On the Squeezing flow of Nanofluid through Porous Medium with Slip Boundary and Magnetic Field: A Comparative Study of Three Approximate Analytical Methods

On the Squeezing flow of Nanofluid through Porous Medium with Slip Boundary and Magnetic Field: A Comparative Study of Three Approximate Analytical Methods

M. G. Sobamowo

Contact

L. O. Jayesimi

Contact

M. A. Whaeed

Contact

University of Lagos

On the Squeezing flow of Nanofluid through Porous Medium with Slip Boundary and Magnetic Field: A Comparative Study of Three Approximate Analytical Methods

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

YA8F9

AI TAKEAWAY

Connecting with the Eternal Ground

Abstract

This paper presents a comparative study of approximate analytical methods is carried out using differential transformation, homotopy perturbation and variation parameter methods for the analysis of a steady two-dimensional axisymmetric flow of nanofluid under the influence of a uniform transverse magnetic field with slip boundary condition. Also, parametric studies are carried out to investigate the effects of fluid properties, magnetic field and slip parameters on the squeezing flow. It is revealed from the results that the velocity of the fluid increases with increase in the magnetic parameter under the influence of slip condition while an opposite trend is recorded during no-slip condition. Also, the velocity of the fluid increases as the slip parameter increases but it decreases with increase in the magnetic field parameter and Reynold number under the no-slip condition.

