Loading menu…

The Distribution of Soil Microbial Parameters based on Aggregate Fractions in Successional Grassland Restoration Ecosystems on the Loess Plateau

§ Shaanxi Normal University

Send Message

To: Author

The Distribution of Soil Microbial Parameters based on Aggregate Fractions in Successional Grassland Restoration Ecosystems on the Loess Plateau

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

2YC06

The Distribution of Soil Microbial Parameters based on Aggregate Fractions in Successional Grassland Restoration Ecosystems on the Loess Plateau Banner

Key Research Insights

Synthesized scholarly intelligence & interactive research assistant
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scots Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sundanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu
Reading Preferences
Font Size
Line Spacing
Background
This converted HTML version may contain rendering inconsistencies. Please refer to the PDF for the authoritative version, or click here to provide feedback.

Abstract

Soil microbial biomass and microbial metabolic quotients have been identified as the most effective indicators of a response to ecosystem development and disturbance. In order to determine the effects of grassland restoration programs, we analyzed the distribution of soil microbial parameters in different aggregate fractions at 1yr, 10 yr. and 30 yr. Results show that C mic and P mic increased with grassland succession, the greatest values were concentrated at a micro-aggregate size. However, qCO 2 decreased as the years under restoration increased. qCO 2 was significantly correlated with SOC, TN, P mic (negatively) and C mic (positively). Natural succession of grassland alters soil microbial properties positively, which plays a major role in aggregate formation. The time under vegetation rehabilitation impacts soil microbial parameters at different aggregate sizes, especially for qCO 2 where 2-3 mm was found to be the aggregate size that was least influenced by soil quality.

I. INTRODUCTION

The Loess plateau of China is an erosionprone region that is susceptible to the forces of wind and water, and has been called the "the most highly erodible soil on Earth" (Tian and Huang, 2000). The area covers 62.38×106 hawhich includes 20.15×106 ha of grassland, with 91.2% of that area being occupied by natural grassland. Grassland is the mot common terrestrial ecosystem on Earth with a crucial function of regulating climate and maintaining a balanced ecosystem (Belsky, 1992). Widespread stress practice, intensive cultivation, overgrazing and large-scale monocultures have caused the Loess plateau to acquiesce to soil erosion and a series of related ecoenvironment problems (Montalvo et al., 1997; Fu, et al., 2000; An et al., 2009). Environmental restoration, which aims to restore disturbed ecosystems, has been an important tool for mitigating human pressure on natural environments (Holl, et al., 2003) and for improving ecological services (Doren, et al., 2009). The Grain to Green program, a national ecological restoration program implemented in 1999, has made remarkable advances in vegetation recovery on the Loess plateau (Feng, et al., 2013). Vegetation restoration is the most effective method for abating soil erosion and degradation (Hou, et al., 2002; Montalvo, et al., 1997). Several countermeasures have been implemented including eco-environment rehabilitation using engineering and biological approaches (Wang, 2002). Natural grassland protection and restoration is one of the important parts of a vegetation restoration program (Kerri, et al., 2002).

Soil structure, especially the spatial distribution of OM within the organic-mineral matrix of soil, exhibits control over microbial mediated decomposition processes in terrestrial ecosystems (Oades, 1988; Van Veen and Kuikman, 1990; Golchin, 1994; Ladd, et al., 1996). It exerts a significant amount of influence over other edaphic conditions and the surrounding environment, and often imbibes a degree of stability to aggregates (Bronick and Lal, 2005). Soil aggregates are structural units, where a group of primary soil particles cohere to each other more strongly than to other surrounding particles (Andraski and Scanlon, 2002). Research indicates that soil aggregates greatly impact the soil microbial biomass and mineral nutrients reserves (Hernández-Hernández and López-Hernández, 2002; Villar, et al., 2004). Thus, the soil microbial biomass demonstrates a similarly positive relationship with soil structure, and microbial biomass shows significantly positive relationships with aggregate size and stability (Gupta & Germida, 1988; Drury, et al., 1991; Jocteur-Monrozier, et al., 1991; Ghoshal and Singh, 1995). When assessing the effects of disturbances on soil quality, Anderson and Domsch (1985) proposed the ratio of soil basal respiration to microbial biomass (microbial metabolic quotient, specific respiration of the biomass or qCO2, conceptually based on Odum's theory of ecosystem succession, is increasingly being used as an index of ecosystem development (Odum, 1969 and 1985; Wardle & Ghani, 1995). Soil respiration is a major determinant of the carbon balance, Hunt, et al. (2004) and Wohlfahrt, et al. (2005) show that the proportionally largest emission of CO2 comes from grassland soil. Furthermore, soil microbial biomass basal respiration and microbial metabolic quotient all respond readily to disturbance effects and provide an effective early waning for the deterioration of soil quality (Powlson, et al., 1987; Wardle, 1992; Wardle & Ghani, 1995). They have been used as indicators of change in soil organic matter that occur in response to land use alteration, tillage practices and soil pollution (Sparling et al., 2003; An et al., 2009).

