Loading menu…

Pre-Service STEM Majors Understanding of Slope According to Common Core Mathematics Standards: An Exploratory Study

§ University of Massachusetts Lowell

Send Message

To: Author

Pre-Service STEM Majors Understanding of Slope According to Common Core Mathematics Standards: An Exploratory Study

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

MU06G

Pre-Service STEM Majors Understanding of Slope According to Common Core Mathematics Standards: An Exploratory Study Banner

Key Research Insights

Synthesized scholarly intelligence & interactive research assistant
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scots Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sundanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu
Reading Preferences
Font Size
Line Spacing
Background
This converted HTML version may contain rendering inconsistencies. Please refer to the PDF for the authoritative version, or click here to provide feedback.

Abstract

Common Core Mathematics Standards (CCMS) is a major effort at revamping the U.S. K-12 mathematics education in order to improve American students’ mathematical performance and international competitiveness. To ensure the successful implementation of CCMS, there have been calls for both recruiting from those with the strongest quantitative backgrounds (e.g., STEM majors) and offering rigorous mathematics training in teacher preparation. Missing from the literature are questions of whether STEM majors who arguably represent the strongest candidates for the teaching force have the depth of content understanding in order to teach mathematical topics at the rigorous level that CCMS expects, and whether future mathematics teachers need the opportunities to learn rigorously the K-12 mathematical topics they are expected to teach down the road. Our paper addresses the knowledge gap in these two areas through investigating the understanding of the concept of slope among a group STEM majors who were enrolled in an undergraduate experimental teacher preparation program. We found that even among these students, there are holes in their conceptual understanding of slope and of the connection between linear equation and its graph. These weaknesses could pose challenges for their preparedness to teach the slope concept consistent with the rigor that CCMS calls for. Taking courses that specifically address the K-12 math topics is helpful. We discuss implications of these findings for the content preparation of mathematics teachers.

