Systematic Review of the Literature on Family Farming and the Social and Solidarity Economy in Brazil and Latin America

α
Pedro Henrique Mariosa
Pedro Henrique Mariosa
σ
Henrique dos Santos Pereira
Henrique dos Santos Pereira
α Universidade Federal do Amazonas Universidade Federal do Amazonas

Send Message

To: Author

Systematic Review of the Literature on Family Farming and the Social and Solidarity Economy in Brazil and Latin America

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

X32SG

Systematic Review of the Literature on Family Farming and the Social and Solidarity Economy in Brazil and Latin America Banner

AI TAKEAWAY

Connecting with the Eternal Ground
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scots Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sundanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu

Abstract

Concerned with the increase in hunger worldwide, as well as unemployment and the lack of equity in the distribution of income, the United Nations began to address genuinely Latin American scientific categories in its agendas, assemblies and task forces. The two main categories are Family Farming, with the recent establishment of the Family Farming decade (2019-2028) and the Social and Solidarity Economy as a tool for transposing the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in the Territories. Together, these categories can be responsible for achieving the SDGs in 78% of the world’s territory. There is a need, however, to clarify whether the science produced in Latin America also presents trends of intersection, in the search for the theoretical construction of a new paradigm of production and consumption. In this sense, the objective of this study was to identify trends in scientific production on the categories Family Farming and Social and Solidarity Economy. An adaptation of the PRISMA method was developed as a systematic literature review to identify these trends in the scientific field in Latin America.