We hypothesize that the years under grassland restoration effects soil structure formation which consequently effects the distribution of soil microbial biomass and microbial metabolic quotient. The objectives of this study are (1) to investigate the distribution of soil microbial biomass and microbial metabolic quotient in different soil aggregate hierarchies at different restoration periods; (2) to determine the correlation between basic soil characteristics, and soil microbiological parameters; and (3) in this context, to examine soil aggregate stability.

II. MATERIALS AND METHODS

a) Study site description

The study area was located in Chinese Loess Plateau, the south of Ningxia Province (106° 25'-106° 30'E, 35° 59'-36° 20'N). The region has a sub-arid climate characterized by seasonal rainfall with periodic local flooding and drought; the average annual temperature was 6°C, and the average annual rainfall was 400-450 mm. The rainy season lasted from July to September and the rainfall in July accounting for 24% of the annual rainfall. Most of the land is at altitude of 1800-2040 m and is closely dissected by steep galleys (An et al., 2009). Grassland soils from three restoration years (30 years, natural grassland; 10 years, natural grassland; 1 year, abandoned grassland), were processed at the Yunwu Observatory for Vegetation Protection and Eco-environment.

b) Soil sampling collection

Table 1: Sampling site characteristics
Succesional YearsDominant SpeciesAccompanying speciesElevation (m)Slope gradient (°)
30Thymus mongolicusStipa bunganaStipa grandissArtemisia sacrorum.Artamisia scoparia193012
10Leymus secalinusThymus mongolicusArtemisia scopariaPotentilla bifurcaStipa bungana190811
1Artemisia scopariaPotentilla bifurcaThymus mongolicusHeteropappus altaicusThymus mongolicusStipa bungana194010

Samples were collected from 9 sites during May 2016 in each of the three restoration sites. For each restoration site (characterized by year), three samples/location were collected as replicates. An area of 50 m×50 m was selected for each of the 9 sites; within this area, three 10 m×10 m plots were selected and S-type multiple sampling methods were used for soil collection (0-20 cm). Soil sample collections were repeated 5 times in the field, mixed, transported to the laboratory and sieved (>5、5-3、3-2、2-1, 1-0.25 and <0.25 mm). Care was taken during sample preparation to minimize moisture loss and samples were divided in two. One section was preserve in 4°C for soil microbial measurements. The other was air dried for basic soil characteristics analysis. The water-holding capacity was determined by saturating each 100 cm3 turf sample with water and allowing it to drain at field capacity under cover for 48 h at ambient temperature; Duplicate soil

c) Sampling analysis

The soil samples were air dried and passed through a 2 mm sieve. The basic soil characteristics were analyzed through soil chemical and physical analyses (ISSCAS, 1981). Soil organic carbon was measured by wet digestion in a mixture of 5 ml of 0.136 mol/L potassium dichromate and 5 ml of concentrated sulfuric acid. Soil total nitrogen was measured using Kjeldahl digestion. Alkali-ExTR-N was measured using a micro-diffusion method in which NH3 was released from the soil sample by NaOH and then absorbed by boric acid. The ammonium borate product was titrated with 0.01 M HCl. Available phosphorus (Av-P) was extracted and measured in a buffered alkaline solution containing 0.5 M sodium bicarbonate. The extracts were quantified calorimetrically at 660 nm with a spectrophotometer (UV2300, Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan) (Xue et al., 2014). The readily available potassium was extracted from the soil with 1 mol/L NH4OAc and was measured using flame photometry. The soil pH was measured in water (1/2.5 w/v), and the moisture content was assessed by drying the samples in an oven at 105°C overnight.

Soil basal respiration was estimated through CO2 evolution at 25 °C in samples incubated for 10 days (Jenkinson and Powlson, 1976a). Measurements were made in the laboratory at 50% of field water holding capacity (WHC). CO2 respired was trapped in NaOH, and the residual NaOH was titrated with HCl(An et al., 2009).