References

50 Cites in Article

Reference Format

M Stefan (1874). Versuch Uber die scheinbare adhesion.
Osborne Reynolds (1886). IV. On the theory of lubrication and its application to Mr. Beauchamp tower’s experiments, including an experimental determination of the viscosity of olive oil.
F Archibald,F (1956). Load Capacity and Time Relations for Squeeze Films.
J Jackson (1962). A study of squeezing flow.
R Usha,Rukmani Sridharan (1996). Arbitrary squeezing of a viscous fluid between elliptic plates.
W Wolfe (1965). Squeeze film pressures.
K Yang (1958). Unsteady laminar boundary layers in an incom-pressible stagnation flow.
Dennis Kuzma (1968). Fluid inertia effects in squeeze films.
J Tichy,W Winer (1970). Inertial considerations in parallel circular squeeze film bearings.
R Grimm (1976). Squeezing flows of Newtonian liquid films: an analysis include the fluid inertia.
G Birkh (1960). Hydrodynamics, a Study in Logic, Fact and Similitude.
C-Y Wang (1976). The Squeezing of a Fluid Between Two Plates.
C Wang,L Watson (1979). Squeezing of a viscous fluid between elliptic plates.
M Hamdan,R Baron (1992). Analysis of the squeezing flow of dusty fluids.
P Nhan (2000). Squeeze flow of a viscoelastic solid.
U Khan,N Ahmed,S Khan,B Saima,S Mohyud-Din (2014). Unsteady Squeezing flow of Casson fluid between parallel plates.
M Rashidi,H Shahmohamadi,S Dinarv (2008). Analytic approximate solutions for unsteady two dimensional and axisymmetric squeezing flows between parallel plates.
H Duwairi,Bourhan Tashtoush,Rebhia. Damseh (2004). On heat transfer effects of a viscous fluid squeezed and extruded between two parallel plates.
A Qayyum,M Awais,A Alsaedi,T Hayat (2012). Squeezing flow of non-Newtonian second grade fluids and micro polar models.
M Hamdam,R Baron (1992). Analysis of squeezing flow of dusty fluids.
M Mahmood,S Asghar,M Hossain (2007). Squeezed flow and heat transfer over a porous surface for viscous fluid.
M Hatami,D Jing Differential Transformation Method for Newtonian and non-Newtonian nanofluids flow analysis: Compared to numerical solution.
Syed Mohyud-Din,Zulfiqar Zaidi,Umar Khan,Naveed Ahmed (2014). On heat and mass transfer analysis for the flow of a nanofluid between rotating parallel plates.
S Mohyud-Din,S Khan (2016). Nonlinear radiation effects on squeezing flow of a Cass on fluid between parallel disks.
M Qayyum,H Khan,M Rahim,I Ullah (2015). Modeling and Analysis of Unsteady Axisymmetric Squeezing Fluid Flow through Porous Medium Channel with Slip Boundary.
Mubashir Qayyum,Hamid Khan (2016). BEHAVIORAL STUDY OF UNSTEADY SQUEEZING FLOW THROUGH POROUS MEDIUM.
M Mustafa,Hayat,S Obaidat (2012). On heat and mass transfer in the unsteady squeezing flow between parallel plates.
A Siddiqui,S Irum,A Ansari (2008). Unsteady squeezing flow of viscous MHD fluid between parallel plates.
G Domairry,A Aziz (2009). Approximate analysis of MHD squeeze flow between two parallel disk with suction or injection by homotopy perturbation method.
Nilankush Acharya,Kalidas Das,Prabir Kundu (2016). The squeezing flow of Cu-water and Cu-kerosene nanofluids between two parallel plates.
N Ahmed,U Khan,X Yang,S Khan,Z Zaidi,S Mohyud-Din (2013). Magneto hydrodynamic (MHD) squeezing flow of a Casson fluid between parallel disks.
Naveed Ahmed,Umar Khan,Zulfiqar Zaidi,Saeed Jan,Asif Waheed,Syed Mohyud-Din (2014). MHD FLOW OF AN INCOMPRESSIBLE FLUID THROUGH POROUS MEDIUM BETWEEN DILATING AND SQUEEZING PERMEABLE WALLS.
U Khan,N Ahmed,S Khan,Z Zaidi,X Yang,S Mohyud-Din (2014). On unsteady twodimensional and axisymmetric squeezing flow between parallel plates.
U Khan,N Ahmed,Z Zaidi,M Asadullah,S Mohyud-Din (2014). MHD squeezing flow between two infinite plates.
T Hayat,A Yousaf,M Mustafa,S Obadiat (2011). MHD squeezing flow of second grade fluid between parallel disks.
Hamid Khan,Mubashir Qayyum,Omar Khan,Murtaza Ali (2016). Unsteady Squeezing Flow of Casson Fluid with Magnetohydrodynamic Effect and Passing through Porous Medium.
A Ullah,M Rahim,H Khan,M Qayyum (2016). Analytical Analysis of Squeezing Flow in Porous Medium with MHD Effect.
R Grimm (1976). Squeezing flows of Newtonian liquid films an analysis including fluid inertia.
W Hughes,R Elco (1962). Magneto hydrodynamic lubrication flow between parallel rotating disks.
S Kamiyama (1969). Inertia Effects in MHD Hydrostatic Thrust Bearing.
E Hamza (1988). Magneto hydrodynamic squeeze film.
S Bhattacharyya,A Pal (1997). Unsteady MHD squeezing flow between two parallel rotating discs.
S Islam,H Khan,I Shah,G Zaman (2011). Anaxisymmetric squeezing fluid flow between the two infinite parallel plates in a porous medium channel.
C.-L.-M.-H Navier (1823). Des lois qui favorisent l’autonomie et des lois qui contrôlent les corps: Gros plan sur l’impact des lois et des réglementations sur l’autonomie corporell.
C Le Roux (1999). Existence and uniqueness of the flow of second grade fluids with slip boundary conditions.
A Ebaid (2008). Effects of magnetic field and wall slip conditions on the peristaltic transport of a Newtonian fluid in an asymmetric channel.
Lawrence Rhoades,Ralph Resnick,Ted O'bradovich,Steven Stegman (1996). Abrasive Flow Machining of Cylinder Heads and Its Positive Effects on Performance and Cost Characteristics.
T Hayat,M Qureshi,N Ali (2008). The influence of slip on the peristaltic motion of a third order fluid in an asymmetric channel.
T Hayat,S Abelman (2007). A numerical study of the influence of slip boundary condition on rotating flow.
S Abelman,E Momoniat,T Hayat (2009). Steady MHD flow of a third grade fluid in a rotating frame and porous space.

