Great Powersa Conflict Management and Resolution in South-East Asia: An Evaluation of North-Korean Denuclearization Process and Six Party Talks

α
Sheriff Ghali Ibrahim
Sheriff Ghali Ibrahim
σ
Yusuf Ali Zoaka
Yusuf Ali Zoaka
ρ
Bibi Farouq
Bibi Farouq
α University of Abuja University of Abuja

Send Message

To: Author

Great Powersa Conflict Management and Resolution in South-East Asia: An Evaluation of North-Korean Denuclearization Process and Six Party Talks

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

3DWJ8

Great Powersa Conflict Management and Resolution in South-East Asia: An Evaluation of North-Korean Denuclearization Process and Six Party Talks Banner

AI TAKEAWAY

Connecting with the Eternal Ground
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scots Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sundanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu

Abstract

With the lessons of 1950’s war on the Korean peninsular, drawing from the initial soviet reluctance to back North Korea against the US forces and the subsequent lessons of global realism and constructivism learnt by the north in US perpetual support of the south, the latter resorted to building a nuclear armament for its continuity and survival. This paper is an evaluation of the efficacy of six party talks as adopted in conflict management and resolution in south-east Asia. The paper adopts a descriptive secondary research from existing documented literatures for conclusive analogy. The paper discovers that, the six party talks is a diplomatic way of engaging the provoked north to halt its nuclear ambition, for failure to denuclearize north Korea may serve as a great threat to US ally (south Korea) in the region. The paper concludes that, there is western nuclear strategy to dominate the global military industrial complex and warfare around the world-hence the perpetual subjugation of the global armament and the strategic deterrence of non proliferation. The paper recommends mutual understanding, respect to the sovereignty of states and balance of power among other things.

References

27 Cites in Article
  1. (null). Economic Sanctions Against a Nuclear North Korea: An Analysis of United States and United Nations Actions Since 1950.
  2. President Truman declares a state of national emergency in U.S. because of Korean War.
  3. U (1965). issues first International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR) which includes North Korea on list of countries that should be denied, "licenses, approvals, Exports and imports of defense articles and defense services.
  4. U sanctions various North Korean entities for violation of U.S. missile nonproliferation laws found in sections of the Arms Export Control Act, Export Administration Act, and Iran Nonproliferation Act of 2000.
  5. Samuel Bacharach,Edward Lawler (1981). Power and Tactics in Bargaining.
  6. J Bush (2002). axis of evil.
  7. Cmfa (2003). Six-Point Consensus Reached at Six Party Talks.
  8. A Dong (2002). Light Water Reactor Project.
  9. Y Eric (2004). The six-party talks and the North Korean nuclear dispute Resolution under the IAEA safeguards regime.
  10. J Gittings,O Burkeman (2002). Bush Seeks to Turn Screw on N. Korea: Tailored Containment Policy.
  11. C Hun-Joo,Jeong-H (2002). Cadman, Mark Robert, (born 30 Dec. 1963), Executive Vice President and Managing Director, BBDO North America, since 2013.
  12. Jmfa (2002). North Korea: Beyond the Six-Party Talks.
  13. L Karin,C Julia (1955). North Korea: Economic Sanctions And U.
  14. Henry Kissinger,Gordon Dean (1969). Nuclear Weapons and Foreign Policy.
  15. W Norton Unknown Title.
  16. D Lax,J Sebenius (1986). The Manager as Negotiator.
  17. R Lewicki,B Barry,D Saunders,M John (2003). Negotiation.
  18. H Nicholson (1964). Diplomacy.
  19. H Raiffa (1982). The Art and Science of Negotiations.
  20. S Selig (2004). Ending the North Korean Nuclear Crisis.
  21. M Soo (2003). Agendas for change: 1787–1790.
  22. A Tanya,C Azeta (2010). International Negotiation: a Journal of Theory and Practice.
  23. S Yong,S Dong-Ki (2002). NK Resumes 19. Operation of Nuclear Facilities.
  24. H Yoo-Sung,K Young-Sik (2003). Differences between US and NK Lower Expectations for Beijing Nuke Talks, DONG-A ILBO DAILY.
  25. W Zartman (1976). The 50% Solution: How to Bargain Successfully with Hijackers, Strikers, Bosses, Oil Magnates, Arabs, Russians, and Other Worthy Opponents in this Modern World.
  26. W Zartman (1978). The Negotiation Process: Theories and Applications.
  27. W Zartman (1988). Common Elements in the Analysis of the Negotiation Process.

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Sheriff Ghali Ibrahim. 2013. \u201cGreat Powersa Conflict Management and Resolution in South-East Asia: An Evaluation of North-Korean Denuclearization Process and Six Party Talks\u201d. Global Journal of Human-Social Science - F: Political Science GJHSS-F Volume 13 (GJHSS Volume 13 Issue F5): .

Download Citation

Issue Cover
GJHSS Volume 13 Issue F5
Pg. 77- 85
Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJHSS

Print ISSN 0975-587X

e-ISSN 2249-460X

Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

September 18, 2013

Language
en
Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

Article Matrices
Total Views: 4867
Total Downloads: 2400
2026 Trends
Related Research

Published Article

With the lessons of 1950’s war on the Korean peninsular, drawing from the initial soviet reluctance to back North Korea against the US forces and the subsequent lessons of global realism and constructivism learnt by the north in US perpetual support of the south, the latter resorted to building a nuclear armament for its continuity and survival. This paper is an evaluation of the efficacy of six party talks as adopted in conflict management and resolution in south-east Asia. The paper adopts a descriptive secondary research from existing documented literatures for conclusive analogy. The paper discovers that, the six party talks is a diplomatic way of engaging the provoked north to halt its nuclear ambition, for failure to denuclearize north Korea may serve as a great threat to US ally (south Korea) in the region. The paper concludes that, there is western nuclear strategy to dominate the global military industrial complex and warfare around the world-hence the perpetual subjugation of the global armament and the strategic deterrence of non proliferation. The paper recommends mutual understanding, respect to the sovereignty of states and balance of power among other things.

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

Quote and Order Details

Contact Person

Invoice Address

Notes or Comments

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

Great Powersa Conflict Management and Resolution in South-East Asia: An Evaluation of North-Korean Denuclearization Process and Six Party Talks

Sheriff Ghali Ibrahim
Sheriff Ghali Ibrahim University of Abuja
Yusuf Ali Zoaka
Yusuf Ali Zoaka
Bibi Farouq
Bibi Farouq

Research Journals