Isolated Traffic Signal Control using Nash Bargaining Optimization

Hesham A. Rakha

Isolated Traffic Signal Control using Nash Bargaining Optimization

Hesham A. Rakha * §

Contact

Mansoura University

Isolated Traffic Signal Control using Nash Bargaining Optimization

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

RE1368N

Isolated Traffic Signal Control using Nash Bargaining Optimization Banner

AI TAKEAWAY

Abstract

This paper presents a novel isolated traffic signal control algorithm based on a gametheoretic optimization framework. The algorithm models a signalized intersection considering four phases, where each phase is modeled as a player in a game in which the players cooperate to reach a mutual agreement. The Nash bargaining solution is applied to obtain the optimal control strategy, considering a variable phasing sequence and free cycle length. The system is implemented and evaluated in the INTEGRATION microscopic traffic assignment and simulation software. The proposed algorithm is compared to an optimum fixed-time plan and an actuated control algorithm to evaluate the performance of the proposed Nash bargaining approach for different traffic demand levels. The simulation results demonstrate that the proposed Nash bargaining control algorithm outperforms the fixed-time and actuated control algorithms for the various traffic conditions. The benefits are observed in improvements in the stopped delay, queue length, travel time, average vehicle speed, system throughput, fuel consumption, and emission levels.

References

31 Cites in Article

Reference Format

Y Dai,D Zhao,Z Zhang (2012). Computational intelligence in urban traffic signal control: A survey.
C Daganzo (1997). Fundamentals of Transportation and Traffic Operations.
Ayad Turky,M Ahmad,M Yusoff,Baraa Hammad (2009). Using Genetic Algorithm for Traffic Light Control System with a Pedestrian Crossing.
X Yang (2001). Comparison among computer packages in providing timing plans for iowa arterial in lawrence, kansas.
R Roess,E Prassas,W Mcshane (2010). Traffic Engineering.
L French,M French (2006). Benefits of signal timing optimization and its to corridor operations.
P Hunt,D Robertson,R Bretherton,R Winton (1981). Scoota traffic responsive method of coordinating signals.
A Sims,K Dobinson (1979). The Sydney coordinated adaptive traffic (SCAT) system philosophy and benefits.
K Head,P Mirchandani,D Sheppard (1992). Hierarchical framework for real-time traffic contro.
N Gartner (1983). Opac: A demand-responsive strategy for traffic signal control.
M Evans (2010). Balancing safety and capacity in an adaptive signal control system -phase 1.
Samah El-Tantawy,Baher Abdulhai,Hossam Abdelgawad (2013). Multiagent Reinforcement Learning for Integrated Network of Adaptive Traffic Signal Controllers (MARLIN-ATSC): Methodology and Large-Scale Application on Downtown Toronto.
J Chen (1998). Game-theoretic formulations of interaction between dynamic traffic control and dynamic traffic assignment.
Mohammed Elhenawy,Ahmed Elbery,Abdallah Hassan,Hesham Rakha (2015). An Intersection Game-Theory-Based Traffic Control Algorithm in a Connected Vehicle Environment.
L Jun (2003). Study on game-theory-based integration model for traffic control and route guidance.
T Linglong,Z Xiaohua,H Dunli,S Yanzhang,W Ren (2010). A study of single intersection traffic signal control based on two-player cooperation game model.
Z Han,D Niyato,W Saad,T Basar,A Hjorungnes (2012). Game Theory in Wireless and Communication Networks: Theory, Models, and Applications.
G Lai,C Li,K Sycara,J Giampapa (2004). Literature review on multiattribute negotiations.
Hyunggon Park,Mihaela Van Der Schaar (2007). Bargaining Strategies for Networked Multimedia Resource Management.
Z Han,K Liu (2005). Fair multiuser channel allocation for ofdma networks using nash bargaining solutions and coalitions.
Z Zhang,H Chen,M Guizani,P Qiu (2008). A cooperation strategy based on nash bargaining solution in cooperative relay networks.
Paul Grout (1984). Investment and Wages in the Absence of Binding Contracts: A Nash Bargaining Approach.
A Mcdonald,R Solow (1981). Wage bargaining and employment.
Erik Larsson,Eduard Jorswieck (2008). Competition Versus Cooperation on the MISO Interference Channel.
P Holm,D Tomich,J Sloboden,C Lowrance (2007). National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
Eduardo Camponogara,Werner Kraus (2003). Distributed Learning Agents in Urban Traffic Control.
D Oliveira,A Bazzan (2006). Reinforcement learningbased control of traffic lights in non-stationary environments.
S Ei-Tantawy,B Abdulhai (2010). An agent-based learning towards decentralized and coordinated traffic signal control.
S El-Tantawy,B Abdulhai,H Abdelgawad (2014). Design of reinforcement learning parameters for seamless application of adaptive traffic signal control.
M Aerde,H Rakha (2013). Integration release 2.40 for windows: User's guide-volume ii: Advanced model features.
John Sangster,Hesham Rakha (2014). Enhancing and Calibrating the Rakha-Pasumarthy-Adjerid Car-Following Model using Naturalistic Driving Data.