The soil microbial biomass C, N and P levels were determined using the fumigation-extraction method. A 15 g sample of oven-dried, field-moist-equivalent soil (<2 mm) was fumigated with chloroform for 24 h with the chloroform being removed by repeated evacuation. The soil was reinoculated with a small amount of unfumigated soil and incubated at a constant temperature (usually 22 or 25) for 10 days at field capacity or at 50% of its water-holding capacity (approximately -0.01 MPa). An additional, unfumigated soil sample was used as a control (Jenkinson, 1976; Jenkinson and Powlson, 1976b; Xue et al., 2014). The soil microbial biomass carbon level was determined immediately using a TOC analyzer or the sample was preserved at -18 (Phoenix 8000, Tekmar Dohrmann, Mason, OH, U.S.A.). A kc value of 0.4 was chosen to calculate the total soil microbial biomass C (Wu et al., 1990). To determine soil microbial biomass N, fumigated and unfumigated samples were extracted via potassium persulfate oxidation and then measured using ultraviolet spectroscopy. The extract liquor was digested with alkaline auto-oxidation using 0.15 mol/L NaOH and 30 g/L K2S2O8 with a 1:1 v/v mixture of oxidant and soil at 120-124 for 30 min (Zhou and Li, 1998; Xue et al., 2014). The concentration of N was determined colorimetrically using a spectrophotometer (UV2300, Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan) at 220 and 275 nm. A kN value of 0.54 was chosen to calculate the total soil microbial biomass N (Vance et al., 1987). The soil microbial P level was determined calorimetrically with a spectrophotometer. 2.5 g of fumigated and unfumigated soil was placed into a 150-ml flask containing 50 ml of 0.5 mol/L NaHCO3 solution and 2 g of P-free active charcoal. 5 ml of Mo-Sb spectrochrometry solution was added for color development. After 30 minutes, the color was determined with a spectrophotometer (UV2300, Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan) at 700 nm. The microbial P was calculated using a kp factor of 0.40 (Hedley and Stewart, 1982; An et al., 2012).

III. RESULTS

a) Basic soil characteristics

Table 2: Basic soil characteristics
Soil CharacteristicsSuccesional years
30 years10 years1year
BD0.911.131.28
MFC37.0831.8327.34
Por.54.8554.8050.36
SOC27.8518.159.50
TN3.101.881.17
Ap-P3.563.372.71
Ap-K166.24241.69153.04
NH4+−N14.084.214.53
NO3−−N16.626.4015.06
C: N8.878.268.26
Inv.20.4014.777.83
Alk.-P12.439.995.95
Ure.2.624.133.64
Cmic1065.49683.72358.96
Nmic25.7841.4117.23
Pmic19.9915.742.56

General soil characteristics for the various restoration years are shown in Table 2. As grassland recovery years increased, maximum field capacity (MFC), porosity (Por.), soil organic carbon (SOC), total nitrogen (TN), rapid available phosphorus (Ap-P), invertase (Inv), Alkal-phosphatase (Alk.-P), soil microbial biomass carbon ( Cmic ) and phosphorus ( Pmic ) also increased. However, restoration years also resulted in a decrease in bulk density (BD). The highest concentrations of soil microbial biomass nitrogen ( Nmic ), urease (Ure) and rapid available potassium (Ap-K) were found in 10 year grassland. The distribution of aggregate size class percentage varied among the grassland restoration sites (Fig. 1). The percentage of < 0.25 and > 5 mm aggregate sizes in 30 year natural grassland was lower than in 10 year. Lastly, soil aggregate composition in 30 year grassland was mainly concentrated between 0.25 and 5 mm.

Fig. 1: Effect of restoration years on the distributions of aggregate sizes' percentage
Fig. 1: Effect of restoration years on the distributions of aggregate sizes' percentage

b) Distribution of SOC and TN in various aggregate sizes

The concentration of SOC and TN associated with soil grain size increased with the number of years of grassland succession (Fig. 2 (a) and (c)). For 10- and 30-year natural grassland, the percentage of SOC in 1-2, 2-3 and 3-5 mm was higher than for other aggregate sizes. In 1 year abandoned grassland, the macro-aggregate size (>5 mm) showed the greatest SOC with rapid enhancement between 3-5 and 5 mm (Fig. 2 (b)). The trend in distribution of TN among the various aggregate classes in 10- and 30-year natural grassland was similar (i.e., stable between 15.79 - 17.64). However, significant changes occurred in 1year-abandoned grassland (Fig. 2 (d)). The percentage of TN (11.26) was lowest for micro-aggregates (<0.25 mm), highest in 0.25-1 mm (19.22), and remained at a lower yet steady level for 10- and 30-year (17.02-18.51).

