Modeling and Experimental Analysis of Effect of Tool Geometry on Single Point Incremental Sheet Metal Forming

Rahul Pachori

Modeling and Experimental Analysis of Effect of Tool Geometry on Single Point Incremental Sheet Metal Forming

Rahul Pachori * §

Contact

§ Mewar University

Modeling and Experimental Analysis of Effect of Tool Geometry on Single Point Incremental Sheet Metal Forming

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

RER47QA

Modeling and Experimental Analysis of Effect of Tool Geometry on Single Point Incremental Sheet Metal Forming Banner

Key Research Insights

Synthesized scholarly intelligence & interactive research assistant

This converted HTML version may contain rendering inconsistencies. Please refer to the PDF for the authoritative version, or click here to provide feedback.

Abstract

Dieless manufacturing process involves progressive deformation of the sheet metal using a punch (or tool). During the incremental deformation process, the sheet may or may not be supported on its back side. There are various factors that affect the process of die less sheet forming. The objective of this work is to identify the effect of tool geometry on formability of sheet metal components in the case of single point incremental sheet metal forming. For this purpose numbers of experiments have been performed with three different tool geometries, which are spherical tool, elliptical tool tip with straight diameter and elliptical tool tip with tapered diameter. The entire exercise has also been simulated in virtual environment and a good correlation between the simulation and the experimental work is observed. It has been observed that the results of the analysis would help to improve the selection of appropriate tool and obtain better forming limit for a given sheet metal.

References

20 Cites in Article

Reference Format

1. S Matsubara (2001). A computer numerically controlled dieless incremental forming of a sheet metal. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 215(7), 959-966.
2. L Filice,L Fratini,F Micari (2002). Analysis of Material Formability in Incremental Forming. The International Academy for Production Engineering (CIRP Annals), 51, 199-202.
3. J Jeswiet,Joost Duflou,Alexander Szekeres (2001). Forces in Single Point and Two Point Incremental Forming. Advanced Materials Research, 449-456.
4. H Amino,Y Lu,S Ozawa,K Fukuda,T Maki (2002). Dieless NC Forming of Automotive Service Parts. 7th ITCP, 1015-1020.
5. J Jeswiet,E Hagan (2001). Rapid Proto-typing of a Headlight with Sheet Metal. Proceedings of Shelmet, 165-170.
6. T Kim,D Yang (2001). Improvement of formability for the incremental sheet metal forming process. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 42(7), 1271-1286.
7. D Leach,A Green,A Bramley (2001). A new incremental sheet forming process for small batch and prototype parts. 9th International Conference on Sheet Metal, 211-218.
8. S Matsubara (1994). Incremental Backward Bulge Forming of a Sheet Metal with a Hemispherical Tool. Journal of the JSTP, 35, 1311-1316.
9. V Franzen,L Kwiatkowski,G Sebastiani,A Shankar,M Tekkaya,Kleiner (2008). Dyna-Die: Towards Full Kinematic Incremental Forming. Institute of Forming Technology and Lightweight Construction, 301(1), 1163-1166.
10. Timo Schafer,Rolf Dieter Schraft (2005). Incremental sheet metal forming by industrial robots. Rapid Prototyping Journal, 11(5), 278-286.
11. L Vihtonen,A Puzik,T Katajarinne (2008). Comparing Two Robot Assisted Incremental Forming Methods: Incremental Forming by Pressing and Incremental Hammering. 11th ESAFORM 2008 Conference on Material Forming: Proceedings Mini Symposia
12. M Callegari,D Amodio,E Ceretti,C Giardini (2006). Sheet Incremental Forming: Advantages of Robotised Cells vs. Programming Simulation and Applications, 493-514.
13. H Meier,O Dewald,Jian Zhang (2005). A New Robot-Based Sheet Metal Forming Process. Advanced Materials Research, 465-470.
14. Kimiyoshi Kitazawa,Shintaro Hayashi,Sumio Yamazaki (2001). Hemispherical stretch-expanding of aluminum sheet by computerized numerically controlled incremental forming process with two path method. Journal of Japan Institute of Light Metals, 46(5), 219-224.
15. Kimiyoshi Kitazawa,Masakatsu Nakane (1997). Hemi-ellipsoidal stretch-expanding of aluminum sheet by CNC incremental forming process with two path method. Journal of Japan Institute of Light Metals, 47(8), 440-445.
16. L Filice,L Fratini,F Micari (2002). Analysis of material formability in incremental forming. The International Academy for Production Engineering, 51, 199-202.
17. E Ceretti,C Giardini,Attanasio (2004). Experimental and simulative results in sheet incremental forming on CNC machines. Journal of Material Processing Technology, 152, 176-184.
18. S Jadhav (2004). Basic Investigations of the Incremental Sheet Metal Forming Process on a CNC Milling Machine. Basic Investigations of the Incremental Sheet Metal Forming Process on a CNC Milling Machine
19. M Pohlak,R Küttner,J Majak (2004). Simulation of incremental forming processes of sheet metal.
20. Adam Hassan,Fadi Oudah (1998). Rf-Dyna — Software for Optimized Random Finite Element Simulation Using Ls-Dyna. LS-DYNA Theoretical manual, Live more software technology corporation