Download References

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Hesham A. Rakha. 2017. "Isolated Traffic Signal Control using Nash Bargaining Optimization". Global Journal of Research in Engineering - B: Automotive Engineering GJRE-B Volume 16 (GJRE Volume 16 Issue B1).

More Citation Formats

Select Citation Style:

Download Citation

GJRE Volume 16 Issue B1

Explore Journals Explore Volume Read This Issue

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/gjre

Print ISSN 0975-5861

e-ISSN 2249-4596

Keywords

Not Found

Classification

GJRE-B Classification FOR Code: 090299

Submission ReceivedDecember 12, 2015
Peer Review Double Blind
Handling Editor
Accepted January 1, 2016
Published January 15, 2016

Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

February 9, 2017

Language

English

Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

View in VR

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

View in 3D

Article Matrices

Total Score: 103

Country: Egypt

Subject: Global Journal of Research in Engineering

Authors: Hossam M. Abdelghaffar, Hao Yang, Hesham A. Rakha (PhD/Dr. count: 0)

View Count (all-time): 419

Total Views (Real + Logic): 1291

Total Downloads (simulated): 104

Publish Date: 2016 01, Fri

Monthly Totals (Real + Logic):

Month 1: 45 views
Month 2: 27 views
Month 3: 37 views
Month 4: 62 views
Month 5: 57 views
Month 6: 28 views
Month 7: 42 views
Month 8: 25 views
Month 9: 37 views
Month 10: 39 views
Month 11: 51 views
Month 12: 11 views
Month 13: 37 views
Month 14: 13 views
Month 15: 38 views
Month 16: 17 views
Month 17: 30 views
Month 18: 21 views
Month 19: 36 views
Month 20: 45 views
Month 21: 40 views
Month 22: 14 views
Month 23: 31 views
Month 24: 41 views
Month 25: 41 views
Month 26: 37 views
Month 27: 40 views
Month 28: 28 views
Month 29: 31 views
Month 30: 22 views
Month 31: 20 views
Month 32: 25 views
Month 33: 22 views
Month 34: 37 views
Month 35: 32 views
Month 36: 23 views
Month 37: 43 views
Month 38: 31 views
Month 39: 42 views
Month 40: 28 views
Month 41: 35 views
Month 42: 32 views
Month 43: 19 views
Month 44: 33 views
Month 45: 32 views
Month 46: 32 views
Month 47: 37 views
Month 48: 35 views
Month 49: 28 views
Month 50: 45 views
Month 51: 46 views
Month 52: 34 views
Month 53: 20 views
Month 54: 38 views
Month 55: 47 views
Month 56: 43 views
Month 57: 33 views
Month 58: 29 views
Month 59: 36 views
Month 60: 26 views
Month 61: 27 views
Month 62: 29 views
Month 63: 30 views
Month 64: 22 views
Month 65: 36 views
Month 66: 29 views
Month 67: 21 views
Month 68: 45 views
Month 69: 35 views
Month 70: 36 views
Month 71: 17 views
Month 72: 34 views
Month 73: 47 views
Month 74: 30 views
Month 75: 40 views
Month 76: 31 views
Month 77: 27 views
Month 78: 25 views
Month 79: 28 views
Month 80: 41 views
Month 81: 27 views
Month 82: 20 views
Month 83: 39 views
Month 84: 21 views
Month 85: 26 views
Month 86: 29 views
Month 87: 26 views
Month 88: 49 views
Month 89: 42 views
Month 90: 25 views
Month 91: 27 views
Month 92: 18 views
Month 93: 40 views
Month 94: 36 views
Month 95: 35 views
Month 96: 42 views
Month 97: 29 views
Month 98: 36 views
Month 99: 29 views
Month 100: 43 views
Month 101: 14 views
Month 102: 25 views
Month 103: 34 views
Month 104: 39 views
Month 105: 27 views
Month 106: 30 views
Month 107: 42 views
Month 108: 42 views
Month 109: 38 views
Month 110: 35 views
Month 111: 48 views
Month 112: 40 views
Month 113: 36 views
Month 114: 42 views
Month 115: 47 views
Month 116: 27 views
Month 117: 33 views
Month 118: 27 views
Month 119: 20 views
Month 120: 35 views
Month 121: 28 views
Month 122: 50 views
Month 123: 30 views
Month 124: 11 views
Month 125: 17 views
Month 126: 52 views
Month 127: 40 views
Month 128: 35 views
Month 129: 33 views

Total Views: 1.3K

Total Downloads: 104

All Trends