(d) (a) The distribution of SOC in different vegetation restoration years; (b) The percent distribution of SOC in soil aggregate size (c) The distribution of TN in different vegetation restoration years; (d) The percent distribution of TN in soil aggregate size

Fig. 2: Effect of restoration years on SOC and TN for different aggregate sizes

c) The distribution of soil microbial parameters at different aggregate sizes

i. Soil microbial biomass

The concentrations of Cmic, and Pmic at different grain sizes increases with length of grassland succession (Fig. 3 (a) and (e)). The situation with Nmic is different where it had the highest value in a 10 year natural grassland (Fig. 3 (c)).

Under a 30 year natural grassland, the percentage of Cmic (18.59) was greatest for a micro-aggregate size of <0.25 mm, as aggregate size increased, percentages dropped to a stable range between 15.68-16.56. At 10 years, a grain size of 1-2 mm showed the greatest percentage of Cmic (18.4), which was a rapid increase from <0.25. The percentage of Cmic for other particle sizes remained at a stable level between 16.72-17.61 (Fig 3 (b)). The curve of Cmic versus aggregate size for a recently abandoned grassland fluctuated greatly. There was a significant decrease in percentage of Cmic in 2-3 mm versus 1-2, 3-5 and >5 mm. In a 30-year natural grassland, the percentage of Nmic remained stable between 14.99 and 18.48 for the various aggregate sizes. As soil aggregate size increased, the distribution of Nmic in 1- and 10-year grassland showed a rising tendency and declining trend, respectively (Fig 3 (d)). The percentage of Pmic in different aggregate sizes for 10- and 30-year natural grassland remained stable. Whereas, for the highest percentage occurring in aggregate sizes of 2-3 mm, the 1-year curve showed a "normal distribution" which was significantly enhanced from 0.25-1 mm and rapidly declined at 2-3 mm (Fig 3 (f)).

(f) (a) The distribution of Cmic in different grassland restoration years; (b) The percentage distribution of Cmic in soil aggregate size (c) The distribution of Nmic in different grassland restoration years; (d) The percentage distribution of Nmic in soil aggregate size (e) The distribution of Pmic in different grassland restoration years; (f) The percentage distribution of Pmic in soil aggregate sizes

Fig. 3: Effect of restoration years on Cmic, Nmic and Pmic in different aggregate sizes

d) Soil microbial basal respiration and metabolic quotient

Soil microbial basal respiration (SBR) was enhanced as the successional years increased (Fig.4(a)). For a grassland abandoned for 1 year, the percentage of SBR in <0.25 and 0.25-1 mm was lower than in other aggregate sizes. SBR increased with aggregate size, the highest occurring between 3-5 mm. The curve of SBR for a 30-year natural grassland for different aggregate size classes fluctuated, it was the highest in 3-5 mm and lowest in 2-3 mm. However, the percentage at 10 years increased with soil aggregate size (Fig.4 (b)). Soil microbial metabolic quotient ( qCO2 ) among the aggregate size classes had the opposite reaction as restoration years increased (Fig.4 (c)). In a grassland abandoned for 10 years, the percentage of qCO2, in aggregate size classes of 0.25-1, 1-2 and 2-3 mm, was lower than in the micro-aggregate (<0.25 mm) and macro-aggregate (3-5 mm and >5 mm) classes (Fig.4 (d)).

(b) (a) The distribution of SBR for different grassland restoration years;

(b) The percent distribution of SBR in soil aggregate sizes (c) The distribution of qCO2 for different grassland restoration years;

(d) The percent distribution of qCO2 in soil aggregate sizes

Fig. 4: Effect of restoration years on SBR and qCO2 in different aggregate sizes e) The ratios of C/N, Cmic/Nmic and Cmic/Pmic Table 3: The ratios of C/N, Cmic/Nmic and Cmic/Pmic for different aggregate sizes

Succesional yearsSize classes (mm)C/NCmic/PmicCmic/Nmic
30<0.258.4267.3844.92
0.25--18.6756.0537.03
1--29.5149.8944.57
2--39.3552.9837.37
3--59.3241.9343.24
>58.5256.0142.02
Mean8.9754.0441.53
10<0.258.9536.0910.30
0.25--18.6743.1114.08
1--210.1244.1315.91
2--310.0845.2517.41
3--59.8146.8721.02
>510.2344.5327.04
Mean9.6443.3317.62
1<0.2510.40206.0146.49
0.25--16.85218.8720.67
1--27.56119.2225.96
2--38.2964.2119.32
3--57.19170.7520.10
>59.28290.9513.58
Mean8.26178.3424.35

The ratios of C/N, Cmic/Nmic and Cmic/Pmic for the different aggregate sizes in the three successional periods were shown in Table 3. The greatest ratios of C/N, Cmic/Nmic and Cmic/Pmic were exhibited in the 10 year, 30 year and 1 year grasslands, respectively.

