Pushover Analysis (CMP) to Asymmetric Concrete Moment Resistance Frame Buildings

Extension of the Consecutive Modal Pushover Analysis (CMP) to Asymmetric Concrete Moment Resistance Frame Buildings

Babak H. Mamaqani

Contact

The University of Texas at Arlington

Extension of the Consecutive Modal Pushover Analysis (CMP) to Asymmetric Concrete Moment Resistance Frame Buildings

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

WFB7Y

Extension of the Consecutive Modal Pushover Analysis (CMP) to Asymmetric Concrete Moment Resistance Frame Buildings Banner

AI TAKEAWAY

Connecting with the Eternal Ground

Abstract

The Nonlinear Static Procedure (Nsp) Based On Pushover Analysis Is Usually Restricted With A Single Mode Response. The Nsp Is Valid Mainly For Low-Rise Buildings Where The Behavior Is Dominated By Fundamental Vibration Modes. It Is Of Significance To Take Into Account Of Higher Mode Effects In Pushover Analysis Of Such Structures As Tall Buildings Or Asymmetric Structures. Consecutive Modal Pushover (Cmp) Procedure Is Recently Proposed To Consider Higher Mode Effects In 2d Models. This Paper Deals With The Extension Of The Cmp Method To Asymmetric Building Structures. The Asymmetric Models Of This Study Are Reinforced Concrete Moment Resisting Frame Buildings. The Results Are Compared With Results Of Nonlinear Dynamic Time-History Analyses. Promising Compatibility Is Found In Both Local And Global Responses.

References

11 Cites in Article

Reference Format

Craig Comartin,Richard Niewiarowski,Sigmund Freeman,Fred Turner (1996). Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Concrete Buildings: A Practical Overview of the <i>ATC 40</i> Document.
A Ayala,E Tavera (2002). A new approach for the evaluation of the seismic performance of asymmetric buildings.
M Aydinoglu (2003). An incremental response spectrum analysis procedure based on inelastic spectral displacements for multi-mode seismic performance evaluation.
Anil Chopra,Rakesh Goel (2004). A modal pushover analysis procedure to estimate seismic demands for unsymmetric‐plan buildings.
(2000). Prestandard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings.
Fajfar (2002). A Nonlinear Analysis Method for Performance Based Seismic Design.
K Fujii,Y Nakano,Y Sanada (2004). Simplified nonlinear analysis procedure for asymmetric buildings.
A Moghadam (2002). A pushover procedure for tall buildings.
Mehdi Poursha,Faramarz Khoshnoudian,A Moghadam (2009). A consecutive modal pushover procedure for estimating the seismic demands of tall buildings.
Q Yu,R Pugliesi,M Allen,C Bischoff (1104). Assessment of modal pushover analysis procedure and its application to seismic evaluation of existing building.
A Zárate,A Ayala (2004). Validation of single storey models for the evaluation of seismic performance of multi-storey asymmetric buildings.

Download References

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Babak H. Mamaqani. 2014. \u201cExtension of the Consecutive Modal Pushover Analysis (CMP) to Asymmetric Concrete Moment Resistance Frame Buildings\u201d. Global Journal of Research in Engineering - E: Civil & Structural GJRE-E Volume 14 (GJRE Volume 14 Issue E4): .

More Citation Formats

Select Citation Style:

Download Citation

Download Article

GJRE Volume 14 Issue E4
Pg. 1- 5

Explore Journals Explore Volume Read This Issue

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/gjre

Print ISSN 0975-5861

e-ISSN 2249-4596

Keywords

consecutive modal pushover (cmp)higher mode effects pushover analysis tall buildings

Submission ReceivedDecember 13, 2013
Peer Review Double Blind
Handling Editor
Accepted December 31, 2013
Published January 15, 2014

Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

September 25, 2014

Language

Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

View in VR

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

View in 3D

Article Matrices

Total Score: 131

Country: United States

Subject: Global Journal of Research in Engineering - E: Civil & Structural

Authors: Babak H. Mamaqani (PhD/Dr. count: 0)