References

89 Cites in Article
  1. Liliane Alcântara,Carlos Sampaio,Leire Zabala (2018). Experiencia Cooperativa de Mondragón: la educación cooperativa como un proceso de transformación social.
  2. Ana Amorim,Veridiana Rosso,Daniel Bandoni (2016). Acquisition of family farm foods for school meals: Analysis of public procurements within rural family farming published by the cities of São Paulo state.
  3. G April-Lalonde,S Latorre,M Paredes,M Hurtado,F Muñoz,A Deaconu,. Batal,M (2020). Characteristics and motivations of consumers of direct purchasing channels and the perceived barriers to alternative food purchase: A crosssectional study in the Ecuadorian Andes.
  4. G Bachelard (1938). A formação do espírito científico.
  5. A Baumel,L Basso (2004). Agricultura familiar e a sustentabilidade da pequena propriedade rural.
  6. L Bautista,H Sardá (2017). Economía Popular Solidaria: Un acercamiento desde el contexto cubano actual/Popular Solidarity Economy: an Approach from the Current Cuban Context.
  7. J Berdegue (2019). Open letter from Julio Berdegue, FAO Regional Representative. Decade of Family Farming.
  8. Bm -Banco Mundial (2020). COVID-19: No hay una tendencia común en los precios de los alimentos en la región de América Latina y el Caribe.
  9. Bm -Banco Mundial (2020). Agricultura -Datos Agricultura, valor agregado (% del PIB) -Brazil.
  10. J Bono,M Baranda (2019). Los valores de la Economía Social como impulsores del cambio en clústeres con fuerte fragmentación del conocimiento: el caso de la caña de azúcar de Veracruz (México).
  11. Brasil (2010). Sistema Nacional do Comércio Justo e Solidário.
  12. Suzanne Serruya,Ana Vasconcellos (2012). A Secretaria de Ciência e Tecnologia e Insumos Estratégicos do Ministério da Saúde e a pesquisa em alimentação e nutrição.
  13. Rafael Buralli,Helena Ribeiro,Thais Mauad,Luís Amato-Lourenço,João Salge,Fredi Diaz-Quijano,Renata Leão,Rejane Marques,Daniele Silva,Jean Guimarães (2018). Respiratory Condition of Family Farmers Exposed to Pesticides in the State of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
  14. V Burneo,G Sánchez (2018). Sistemas de relaciones de producción de participación social y comunitaria como base del desarrollo sustentable.
  15. Ioneide Campos,Yasmim Magalhães,Pamela Kikuchi,Pedro Jabur,Fabíola Rebouças,Girlene Pinheiro (2015). SAÚDE MENTAL E ECONOMIA SOLIDÁRIA: A EXPERIÊNCIA DE USUÁRIOS E TRABALHADORES DE UM CAPS II.
  16. M Campos,G Timóteo,A Arruda (2018). A dinâmica da pesca artesanal na Bacia de Campos: organização social e práticas em economia solidária entre os pescadores artesanais.
  17. E Carvalho,S Lago (2019). A apropriação de inovações na agricultura familiar: uma revisão sistemática da literatura.
  18. A Castiñeira (2020). La economía social y la recuperación del trabajo en Uruguay.
  19. Ademir Cazella,Clóvis Dorigon,Cristiano Nunes Nesi,Ludivine Eloy (2020). Sistemas agrícolas e alimentares de famílias rurais: análise da multilocalização familiar na região Oeste de Santa Catarina.
  20. C Compère,B Sak,J Schoenmaeckers (2021). Encyclopedia of the Social and Solidarity Economy.
  21. (2014). Texto de Referência da 3ª edição -Contextualização e Balanço Nacional.
  22. Judit Csoba (2020). A szociális gazdaságtól a szolidáris gazdaságig – a helyi gazdaságfejlesztési modell átalakulása - Modellváltás a helyi gazdaság fejlesztésében.
  23. Ugo D’ambrosio,Rajindra Puri (2016). Foodways in transition: food plants, diet and local perceptions of change in a Costa Rican Ngäbe community.
  24. A Da-Silva,S Ferigato (2017). Saúde mental e trabalho: diálogos sobre direito, desejo e necessidade de acesso/Mental health and work: dialogues on rights, desire, and need for access.
  25. R De-Guevara,A Prieto,L Blanco,E Roa,L Cáceres,L Vargas (2018). Características de la economía solidaria colombiana. Aproximaciones a las corrientes influyentes en Colombia.
  26. Gerd Weinrich (1992). Économie Sociale: Entre Économie Capitaliste et Économie Publique. The Third Sector: Cooperative, Mutual, and Nonprofit Organizations, Jacques Defourny and José L. Monzón Campos, Eds., De Boeck-Wesmael, Bruxelles, 1992, 459 pp., no index, 350 Ff..
  27. J Draperi (2013). Économie sociale, économie solidaire, entrepreneuriat social. Des projets politiques et économiques différents.
  28. U Eguiluz,J De Mendiguren (2019). La economía social y solidaria como vía para el buen vivir.
  29. J Faccini,A Santos,S Santos,F Jacinavicius,R Bassini-Silva,D Barros-Battesti (2017). Trombiculiasis in domestic goats and humans in the state of Maranhão, Brazil.
  30. (2019). United Nations Decade of Family Farming 2019-2028, Regional Action Plan to Implement the UNDFF and Achieve the SDGs in South Asia.
  31. Luís Ferro,Mônica Cardoso,Morgana Loureiro (2015). Economia Solidária, Saúde Mental e a prática do terapeuta ocupacional: relatos de participantes de um grupo de geração de trabalho e renda.
  32. G França-Filho (2002). Terceiro setor, economia social, economia solidária e economia popular: traçando fronteiras conceituais.
  33. G França-Filho (2006). Ação pública e economia solidária: uma perspectiva internacional.
  34. Anthony Fuller (1990). From part-time farming to pluriactivity: a decade of change in Rural Europe.
  35. Luiz Gaiger (2002). A ECONOMIA SOLIDÁRIA DIANTE DO MODO DE PRODUÇÃO CAPITALISTA.
  36. L Gaiger (2003). A Economia Solidária e a Revitalização do Paradigma Cooperativo.
  37. L Gaiger (2014). A economia solidária no Brasil: uma análise de dados nacionais.
  38. L Gaiger (2019). La lucha por el marco legal de la economía solidaria en Brasil: déficit republicano y ethos movimentalista.
  39. Luiz Gaiger,Adriane Ferrarini,Marília Veronese (2018). O Conceito de Empreendimento Econômico Solidário: Por uma Abordagem Gradualista.
  40. Luiz Gaiger,Patrícia Kuyven (2020). ECONOMIA SOLIDÁRIA E TRAJETÓRIAS DE TRABALHO Uma visão retrospectiva a partir de dados nacionais.
  41. L Gaspari,C Khatounian,P Marques (2018). The role of agriculture among pluriactive families settled around on metropolitan region: the case of the Milton Santos settlement in Americana and Cosmópolis/SP/El.
  42. Catia Grisa,Sergio Schneider (2014). Três gerações de políticas públicas para a agricultura familiar e formas de interação entre sociedade e estado no Brasil.