For the 10- and 30-year natural successional grasslands, the ratios of C/N in aggregate size of 1-2, 2-3 and 3-5 mm were higher than the others. The ratios of Cmic/Pmic in grassland under succession for 30 years was greater in <0.25, 0.25-1 and >5 mm and were between 43.11-46.25 in grassland under succession for 10 years, expect <0.25 mm which had the lowest value. For a grassland under restoration for one year, the ratios show a V shaped distribution among the soil aggregate sizes, with the lowest ratio occurring in 2-3 mm. The ratio of Cmic/Nmic in grassland that was in a natural state for 30 years was maintained at a stable level (37.03-42.02), but, at 10 years, the ratio increased as soil aggregate size increased. For a grassland mm and lowest for >5mm, the other ratios were abandoned for 1 year, the ratio was greatest for <0.25 between 9.32 - 25.96.

f) The

Table 4: Correlation coefficients between basic characteristics and soil microbial parameters
SOCTotal NNO3-NNH4-NAp-KAp-PC/N
Cmic0.965**0.964**0.155-0.2690.0870.574*0.259
Nmic0.2680.206-0.704**-0.1060.0460.0350.312
Pmic0.933**0.883**-0.106-0.2080.4060.677**0.422
SBR0.910**0.882**0.046-0.0980.2070.672**0.326
qCO2-0.932**-0.906**0.0350.395-0.267-0.473**-0.463

Significant correlations were found between soil microbial properties and chemical characteristics. As Table 4 shows, a correlation exists among the soil microbial properties that were significantly correlated with SOC, TN and Ap-P. Nmic did not relate to SBR and qCO2, and only correlated with NO3−−N.Cmic and Pmic were significantly correlated with SBR, qCO2 and Cmic/Nmic, (p<0.01). The ratio of Cmic/Pmic was negatively correlated with Cmic (R=-0.638, p<0.01), Nmic (R=-507, p<0.05), Pmic (R=-0.833, p<0.01) and SBR (R=-0.727, p<0.01), and positively correlated with qCO2 (R=0.635, p<0.01).

Table 5: Correlation coefficients for soil microbial biomass and respiration \begin{table}[htbp] \centering \begin{tabular}{lccccccc} & Cmic & Nmic & Pmic & SBR & qCO2 & Cmic/Nmic & Cmic/Pmic \ \hline Cmic & 1 & & & & & & \ Nmic & 0.250 & 1 & & & & & \ Pmic & 0.903 & 0.486 & 1 & & & & \SBR & 0.917 & 0.305 & 0.933 & 1 & & & \ qCO2 & 0.954 & -0.414 & -0.901 & 0.841** & 1 & & \ Cmic/Nmic & 0.593 & 0.548 & 0.369 & 0.472* & -0.463 & 1 & \ Cmic/Pmic & -0.638** & -0.507* & -0.833 & -0.727 & 0.635** & 0.142 & 1 \ \end{tabular} \caption{Correlation coefficients for soil microbial biomass and respiration.} \end{table}
CmicNmicPmicSBRqCO2Cmic/NmicCmic/Pmic
Cmic1
Nmic0.2501
Pmic0.903**0.486**1
SBR0.917**0.3050.933**1
qCO20.954**-0.414-0.901**0.841**1
Cmic/Nmic0.593**0.548**0.3690.472*-0.4631
Cmic/Pmic-0.638**-0.507*-0.833**-0.727**0.635**0.1421

Table 5 shows that soil microbial metabolic quotient ( qCO2 ) was positively related to Cmic (R=0.954) and negatively correlated to Pmic (R=-0.901), the correlation ratios were significant (p<0.01). The correlation between Cmic and qCO2, Pmic and qCO2 in different aggregate sizes is shown in Figures 5 and 6. The correlation coefficients for Cmic and qCO2, Pmic and qCO2 in <0.25, 0.25-1, 1-2 and >5 mm were higher (0.9177-0.9804, 0.8288-0.989) than in 2-3 (0.7427, 0.7679) and 3-5mm (Fig.5 (d) and (f)).

