Pre-Service STEM Majors Understanding of Slope According to Common Core Mathematics Standards: An Exploratory Study

α
Xiaoxia A. Newton
Xiaoxia A. Newton
σ
Rebecca C. Poon
Rebecca C. Poon
α University of Massachusetts Lowell University of Massachusetts Lowell

Send Message

To: Author

Pre-Service STEM Majors Understanding of Slope According to Common Core Mathematics Standards: An Exploratory Study

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

MU06G

Pre-Service STEM Majors Understanding of Slope According to Common Core Mathematics Standards: An Exploratory Study Banner

AI TAKEAWAY

Connecting with the Eternal Ground
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scots Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sundanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu

Abstract

Common Core Mathematics Standards (CCMS) is a major effort at revamping the U.S. K-12 mathematics education in order to improve American students’ mathematical performance and international competitiveness. To ensure the successful implementation of CCMS, there have been calls for both recruiting from those with the strongest quantitative backgrounds (e.g., STEM majors) and offering rigorous mathematics training in teacher preparation. Missing from the literature are questions of whether STEM majors who arguably represent the strongest candidates for the teaching force have the depth of content understanding in order to teach mathematical topics at the rigorous level that CCMS expects, and whether future mathematics teachers need the opportunities to learn rigorously the K-12 mathematical topics they are expected to teach down the road. Our paper addresses the knowledge gap in these two areas through investigating the understanding of the concept of slope among a group STEM majors who were enrolled in an undergraduate experimental teacher preparation program. We found that even among these students, there are holes in their conceptual understanding of slope and of the connection between linear equation and its graph. These weaknesses could pose challenges for their preparedness to teach the slope concept consistent with the rigor that CCMS calls for. Taking courses that specifically address the K-12 math topics is helpful. We discuss implications of these findings for the content preparation of mathematics teachers.

References

43 Cites in Article
  1. P Adams,G Krockover (1997). Beginning science teacher cognition and its origins in the preservice secondary science teacher program.
  2. R Askey (1999). Introduction.
  3. D Ball (1990). The mathematical understanding that prospective teachers bring to teacher education.
  4. D Ball,H Hill,H Bass (2005). Knowing mathematics for teaching: Who knows mathematics well enough to teach third grade, and how can we decide.
  5. D Ball,M Hoover,G Phelps (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special.
  6. J Baumert,M Kunter,W Blum,M Brunner,T Voss,A Jordan,U Klusmann (2010). Teachers' Mathematical Knowledge, Cognitive Activation in the Classroom, and Student Progress.
  7. M Buchmann (1984). The priority of knowledge and understanding in teaching.
  8. E Burger,D Chard,E Hall,P Kennedy,S Leinwand,F Renfro,B Waits (2007). Algebra 1.
  9. M Cochran-Smith,S Lytle (1999). Relationships of knowledge and practice: Teacher learning in communities.
  10. W Collins,A Foster,L Winters,W Swart,G Cuevas,J Rath,B Gordon (1998). Algebra 1: Integration Applications Connections.
  11. R Larson,L Boswell,T Kanold,L Stiff (2004). Algebra 1.
  12. R Larson,L Boswell,T Kanold,L Stiff (2004). Algebra 1: Concepts and skills.
  13. D Lortie (1975). Schoolteacher: A sociological study.
  14. T Loveless (2013). The 2013 Brown Center Report on American Education: How well are American students learning? With sections on the latest international tests, tracking and ability grouping.
  15. Liping Ma,Liping Ma (1999). Knowing and Teaching Elementary Mathematics.
  16. Deborah Moore-Russo,Annamarie Conner,Kristina Rugg (2011). Can slope be negative in 3-space? Studying concept image of slope through collective definition construction.
  17. (2014). PISA 2012 Results in Focus: What 15-year-olds know and what they can do with what they know.
  18. V Postelnicu (2011). Student difficulties with linearity and linear functions and teachers' understanding of student difficulties.
  19. V Postelnicu,C Greenes (2012). Do teachers know what their students know?.
  20. W Schmidt,R Houang (2012). Curricular coherence and the Common Core State Standards 7. for Mathematics.
  21. William Schmidt,Richard Houang,Leland Cogan (2011). Preparing Future Math Teachers.
  22. W Schmidt,C Mcknight,R Houang,H Wang,D Wiley,L Cogan,R Wolfe (2001). Why schools matter: A cross-national comparison of curriculum and learning.
  23. A Schoenfeld,J Kilpatrick (2008). Toward a Theory of Proficiency in Teaching Mathematics.
  24. L Shulman (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching.
  25. L Shulman (1999). Forward. In Knowing and teaching elementary mathematics: Teachers' understanding of fundamental mathematics in China and the United States.
  26. Richard Skemp (1976). Relational Understanding and Instrumental Understanding.
  27. M Stanton,D Moore-Russo (2012). Conceptualizations of slope: A review of state standards.
  28. Sheryl Stump (1999). Secondary mathematics teachers’ knowledge of slope.
  29. Sheryl Stump (2001). Developing preservice teachers' pedagogical content knowledge of slope.
  30. S Stump (2001). High school precalculus students' understanding of slope as measure.
  31. Dawn Teuscher,Robert Reys (2010). Connecting Research to Teaching: Slope, Rate of Change, and Steepness: Do Students Understand these Concepts?.
  32. J Walter,H Gerson (2007). Teachers' personal agency: Making sense of slope through additive structures.
  33. H Wu (2010). The mathematics teachers should know. Talk given at.
  34. H Wu (2010). Math interlude B: Linear algebra.
  35. H Wu (2011). The miss-education of mathematics teachers.
  36. Hung-Hsi Wu (2011). Understanding Numbers in Elementary School Mathematics.
  37. H Wu (2011). Professional development and Textbook school mathematics.
  38. H Wu (2011). Phoenix rising. Bringing the Common Core State Mathematics Standards to life.
  39. H Wu (2011). 1. What Teachers Need to Know About Language.
  40. H Wu (2014). Potential Impact of the Common Core Mathematics Standards on the American Curriculum.
  41. H Wu (2015). Textbook School Mathematics and the preparation of mathematics teachers.
  42. H Wu (2002). An Introduction to Vector Algebra.
  43. O Zaslavsky,H Sela,U Leron (2002). Being sloppy about slope: The effect of changing the scale.

