Securing Distributed FPGA System using Commutative RSA Core

R. Ambika; S. Ramachandran; K. Kashwan

Securing Distributed FPGA System using Commutative RSA Core

R. Ambika * §

Contact

S. Ramachandran ‡

Contact

K. R. Kashwan ¶

Contact

§ Vinayaka Missions University, Salem, India

‡

S J B Institute of Technology, Bangalore, India

¶ Sona College of Engineering, Salem, India

Securing Distributed FPGA System using Commutative RSA Core

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

Z214G

Securing Distributed FPGA System using Commutative RSA Core Banner

Key Research Insights

Synthesized scholarly intelligence & interactive research assistant

This converted HTML version may contain rendering inconsistencies. Please refer to the PDF for the authoritative version, or click here to provide feedback.

Abstract

Protecting important data is of utmost concern to the organizations or multiple transceiver based communication systems and, cryptography is one of the primary ways to do the job. RSA algorithm is extensively used in the popular implementations of Public Key Infrastructures. Many cryptographic protocols and attacks on these protocols make use of the fact that the order in which encryption is performed does not affect the result of the encryption, i.e., encryption is commutative. On the other hand, the need of a security feature encompassing data authentication among multiple MIMO or transceivers has become very critical. This paper presents the implementation of a cryptography core based on Commutative RSA public key cryptography algorithm for accomplishing data security and authentication in environment comprising multiple FPGA cores without any key exchange overheads. In spite of considering conventional two terminal communications, we have implemented a scalable architecture for multi distributed FPGA based systems and realizes commutative RSA algorithm for verifying data security among multiple transceiver terminals. In this approach, a sophisticated RSA cryptographic technique based on commutative Encryption methodology has been implemented for distributed FPGA terminals. The proposed system architecture has used the Montgomery multiplication algorithm with exponential modular multiplication and Radix-2 multiplication based multiparty cryptography. The proposed multiplier is able to work with any precision of the input operands, limited only by memory or control constraints. The result obtained for this approach has illustrated a very high computational efficiency with minimum memory or space occupancy and higher operational frequency. The proposed PM based CRSA cryptography core has exhibited 12.1% higher throughput as compared to Serial Montgomery based CRSA. Similarly, the frequency or speed of the proposed system is also higher. The proposed system exhibits trade-off of 0.03% in power consumption.