  43. Jutta Gutberlet,Sebastián Carenzo,Jaan-Henrik Kain,Adalberto Mantovani Martiniano De Azevedo (2017). Waste Picker Organizations and Their Contribution to the Circular Economy: Two Case Studies from a Global South Perspective.
  44. Steven Haggblade,Peter Hazell,Thomas Reardon (2010). The Rural Non-farm Economy: Prospects for Growth and Poverty Reduction.
  45. Corinna Hawkes,Bettina Brazil,Inês Castro,Patricia Jaime (2016). How to engage across sectors: lessons from agriculture and nutrition in the Brazilian School Feeding Program.
  46. Renato Hilário,José De Toledo,Karen Mustin,Isaí Castro,Salustiano Costa-Neto,Érico Kauano,Vivianne Eilers,Ivan Vasconcelos,Raimundo Mendes-Junior,Cláudia Funi,Philip Fearnside,José Silva,Ana Euler,William De Carvalho (2017). The Fate of an Amazonian Savanna: Government Land-Use Planning Endangers Sustainable Development in Amapá, the Most Protected Brazilian State.
  47. Gabriel Kraychete,Vinicius Gonçalves (2000). Economia dos setores populares: trabalho, inserção social e cidadania.
  48. J Laville (1994). L'économie solidaire: une perspective internationale.
  49. J Laville (2004). El marco conceptual de la economía solidaria.
  50. N Lechat (2004). Ensaios críticos e experimentações em direitos humanos, democracia e memória.
  51. M Manzanal,S Schneider (2011). Agricultura familiar y políticas de desarrollo rural en Argentina y Brasil (análisis comparativo, 1990-2010).
  52. V Marques (2007). Aspectos orçamentários e financeiros da reforma agrária no Brasil 2000-2005 (No. 333.3181 M357.
  53. L Mattei (2008). Pluriatividade no contexto da ruralidade contemporânea: evolução histórica dos debates sobre o tema.
  54. J Mendiguren,E Etxezarreta,L Guridi (2009). Economía Social, Empresa Social y Economía Solidaria: diferentes conceptos para un mismo debate.
  55. J Mendiguren,E Etxezarreta (2015). Sobre el concepto de economía social y solidaria: aproximaciones desde Europa y América Latina.
  56. C Milhorance,J Le Coq,E Sabourin,N Andrieu,P Mesquita,L Cavalcante,D Nogueira (2021). A policy mix approach for assessing rural household resilience to climate shocks: Insights from Northeast Brazil.
  57. J Monzón (2003). Cooperativismo y Economía Social: perspectiva histórica. CIRIEC-ESPAÑA.
  58. L Morais (2013). As políticas públicas de Economia Solidária (ESOL): avanços e limites para a inserção sociolaboral dos grupos-problema.
  59. L Morais (2014). Social and Solidarity Economy and South-South and Triangular Cooperation in Latin America and the Caribbean: Contributions to Inclusive Sustainable Development. Social and solidarity economy reader: towards inclusive and sustainable development.
  60. L Morais,M Bacic (2020). Social and Solidarity Economy and the need for its entrepreneuring ecosystem: current challenges in Brazil.
  61. Mateus Neves,Carlos Freitas,Felipe Silva,Davi Costa,Marcelo Braga (2020). Does Access to Rural Credit Help Decrease Income Inequality in Brazil?.
  62. Monika Silva (2019). Possibilidades e limites do cooperativismo pelo prisma de entidades de representação das cooperativas: uma análise comparativa entre a Organização das Cooperativas do Estado de São Paulo (OCESP) e a União e Solidariedade das Cooperativas e Empreendimentos de Economia Social do Brasil (UNISOL/Brasil)..
  63. (2020). Oxfam.
  64. (2021). O vírus da fome se multiplica: uma receita mortal misturando conflitos armados, Covid-19 e a crise climática acelera a fome no mundo.
  65. E Pardo (2020). MonedaPAR: una alternativa argentina para la economía social y solidaria.
  66. E Quicaña (2020). Efectos de la COVID-19 en la economía rural de América Latina.
  67. A Rigo,I Nascimento,P Brandão,Pai (2018). Tal Filho? Decisões coletivas tendo em conta relações familiares.
  68. Oscar Rover,Bernardo De Gennaro,Luigi Roselli (2016). Social Innovation and Sustainable Rural Development: The Case of a Brazilian Agroecology Network.
  69. J Sá (2016). Economia Social: algumas precisões.
  70. J Sá (2017). Economia Social: da crise às oportunidades.
  71. E Sabourin (2009). Unknown Title.
  72. E Sabourin (2017). Origens, evolução e institucionalização da política de agricultura familiar no Brasil.
  73. F Sacco-Dos-Anjos (2003). Agricultura Familiar, pluriatividade e desenvolvimento rural no Sul do Brasil.
  74. Marcelo Saguier,Zoe Brent (2017). Social and Solidarity Economy in South American regional governance.
  75. S Schneider (2003). Teoria social, agricultura familiar e pluriatividade.
  76. S Schneider (2009). A pluriatividade no meio rural brasileiro: características e perspectivas para investigação.
  77. Sergio Schneider,Natália Salvate,Abel Cassol (2016). Nested Markets, Food Networks, and New Pathways for Rural Development in Brazil.
  78. S Silva (2020). O Campo de Pesquisa em Economia Solidária no Brasil: histórico, abordagens metodológicas e dimensões analíticas.
  79. P Singer (1998). Globalização e desemprego: diagnóstico e alternativas.
  80. P Singer (2002). Introdução à economia solidária.
  81. Mariana Nicolletti (2000). Economia solidária e identidade: a autogestão no trabalho como experiência emancipatória.
  82. A Souza,A Fornazier,M Delgrossi (2020). Sistemas agroalimentares locais: possibilidades de novas conexões de mercados para a agricultura familiar.
  83. Arlene Souza,Maria Chaves,Reinaldo Barbosa,Charles Clement (2018). Local ecological knowledge concerning the invasion of Amerindian lands in the northern Brazilian Amazon by Acacia mangium (Willd.).
  84. (2018). Parecer A de “O Acervo digital de obras raras da Biblioteca Pública Benedito Leite: contribuições do acesso aberto para o alcance dos objetivos do desenvolvimento sustentável”.
  85. P Utting (2018). Achieving the sustainable development goals through social and solidarity economy: Incremental versus transformative change.
  86. Vivian Valencia,Hannah Wittman,Jennifer Blesh (2019). Structuring Markets for Resilient Farming Systems.
  87. L Vergara-Camus,C Kay (2017). The agrarian political economy of left-wing governments in Latin America: Agribusiness, peasants, and the limits of neo-developmentalism.
  88. M Vidal,G García (2006). Aspectos relevantes de la investigación jurídica en economía social. CIRIEC-España.
  89. Hannah Wittman,Jennifer Blesh (2017). Food Sovereignty and <i><scp>F</scp>ome <scp>Z</scp>ero</i>: Connecting Public Food Procurement Programmes to Sustainable Rural Development in <scp>B</scp>razil.