Download References

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Rahul Pachori. 2017. "Modeling and Experimental Analysis of Effect of Tool Geometry on Single Point Incremental Sheet Metal Forming". Global Journal of Research in Engineering - A : Mechanical & Mechanics GJRE-A Volume 17 (GJRE Volume 17 Issue A1).

More Citation Formats

Select Citation Style:

Download Citation

GJRE Volume 17 Issue A1

Explore Journals Explore Volume Read This Issue

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/gjre

Print ISSN 0975-5861

e-ISSN 2249-4596

Keywords

Not Found

Classification

GJRE-A Classification FOR Code: 861206

010102

Submission ReceivedDecember 11, 2016
Peer Review Double Blind
Handling Editor
Accepted December 31, 2016
Published January 15, 2017

Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

July 11, 2017

Language

English

Order Article Reprint

Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

View in VR

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

View in 3D

Article Matrices

Total Score: 102

Country: India

Subject: Global Journal of Research in Engineering

Authors: Rahul Pachori, Naveen Agrawal (PhD/Dr. count: 0)

View Count (all-time): 359

Total Views (Real + Logic): 1107

Total Downloads (simulated): 98

Publish Date: 2017 01, Sun

Monthly Totals (Real + Logic):

Month 1: 58 views
Month 2: 53 views
Month 3: 24 views
Month 4: 29 views
Month 5: 30 views
Month 6: 36 views
Month 7: 38 views
Month 8: 29 views
Month 9: 28 views
Month 10: 41 views
Month 11: 41 views
Month 12: 36 views
Month 13: 46 views
Month 14: 25 views
Month 15: 23 views
Month 16: 24 views
Month 17: 32 views
Month 18: 39 views
Month 19: 36 views
Month 20: 25 views
Month 21: 18 views
Month 22: 22 views
Month 23: 15 views
Month 24: 32 views
Month 25: 24 views
Month 26: 22 views
Month 27: 30 views
Month 28: 19 views
Month 29: 26 views
Month 30: 25 views
Month 31: 28 views
Month 32: 40 views
Month 33: 30 views
Month 34: 39 views
Month 35: 45 views
Month 36: 32 views
Month 37: 33 views
Month 38: 31 views
Month 39: 20 views
Month 40: 29 views
Month 41: 29 views
Month 42: 42 views
Month 43: 26 views
Month 44: 30 views
Month 45: 19 views
Month 46: 26 views
Month 47: 42 views
Month 48: 36 views
Month 49: 20 views
Month 50: 12 views
Month 51: 46 views
Month 52: 31 views
Month 53: 27 views
Month 54: 39 views
Month 55: 33 views
Month 56: 41 views
Month 57: 32 views
Month 58: 22 views
Month 59: 36 views
Month 60: 16 views
Month 61: 34 views
Month 62: 26 views
Month 63: 46 views
Month 64: 31 views
Month 65: 29 views
Month 66: 36 views
Month 67: 14 views
Month 68: 26 views
Month 69: 19 views
Month 70: 37 views
Month 71: 38 views
Month 72: 33 views
Month 73: 39 views
Month 74: 24 views
Month 75: 40 views
Month 76: 35 views
Month 77: 28 views
Month 78: 40 views
Month 79: 35 views
Month 80: 32 views
Month 81: 21 views
Month 82: 19 views
Month 83: 33 views
Month 84: 21 views
Month 85: 28 views
Month 86: 23 views
Month 87: 25 views
Month 88: 20 views
Month 89: 21 views
Month 90: 18 views
Month 91: 19 views
Month 92: 29 views
Month 93: 22 views
Month 94: 19 views
Month 95: 41 views
Month 96: 37 views
Month 97: 16 views
Month 98: 13 views
Month 99: 36 views
Month 100: 16 views
Month 101: 43 views
Month 102: 55 views
Month 103: 35 views
Month 104: 22 views
Month 105: 43 views
Month 106: 30 views
Month 107: 27 views
Month 108: 40 views
Month 109: 23 views
Month 110: 27 views
Month 111: 24 views
Month 112: 44 views
Month 113: 26 views
Month 114: 41 views
Month 115: 32 views
Month 116: 31 views
Month 117: 43 views

Total Views: 1.1K

Total Downloads: 98

All Trends