References

43 Cites in Article
  1. 1. Paul Adams,Gerald Krockover (1997). Beginning science teacher cognition and its origins in the preservice secondary science teacher program. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(6), 633-653.
  2. 2. R. Askey (1999). Knowing and teaching elementary mathematics. American Educator, 1-8.
  3. 3. Deborah Ball (1990). The Mathematical Understandings That Prospective Teachers Bring to Teacher Education. The Elementary School Journal, 90(4), 449-466.
  4. 4. D. Ball,H. Hill,H. Bass (2005). Knowing mathematics for teaching: Who knows mathematics well enough to teach third grade, and how can we decide. American Educator, 29(3), 14.
  5. 5. D. Ball,M. Hoover,G. Phelps (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special. Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389-407.
  6. 6. J. Baumert,M. Kunter,W. Blum,M. Brunner,T. Voss,A. Jordan,U. Klusmann (2010). Teachers’ Mathematical Knowledge, Cognitive Activation in the Classroom, and Student Progress. American Educational Research Journal, 47(1), 133-180.
  7. 7. M. Buchmann (1984). The priority of knowledge and understanding in teaching. In J. Raths and L. Katz (Eds.). Advances in teacher education, 1, 29-48.
  8. 8. E. Burger,D. Chard,E. Hall,P. Kennedy,S. Leinwand,F. Renfro,B. Waits (2007). Algebra 1. Orlando: Holt, Rinehart and Winston
  9. 9. Marilyn Cochran-Smith,Susan Lytle (1999). Chapter 8: Relationships of Knowledge and Practice: Teacher Learning in Communities. Review of Research in Education, 24(1), 249-305.
  10. 10. W. Collins,A. Foster,L. Winters,W. Swart,G. Cuevas,J. Rath,B. Gordon (1998). Algebra 1: Integration Applications Connections. New York: Glencoe/McGraw-Hill
  11. 11. R. Larson,L. Boswell,T. Kanold,L. Stiff (2004). Algebra 1. Evanston, IL: McDougal Littell
  12. 12. R. Larson,L. Boswell,T. Kanold,L. Stiff (2004). Algebra 1: Concepts and skills. Evanston, IL: McDougal Littell
  13. 13. D. Lortie (1975). Schoolteacher: A sociological study.
  14. 14. T. Loveless (2013). The 2013 Brown Center Report on American Education: How well are American students learning? With sections on the latest international tests, tracking and ability grouping, and advanced math in 8th grade. With sections on the latest international tests, tracking and ability grouping, and advanced math in 8th grade. Accessible at: ports/
  15. 15. L. Ma (1999). Knowing and teaching elementary mathematics: Teachers’ understanding of fundamental mathematics in China and the United States. Mahwah
  16. 16. D. Moore-Russo,A. Conner,K. Rugg (2011). Can slope be negative in 3-space? Studying concept image of slope through collective definition construction. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 76(1), 3-21.
  17. 17. OECD (2014). PISA 2012 Results in Focus: What 15-year-olds know and what they can do with what they know. Accessible at: org/pisa/keyfindings/pisa-2012results-overview.pdf, 17.
  18. 18. V. Postelnicu (2011). Student difficulties with linearity and linear functions and teachers' understanding of student difficulties (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses
  19. 19. V. Postelnicu,C. Greenes (2012). Do teachers know what their students know?. National Council of Supervisors of Mathematics Newsletter, 42(3), 14-15.
  20. 20. William Schmidt,Richard Houang (2012). Curricular Coherence and the Common Core State Standards for Mathematics. Educational Researcher, 41(8), 294-308.
  21. 21. William Schmidt,Richard Houang,Leland Cogan (2011). Preparing future math teachers. Education Forum. Science, 332(6035), 1266-1267.
  22. 22. W. Schmidt,C. McKnight,R. Houang,H. Wang,D. Wiley,L. Cogan,R. Wolfe (2001). Why schools matter: A cross-national comparison of curriculum and learning.
  23. 23. A. Schoenfeld,J. Kilpatrick (2008). Toward a Theory of Proficiency in Teaching Mathematics. International handbook of mathematics teacher education, 2, 1-35.
  24. 24. Lee Shulman (1986). Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.
  25. 25. L. Shulman (1999). Forward. In Knowing and teaching elementary mathematics: Teachers’ understanding of fundamental mathematics in China and the United States (Liping Ma). Knowing and teaching elementary mathematics: Teachers’ understanding of fundamental mathematics in China and the United States (Liping Ma). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
  26. 26. Richard Skemp (1976). R (1976/2006) Relational understanding and instrumental understanding. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 12(2), 88-95.
  27. 27. Michael Stanton,Deborah Moore‐russo (2012). Conceptualizations of Slope: A Review of State Standards. School Science and Mathematics, 112(5), 270-277.
  28. 28. Sheryl Stump (1999). Secondary mathematics teachers’ knowledge of slope. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 11(2), 124-144.
  29. 29. Sheryl Stump (2001). Developing preservice teachers' pedagogical content knowledge of slope. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 20(2), 207-227.
  30. 30. Sheryl Stump (2001). High School Precalculus Students' Understanding of Slope as Measure. School Science and Mathematics, 101(2), 81-89.
  31. 31. Dawn Teuscher,Robert Reys (2010). Connecting Research to Teaching: Slope, Rate of Change, and Steepness: Do Students Understand these Concepts?. The Mathematics Teacher, 103(7), 519-524.
  32. 32. J. Walter,H. Gerson (2007). Teachers’ Personal Agency: Making Sense of Slope Through Additive Structures. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 65(2), 205-233.
  33. 33. H. Wu (2010). The mathematics teachers should know. Talk given. Talk given at Lisbon, Portugal, on January
  34. 34. H. Wu (2010). Introduction to school algebra. Accessible at
  35. 35. H. Wu (2011). The miss-education of mathematics teachers. Notices of the American Mathematical Society, 58(3), 372-384.
  36. 36. Hung-Hsi Wu (2011). Understanding Numbers in Elementary School Mathematics. Providence
  37. 37. H. Wu (2011). Professional development and Textbook school mathematics.
  38. 38. H. Wu (2011). Phoenix rising. Bringing the Common Core State Mathematics Standards to life. American Educator, 35(3), 3-13.
  39. 39. H. Wu (2011). The Mathematics Early Grade Teachers Need to Know| and What It Means to Know It. Talk given at Rio de Janeiro
  40. 40. Hung-Hsi Wu (2014). Potential Impact of the Common Core Mathematics Standards on the American Curriculum. In Y. Li and G. Advances in Mathematics Education, 119-142.
  41. 41. H. Wu (2015). Textbook School Mathematics and the preparation of mathematics teachers. Accessible at
  42. 42. H. Wu From Pre-Algebra to Algebra, Volumes I and II. Algebra from A to Z
  43. 43. Orit Zaslavsky,Hagit Sela,Uri Leron (2002). Being sloppy about slope: The effect of changing the scale. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 49(1), 119-140.

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Xiaoxia A. Newton, Rebecca C. Poon. 2015. "Pre-Service STEM Majors Understanding of Slope According to Common Core Mathematics Standards: An Exploratory Study". Global Journal of Human-Social Science - H: Interdisciplinary GJHSS-H Volume 15 (GJHSS Volume 15 Issue 50 (H7)).

More Citation Formats

Download Citation

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJHSS

Print ISSN 0975-587X

e-ISSN 2249-460X

Keywords
Classification
GJHSS-H Classification FOR Code: 780101
Version of record
v1.2

Issue date
September 28, 2015

Language
English
Order Article Reprint
Experience in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

Article Matrices
Total Views: 1.4K
Total Downloads: 88
All Trends

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

Pre-Service STEM Majors Understanding of Slope According to Common Core Mathematics Standards: An Exploratory Study

Xiaoxia Newton
Xiaoxia Newton University of Massachusetts Lowell
Rebecca Poon
Rebecca Poon <p>University of Massachusetts Lowell</p>