Fig. 5: The relationship between Cmic and qCO2 among different aggregate sizes
Fig. 5: The relationship between Cmic and qCO2 among different aggregate sizes

(f) >5 mm Fig. 6: The relationship between Pmic and qCO 2 among different aggregate sizes

IV. DISCUSSION

Soil microbial parameters are indicators of soil quality and can be used to evaluate the success of revegetation in disturbed soil ecosystems (An, et al., 2009). Soil microbial biomass, basal respiration and metabolic quotient have been previously considered the most sensitive parameters for evaluating natural and degraded systems (Chen, et al., 2000; Dick et al., 1996; Bolinder et al., 1999; An et al., 2009). The microbial parameters measured in this study were measured at different aggregate sizes, and used to quantify soil quality differences under different successional stages or lengths of revegetation. In the present study, SOC, TN and Ap-P (chemical characteristics); Inv., Alk-P (soil enzyme activities); Cmic and Pmic (soil microbial biomass) increased with an increase in restoration years. Natural grassland flourished when grazing was prohibited. After the grassland was protected with fences, plant biomass and height increased, with a concommittal increase in soil organic matter.

The arrangement of the soil aggregates and their stability had a large influence on soil properties (Lynch and Bragg, 1985). The composition of the soil aggregates influenced the amount of soil organic matter, which in return affected the soil aggregate structure and stability by functioning as a bonding agent between mineral soil particles (Haynes and Beare, 1997; Chevallier, et al., 2004; Diaz, et al., 1994). Soil organic matter protects the soil surface against raindrop impact, improves water infiltration and impacts the hydrophobic characteristics that reduce wetting rates and slaking (Angers, et al., 1998). In 10- and 30-year natural grassland, the amount of Cmic was greatest in <0.25 mm, then <0.25 and lastly 1−2 mm, respectively. In grassland that was abandoned for 1 year, the amount of Cmic was greatest in in 1-2, then 3-5 and, lastly >5 mm. Micro-aggregate size impacted Cmic accumulation, the effect of accumulation increased as the restoration years increased.

Soil microbial biomass contributed, with a significant portion in the active pools of SOC and TN. Soil microbial biomass C is one of the comprehensive indicators which reflect soil nutrient availability, biological activity and distribution of microorganism (An et al., 2009). It is the dynamic part of the soil carbon pool, which indicates the condition of soil organic matter accumulation (He, et al. 1997; Insam and Domsch, 1998). The soil microbial community influences soil mineralization and immobilization processes. The vegetative species and composition change as the vegetation restoration years increase, which impacts the soil microbial community in a direct way. An extensive root system provides the most improvement in soil structure by binding macro-aggregates to fine roots and VAM fungal hyphae and by binding micro-aggregates with adhesive bacterial metabolic products. (Lynch and Bragg, 1985; Carter, 1986; Perfect et al., 1990). Carbon input is the limiting factor in production of soil microbial biomass (Lynch and Panting, 1980; Insam & Haselwandter, 1989). The natural grassland with 30 years of restoration has a species-rich plant community that protects soil from physical disturbance (Pérès, et al., 2013), and higher soil organic matter supports an abundant carbon source for the growth of microorganisms and metabolism (Six, et al., 1999 and 2000a; Anderson and Gray, 1990), which results in the highest amounts of Cmic and Pmic. The percentage of Cmic at different aggregate sizes was stable (Six, et al., 2000b).

Anderson and Domsch (1985) proposed that the ratio of soil basal respiration to microbial biomass (soil microbial metabolic quotient or qCO2 ), was the most sensitive indicator of quantitative and qualitative changes in microbial communities caused by various management systems (Insam et al., 1989). It was identified as the most important parameter in analyzing vegetation and soil microbial characteristics (Bastida et al., 2008; An et al., 2009). Soil respiration relies on a suite of complex processes contributing to CO2 efflux from soil surface, mainly from plant roots and micro-organisms (Jia, et al., 2006; An et al., 2009). Many studies showed the changes in soil respiration and soil microbiological properties with succession (Schafer, et al., 1979; Mathes and Schriefer, 1985; Stroo and Jencks, 1982; Insam & Hasel wandter, 1989). In this study, soil basal respiration was enhanced as natural restoration years increased with the highest concentrations found at the macro-aggregate level. The findings of Insam and Haselwandtere (1989) on two 50-year-old soil chronosequences on reclamation sites are similar. However, soil microbial metabolic quotient ( qCO2 ) declined as vegetation restoration years increased. The percentage of qCO2 in micro-aggregate sizes was lower than in macro-aggregate sizes, the distributions of SOC and TN in different aggregate sizes was similar. Because qCO2 was negatively correlated with SOC and total N, the decrease in qCO2 with time for the vegetated areas at different aggregate sizes resulted in competition for the available carbon source, which seemed to favor aggregate classes that needed the least amount of energy for maintenance and growth (Insam and Haselwandter, 1989). In the current study, relationships existed between qCO2 and SOC, TN, Ap-P, Cmic, Pmic and SBR. Especially for Cmic and Pmic, the ratios in 2-3 mm were lowest (0.7472 and 0.7679, respectively). Wardle (1992) indicated that a lower microbial biomass concentration can be characteristic of disturbance, and it is an obvious factor that induces a rise in qCO2. A higher qCO2 and a lower microbial biomass may both occur late in ecosystem succession, and the relationship between the two reflects their dual response to underlying stress (Wardle & Ghani, 1995). The result demonstrates that 2-3 mm is the relative stable aggregate size class in ecosystem succession.