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Xiaoxia A. Newton. 2015. \u201cPre-Service STEM Majors Understanding of Slope According to Common Core Mathematics Standards: An Exploratory Study\u201d. Global Journal of Human-Social Science - H: Interdisciplinary GJHSS-H Volume 15 (GJHSS Volume 15 Issue H7): .

Download Citation

Issue Cover
GJHSS Volume 15 Issue H7
Pg. 27- 42
Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJHSS

Print ISSN 0975-587X

e-ISSN 2249-460X

Keywords
Classification
GJHSS-H Classification: FOR Code: 780101
Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

October 7, 2015

Language
en
Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

Article Matrices
Total Views: 4160
Total Downloads: 2028
2026 Trends
Related Research

Published Article

Common Core Mathematics Standards (CCMS) is a major effort at revamping the U.S. K-12 mathematics education in order to improve American students’ mathematical performance and international competitiveness. To ensure the successful implementation of CCMS, there have been calls for both recruiting from those with the strongest quantitative backgrounds (e.g., STEM majors) and offering rigorous mathematics training in teacher preparation. Missing from the literature are questions of whether STEM majors who arguably represent the strongest candidates for the teaching force have the depth of content understanding in order to teach mathematical topics at the rigorous level that CCMS expects, and whether future mathematics teachers need the opportunities to learn rigorously the K-12 mathematical topics they are expected to teach down the road. Our paper addresses the knowledge gap in these two areas through investigating the understanding of the concept of slope among a group STEM majors who were enrolled in an undergraduate experimental teacher preparation program. We found that even among these students, there are holes in their conceptual understanding of slope and of the connection between linear equation and its graph. These weaknesses could pose challenges for their preparedness to teach the slope concept consistent with the rigor that CCMS calls for. Taking courses that specifically address the K-12 math topics is helpful. We discuss implications of these findings for the content preparation of mathematics teachers.

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

Quote and Order Details

Contact Person

Invoice Address

Notes or Comments

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

Pre-Service STEM Majors Understanding of Slope According to Common Core Mathematics Standards: An Exploratory Study

Xiaoxia A. Newton
Xiaoxia A. Newton University of Massachusetts Lowell
Rebecca C. Poon
Rebecca C. Poon

Research Journals