View Count (all-time): 178

Total Views (Real + Logic): 4516

Total Downloads (simulated): 2252

Publish Date: 2014 09, Thu

Monthly Totals (Real + Logic):

Month 1: 37 views
Month 2: 36 views
Month 3: 49 views
Month 4: 35 views
Month 5: 60 views
Month 6: 23 views
Month 7: 46 views
Month 8: 25 views
Month 9: 29 views
Month 10: 20 views
Month 11: 23 views
Month 12: 19 views
Month 13: 25 views
Month 14: 36 views
Month 15: 19 views
Month 16: 40 views
Month 17: 45 views
Month 18: 48 views
Month 19: 36 views
Month 20: 21 views
Month 21: 23 views
Month 22: 25 views
Month 23: 17 views
Month 24: 24 views
Month 25: 36 views
Month 26: 32 views
Month 27: 27 views
Month 28: 39 views
Month 29: 26 views
Month 30: 40 views
Month 31: 40 views
Month 32: 42 views
Month 33: 40 views
Month 34: 12 views
Month 35: 34 views
Month 36: 33 views
Month 37: 30 views
Month 38: 24 views
Month 39: 33 views
Month 40: 27 views
Month 41: 26 views
Month 42: 39 views
Month 43: 30 views
Month 44: 23 views
Month 45: 42 views
Month 46: 28 views
Month 47: 34 views
Month 48: 33 views
Month 49: 21 views
Month 50: 29 views
Month 51: 26 views
Month 52: 18 views
Month 53: 36 views
Month 54: 33 views
Month 55: 39 views
Month 56: 27 views
Month 57: 16 views
Month 58: 16 views
Month 59: 40 views
Month 60: 19 views
Month 61: 26 views
Month 62: 21 views
Month 63: 36 views
Month 64: 22 views
Month 65: 21 views
Month 66: 19 views
Month 67: 33 views
Month 68: 20 views
Month 69: 50 views
Month 70: 26 views
Month 71: 35 views
Month 72: 25 views
Month 73: 40 views
Month 74: 41 views
Month 75: 36 views
Month 76: 34 views
Month 77: 36 views
Month 78: 19 views
Month 79: 27 views
Month 80: 33 views
Month 81: 42 views
Month 82: 27 views
Month 83: 28 views
Month 84: 26 views
Month 85: 34 views
Month 86: 19 views
Month 87: 28 views
Month 88: 18 views
Month 89: 39 views
Month 90: 38 views
Month 91: 43 views
Month 92: 26 views
Month 93: 50 views
Month 94: 31 views
Month 95: 21 views
Month 96: 24 views
Month 97: 39 views
Month 98: 40 views
Month 99: 12 views
Month 100: 17 views
Month 101: 39 views
Month 102: 38 views
Month 103: 36 views
Month 104: 37 views
Month 105: 21 views
Month 106: 33 views
Month 107: 40 views
Month 108: 27 views
Month 109: 35 views
Month 110: 22 views
Month 111: 25 views
Month 112: 39 views
Month 113: 45 views
Month 114: 25 views
Month 115: 28 views
Month 116: 16 views
Month 117: 32 views
Month 118: 15 views
Month 119: 38 views
Month 120: 42 views
Month 121: 32 views
Month 122: 32 views
Month 123: 37 views
Month 124: 33 views
Month 125: 32 views
Month 126: 20 views
Month 127: 33 views
Month 128: 32 views
Month 129: 31 views
Month 130: 33 views
Month 131: 21 views
Month 132: 32 views
Month 133: 35 views
Month 134: 19 views
Month 135: 42 views
Month 136: 47 views
Month 137: 31 views
Month 138: 50 views
Month 139: 46 views
Month 140: 37 views

Total Views: 4516

Total Downloads: 2252

2026 Trends

Published Article

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]