V. CONCLUSION

Loess plateau ecosystems are suffering serious environmental problems including natural grassland degradation due to soil and water erosion. This study shows that grassland has a positive effect on soil status as indicated by an increase in the concentration of soil nutrients and microbial biomass. As grassland restoration years increased, soil microbial biomass carbon, phosphorus and basal respiration increased. Soil microbial metabolic quotient ( qCO2 ) an alternative measure that changes when microbial biomass responses to disturbances, is significantly correlated to Cmic and Pmic, the lowest ratios illustrated that 2-3 mm was the stablest aggregate size in the process of ecological restoration.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This study was supported by Key Laboratory Open Project Fund (A314021402-1707), the National Natural Sciences Foundation of China (41571260, 41807060), and National Special Research and Development Project during the Thirty Five-year Plan Period (2017YFC0504702).

References

67 Cites in Article
  1. 1. V Unknown Title.
  2. 2. Shao-Shan An,Yi-Mei Huang,Fen-Li Zheng (2009). Evaluation of soil microbial indices along a revegetation chronosequence in grassland soils on the Loess Plateau, Northwest China. Applied Soil Ecology, 41(3), 286-292.
  3. 3. Shao‐shan An,Yi Cheng,Yi‐mei Huang,Dong Liu (2013). Effects of Revegetation on Soil Microbial Biomass, Enzyme Activities, and Nutrient Cycling on the Loess Plateau in China. Restoration Ecology, 21(5), 600-607.
  4. 4. T-H Anderson,K Domsch (1985). Determination of ecophysiological maintenance carbon requirements of soil microorganisms in a dormant state. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 1(2), 81-89.
  5. 5. T Anderson,T Gray (1990). Soil microbial carbon uptake characteristics in relation to soil management. FEMS microbiology Ecology, 74, 11-20.
  6. 6. Brian Andraski,Bridget Scanlon (2002). 3.2.3 Thermocouple Psychrometry. 3.2.3 Thermocouple Psychrometry, 609-642.
  7. 7. Denis Angers,Jean Caron (1998). Plant-induced changes in soil structure: Processes and feedbacks. Plant-induced soil changes: Processes and feedbacks, 55-72.
  8. 8. F Bastida,A Zsolnay,T Hernández,C García (2008). Past, present and future of soil quality indices: A biological perspective. Geoderma, 147(3-4), 159-171.
  9. 9. A Belsky (1992). Effects of grazing, competition, disturbance and fire on species composition and diversity in grassland communities. Journal of Vegetation Science, 3(2), 187-200.
  10. 10. M Bolinder,D Angers,E Gregorich,M Carter (1999). The response of soil quality indicators to conservation management. Canadian Journal of Soil Science, 79(1), 37-45.
  11. 11. C Bronick,R Lal (2005). Soil structure and management: a review. Geoderma, 124(1), 3-22.
  12. 12. M Carter (1986). Microbial biomass as an index for tillage-induced changes in soil biological properties. Soil and Tillage Research, 7(1), 29-40.
  13. 13. C Chen,L Condron,M Davis,R Sherlock (2000). Effects of afforestation on phosphorus dynamics and biological properties in a New Zealand grassland soil. Plant and Soil, 220(1-2), 151-163.
  14. 14. G Chen,Z He,C Huang (2000). Relationships between microbial biomass and polls and plant-availability in red soils. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 39, 152-160.
  15. 15. T Chevallier,E Blanchart,A Albrecht,C Feller (2004). The physical protection of soil organic carbon in aggregates: a mechanism of carbon storage in a Vertisol under pasture and market gardening (Martinique, West Indies). Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 103(2), 375-387.
  16. 16. M Diazravina,M Acea,T Carballas (1995). Seasonal changes in microbial biomass and nutrient flush in forest soils. Bio. Fert. Soils, 19, 220-226.
  17. 17. R Dick,V Gupta,C Pankhurst,Doube (1994). A conceptual model for the role of abiontic soil enzymes in microbial ecology: a potential analogue for soil quality. Soil biota: management in sustainable farming systems, 167-168.
  18. 18. Robert Doren,Joel Trexler,Andrew Gottlieb,Matthew Harwell (2009). Ecological indicators for system-wide assessment of the greater everglades ecosystem restoration program. Ecological Indicators, 9(6), S2-S16.