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Pedro Henrique Mariosa. 2026. \u201cSystematic Review of the Literature on Family Farming and the Social and Solidarity Economy in Brazil and Latin America\u201d. Global Journal of Human-Social Science - E: Economics GJHSS-E Volume 22 (GJHSS Volume 22 Issue E4): .

Download Citation

Detailed analysis of family farming's social and economic impacts in Brazil and Latin America.
Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJHSS

Print ISSN 0975-587X

e-ISSN 2249-460X

Keywords
Classification
GJHSS-E Classification: DDC Code: 306 LCC Code: HM281, LCC Code: KF27
Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

June 25, 2022

Language
en
Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

Article Matrices
Total Views: 1720
Total Downloads: 45
2026 Trends
Related Research

Published Article

Concerned with the increase in hunger worldwide, as well as unemployment and the lack of equity in the distribution of income, the United Nations began to address genuinely Latin American scientific categories in its agendas, assemblies and task forces. The two main categories are Family Farming, with the recent establishment of the Family Farming decade (2019-2028) and the Social and Solidarity Economy as a tool for transposing the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in the Territories. Together, these categories can be responsible for achieving the SDGs in 78% of the world’s territory. There is a need, however, to clarify whether the science produced in Latin America also presents trends of intersection, in the search for the theoretical construction of a new paradigm of production and consumption. In this sense, the objective of this study was to identify trends in scientific production on the categories Family Farming and Social and Solidarity Economy. An adaptation of the PRISMA method was developed as a systematic literature review to identify these trends in the scientific field in Latin America.

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

Quote and Order Details

Contact Person

Invoice Address

Notes or Comments

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

Systematic Review of the Literature on Family Farming and the Social and Solidarity Economy in Brazil and Latin America

Pedro Henrique Mariosa
Pedro Henrique Mariosa Universidade Federal do Amazonas
Henrique dos Santos Pereira
Henrique dos Santos Pereira

Research Journals