Download References

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

M. G. Sobamowo. 2017. \u201cOn the Squeezing flow of Nanofluid through Porous Medium with Slip Boundary and Magnetic Field: A Comparative Study of Three Approximate Analytical Methods\u201d. Global Journal of Research in Engineering - A : Mechanical & Mechanics GJRE-A Volume 17 (GJRE Volume 17 Issue A6).

More Citation Formats

Select Citation Style:

Download Citation

GJRE Volume 17 Issue A6

Explore Journals Explore Volume Read This Issue

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/gjre

Print ISSN 0975-5861

e-ISSN 2249-4596

Keywords

Not Found

Classification

GJRE-A Classification FOR Code: 091399

Submission ReceivedDecember 7, 2016
Peer Review Double Blind
Handling Editor
Accepted December 31, 2016
Published January 15, 2017

Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

December 6, 2017

Language

Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

View in VR

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

View in 3D

Article Matrices

Total Score: 103

Country: Nigeria

Subject: Global Journal of Research in Engineering - A : Mechanical & Mechanics

Authors: M. G. Sobamowo, L. O. Jayesimi, M. A. Whaeed (PhD/Dr. count: 0)

View Count (all-time): 276

Total Views (Real + Logic): 3481

Total Downloads (simulated): 1605

Publish Date: 2017 12, Wed

Monthly Totals (Real + Logic):

Month 1: 47 views
Month 2: 50 views
Month 3: 54 views
Month 4: 28 views
Month 5: 42 views
Month 6: 42 views
Month 7: 30 views
Month 8: 56 views
Month 9: 37 views
Month 10: 55 views
Month 11: 21 views
Month 12: 23 views
Month 13: 30 views
Month 14: 23 views
Month 15: 39 views
Month 16: 21 views
Month 17: 19 views
Month 18: 32 views
Month 19: 40 views
Month 20: 37 views
Month 21: 20 views
Month 22: 26 views
Month 23: 30 views
Month 24: 16 views
Month 25: 33 views
Month 26: 29 views
Month 27: 32 views
Month 28: 36 views
Month 29: 25 views
Month 30: 25 views
Month 31: 34 views
Month 32: 20 views
Month 33: 32 views
Month 34: 43 views
Month 35: 21 views
Month 36: 42 views
Month 37: 29 views
Month 38: 29 views
Month 39: 33 views
Month 40: 34 views
Month 41: 38 views
Month 42: 35 views
Month 43: 48 views
Month 44: 31 views
Month 45: 27 views
Month 46: 24 views
Month 47: 35 views
Month 48: 18 views
Month 49: 21 views
Month 50: 34 views
Month 51: 35 views
Month 52: 37 views
Month 53: 13 views
Month 54: 19 views
Month 55: 29 views
Month 56: 30 views
Month 57: 42 views
Month 58: 36 views
Month 59: 33 views
Month 60: 32 views
Month 61: 34 views
Month 62: 36 views
Month 63: 28 views
Month 64: 35 views
Month 65: 34 views
Month 66: 28 views
Month 67: 24 views
Month 68: 25 views
Month 69: 38 views
Month 70: 25 views
Month 71: 35 views
Month 72: 26 views
Month 73: 33 views
Month 74: 29 views
Month 75: 36 views
Month 76: 38 views
Month 77: 30 views
Month 78: 29 views
Month 79: 35 views
Month 80: 27 views
Month 81: 30 views
Month 82: 30 views
Month 83: 36 views
Month 84: 25 views
Month 85: 27 views
Month 86: 14 views
Month 87: 29 views
Month 88: 44 views
Month 89: 21 views
Month 90: 40 views
Month 91: 44 views
Month 92: 29 views
Month 93: 23 views
Month 94: 20 views
Month 95: 46 views
Month 96: 31 views
Month 97: 33 views
Month 98: 43 views
Month 99: 52 views
Month 100: 35 views
Month 101: 58 views

Total Views: 3481

Total Downloads: 1605

2026 Trends

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]