References

22 Cites in Article

Reference Format

1. B. Premkumar (1992). An RNS to binary converter in 2n+1, 2n, 2n-1 moduli set. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. II, 39(7), 480-482.
CrossRef DOI
2. B. SCHNEIER (1996). Applied Cryptography: Protocols, Algorithms, and Source Code in C.
3. R. Rivest,A. Shamir,L. Adleman (1978). A method for obtaining digital signatures and public-key cryptosystems. Communications of the ACM, 21(2), 120-126.
CrossRef DOI
4. (1985). Modular multiplication without trial division. pp, 44(170), 519-521.
CrossRef DOI
5. S. Eldridge,C. Walter (1993). Hardware Implementation of Montgomery. pp, 42, 693-699.
6. A. Elbirt,C. Paar (1999). Toward an FPGA architecture optimized for public-key algorithms. the SPIE Symposium on Voice, Video and Communications, Sept
7. T. Blum,C. Paar (1999). Montgomery Exponentiation on Re-configurable Hardware. pp, 1999, 70-77.
8. Y. Kim,W. Kang,J. Choi (2000). Implementation of 1024-bit processor for RSA cryptosystem.
9. V. Bunimov,M. Schimmler,B. Tolg (2002). A Complexity-Effective Version of Montgomery’s Algorithm. Presented at the Workshop on Complexity Effective Designs (WECD02
10. Jean-Pierre Gustavo D. Sutter,José Luis (2011). Modular Multiplication and Exponentiation Architectures for Fast RSA Cryptosystem Based on Digit Serial Computation. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 58(7), 3101-3109.
CrossRef DOI
11. Jin-Hua Hong,Cheng-Wen Wu (2003). Cellular-Array Modular Multiplier for Fast RSA Public-Key Cryptosystem Based on Modified Booth’s Algorithm. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON VERY LARGE SCALE INTEGRATION SYSTEMS, 11
12. C. McIvor,M. McLoone,J. McCanny Modified Montgomery modular multiplication and RSA exponentiation techniques. IEE Proceedings online No. 20040791 DOI: 10.1049/ip-cdt
CrossRef DOI
13. Alexandre Tenca,C. Koc (2003). A scalable architecture for modular multiplication based on montgomery's algorithm. IEEE Transactions on Computers, 52(9), 1215-1221.
CrossRef DOI
14. Marcelo Kaihara,N. Takagi (2005). A Hardware Algorithm for Modular Multiplication/ Division. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON COMPUTERS, 54(01), 12-21.
CrossRef DOI
15. C. Koç,Acar,Tolga,B. Kaliski Analyzing and comparing Montgomery multiplication algorithms. Micro, IEEE Publication, 16, 5298231.
16. Tian-Sheuan Ching-Chao Yang,Chein- Jen (1998). A New RSA Cryptosystem Hardware Design Based on Montgomery’s Algorithm. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS—II: ANALOG AND DIGITAL SIGNAL PROCESSING, 45
17. Zhimin Chen,Patrick Schaumont (2011). A Parallel Implementation of Montgomery Multiplication on Multicore Systems: Algorithm, Analysis, and Prototype. IEEE Transactions on Computers, 60(12), 1692-1703.
CrossRef DOI
18. Guilherme Perin,Daniel Mesquita,JoãoBaptista Martins (2011). Montgomery Modular Multiplication on Reconfigurable Hardware: Systolic versus Multiplexed Implementation. International Journal of Reconfigurable Computing, 10.
CrossRef DOI
19. A. Fournaris,O. Koufopavlou (2005). A New RSA Encryption Architecture and Hardware Implementation based on Optimized Montgomery Multiplication. May, 2005, 4645-4648.
20. L. Batina,G. Muurling (2002). Montgomery in Practice: How to Do It More Efficiently in Hardware. pp, 40-52.
21. D. Walter (2002). Precise Bounds for Montgomery Modular Multiplication and Some Potentially Insecure RSA Moduli. pp, 30-39.
22. Nemanja Perovic,Mena Popovic-Bozovic (2012). FPGA implementation of RSA cryptoalgorithm using shift and carry algorithm. 2012 20th Telecommunications Forum (TELFOR, 1040-1043.
CrossRef DOI

Download References

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

R. Ambika, S. Ramachandran, K. R. Kashwan. 2013. "Securing Distributed FPGA System using Commutative RSA Core". Global Journal of Research in Engineering - F: Electrical & Electronic GJRE-F Volume 13 (GJRE Volume 13 Issue 48 (F15)).

More Citation Formats

Select Citation Style:

Download Citation

GJRE Volume 13 Issue 48 (F15)

Explore Journals Explore Volume Read This Issue

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/gjre

Print ISSN 0975-5861

e-ISSN 2249-4596

Keywords

Authentication Cryptography data security FPGA montgomery multiplication Radix-2 multiplier RSA cryptosystem

Classification

GJRE-F Classification FOR Code: 090699

Submission ReceivedDecember 12, 2012
Peer Review Double Blind
Handling Editor
Accepted January 4, 2013
Published January 15, 2013

Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

November 12, 2013

Language

English

Order Article Reprint

Experience in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

Article Matrices

Total Score: 103

Country: India

Subject: Global Journal of Research in Engineering - F: Electrical & Electronic

Authors: R. Ambika, S. Ramachandran, K. R. Kashwan (PhD/Dr. count: 0)

View Count (all-time): 399

Total Views (Real + Logic): 1559

Total Downloads (simulated): 80

Publish Date: 2013 11, Wed

Monthly Totals (Real + Logic):

Month 1: 59 views
Month 2: 58 views
Month 3: 59 views
Month 4: 31 views
Month 5: 32 views
Month 6: 36 views
Month 7: 36 views
Month 8: 39 views
Month 9: 49 views
Month 10: 28 views
Month 11: 29 views
Month 12: 17 views
Month 13: 37 views
Month 14: 37 views
Month 15: 36 views
Month 16: 32 views
Month 17: 37 views
Month 18: 25 views
Month 19: 23 views
Month 20: 26 views
Month 21: 37 views
Month 22: 37 views
Month 23: 33 views
Month 24: 39 views
Month 25: 36 views
Month 26: 34 views
Month 27: 30 views
Month 28: 35 views
Month 29: 47 views
Month 30: 46 views
Month 31: 23 views
Month 32: 34 views
Month 33: 28 views
Month 34: 41 views
Month 35: 26 views
Month 36: 28 views
Month 37: 31 views
Month 38: 21 views
Month 39: 36 views
Month 40: 21 views
Month 41: 21 views
Month 42: 21 views
Month 43: 34 views
Month 44: 44 views
Month 45: 14 views
Month 46: 27 views
Month 47: 14 views
Month 48: 25 views
Month 49: 35 views
Month 50: 14 views
Month 51: 32 views
Month 52: 19 views
Month 53: 40 views
Month 54: 17 views
Month 55: 38 views
Month 56: 30 views
Month 57: 31 views
Month 58: 35 views
Month 59: 39 views
Month 60: 31 views
Month 61: 20 views
Month 62: 25 views
Month 63: 45 views
Month 64: 32 views
Month 65: 42 views
Month 66: 37 views
Month 67: 24 views
Month 68: 16 views
Month 69: 32 views
Month 70: 49 views
Month 71: 31 views
Month 72: 42 views
Month 73: 27 views
Month 74: 23 views
Month 75: 33 views
Month 76: 24 views
Month 77: 26 views
Month 78: 31 views
Month 79: 35 views
Month 80: 25 views
Month 81: 17 views
Month 82: 39 views
Month 83: 16 views
Month 84: 22 views
Month 85: 27 views
Month 86: 19 views
Month 87: 37 views
Month 88: 21 views
Month 89: 23 views
Month 90: 47 views
Month 91: 35 views
Month 92: 22 views
Month 93: 28 views
Month 94: 27 views
Month 95: 41 views
Month 96: 36 views
Month 97: 44 views
Month 98: 35 views
Month 99: 35 views
Month 100: 12 views
Month 101: 32 views
Month 102: 41 views
Month 103: 25 views
Month 104: 23 views
Month 105: 18 views
Month 106: 33 views
Month 107: 43 views
Month 108: 40 views
Month 109: 17 views
Month 110: 21 views
Month 111: 39 views
Month 112: 27 views
Month 113: 41 views
Month 114: 25 views
Month 115: 35 views
Month 116: 28 views
Month 117: 42 views
Month 118: 44 views
Month 119: 40 views
Month 120: 41 views
Month 121: 41 views
Month 122: 37 views
Month 123: 24 views
Month 124: 30 views
Month 125: 37 views
Month 126: 25 views
Month 127: 41 views
Month 128: 31 views
Month 129: 14 views
Month 130: 41 views
Month 131: 43 views
Month 132: 34 views
Month 133: 34 views
Month 134: 31 views
Month 135: 18 views
Month 136: 24 views
Month 137: 28 views
Month 138: 16 views
Month 139: 27 views
Month 140: 40 views
Month 141: 37 views
Month 142: 53 views
Month 143: 26 views
Month 144: 33 views
Month 145: 50 views
Month 146: 30 views
Month 147: 57 views
Month 148: 58 views
Month 149: 45 views
Month 150: 43 views
Month 151: 24 views
Month 152: 15 views
Month 153: 41 views
Month 154: 15 views
Month 155: 30 views
Month 156: 28 views

Total Views: 1.6K

Total Downloads: 80

All Trends