  19. 19. C Drury,J Stone,W Findlay (1991). Microbial Biomass and Soil Structure Associated with Corn, Grasses, and Legumes. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 55(3), 805-811.
  20. 20. A Edwards,J Bremner (1967). MICROAGGREGATES IN SOILS1. Journal of Soil Science, 18(1), 64-73.
  21. 21. Xiaoming Feng,Bojie Fu,Nan Lu,Yuan Zeng,Bingfang Wu (2013). How ecological restoration alters ecosystem services: an analysis of carbon sequestration in China's Loess Plateau. Scientific Reports, 3(1), 1-5.
  22. 22. Bojie Fu,Liding Chen,Keming Ma,Huafeng Zhou,Jun Wang (2000). The relationships between land use and soil conditions in the hilly area of the loess plateau in northern Shaanxi, China. CATENA, 39(1), 69-78.
  23. 23. N Ghoshal,K Singh (1995). Effects of farmyard manure and inorganic fertilizer on the dynamics of soil microbial biomass in a tropical dryland agroecosystem. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 19(2-3), 231-238.
  24. 24. A Golchin,J Oades,J Skjemstad,P Clarke (1994). Soil structure and carbon cycling. Soil Research, 32(5), 1043-1068.
  25. 25. V Gupta,J Germida (1988). Distribution of microbial biomass and its activity in different soil aggregate size classes as affected by cultivation. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 20(6), 777-786.
  26. 26. R Haynes,M Beare (1997). Influence of six crop species on aggregate stability and some labile organic matter fractions. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 29(11-12), 1647-1653.
  27. 27. Z He (1997). Turnover of soil microbial biomass and its relation to nutrient cycling in agricultural production system: A review. Tura, 29, 61-69.
  28. 28. M Hedley,J Stewart (1982). Method to measure microbial phosphate in soils. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 14(4), 377-385.
  29. 29. R Hernández-Hernández,D López-Hernández (2002). Microbial biomass, mineral nitrogen and carbon content in savanna soil aggregates under conventional and no-tillage. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 34(11), 1563-1570.
  30. 30. K Holl,E Crone,C Schultz (2003). Landscape restoration: moving from generalities to methodologies. BioScience, 53(5), 491-502.
  31. 31. F Hou,J Xiao,Z Nan (2002). Eco-restoration of abandoned farmland in the Loess Plateau]. Ying yong sheng tai xue bao= The journal of applied ecology/Zhongguo sheng tai xue xue hui. Zhongguo ke xue yuan Shenyang ying yong sheng tai yan jiu suo zhu ban, 13(8), 923-929.
  32. 32. John Hunt,Francis Kelliher,Tony Mcseveny,Des Ross,David Whitehead (2004). Long‐term carbon exchange in a sparse, seasonally dry tussock grassland. Global Change Biology, 10(10), 1785-1800.
  33. 33. H Insam,K Domsch (1988). Relationship between soil organic carbon and microbial biomass on chronosequences of reclamation sites. Microbial Ecology, 15(2), 177-188.
  34. 34. H Insam,K Haselwandter (1989). Metabolic quotient of the soil microflora in relation to plant succession. Oecologia, 79(2), 174-178.
  35. 35. H Insam,K Haselwandter (1989). Metabolic quotient of the soil microflora in relation to plant succession. Oecologia, 79(2), 174-178.
  36. 36. (1981). Soil chemical and physical analysis. Soil chemical and physical analysis
  37. 37. D Jenkinson (1976). The effects of biocidal treatments on metabolism in soil—IV. The decomposition of fumigated organisms in soil. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 8(3), 203-208.
  38. 38. D Jenkinson,D Powlsoj (1976). The effects of biocidal treatment on metabolism in soil. I. Fumigation with chloroform. Soil Biol. Biochem, 8, 167-177.
  39. 39. B Jia,G Zhou,Y Wang,F Wang,X Wang (2006). Effects of temperature and soil water-content on soil respiration of grazed and ungrazed Leymus chinensis steppes, Inner Mongolia. Journal of Arid Environments, 67(1), 60-76.
  40. 40. L Jocteur Monrozier,J Ladd,R Fitzpatrick,R Foster,M Rapauch (1991). Components and microbial biomass content of size fractions in soils of contrasting aggregation. Geoderma, 50(1), 37-62.
  41. 41. L Kerri,E Louise,J Francisco,R Mark,M Kate (2002). Soil microbial community composition and land use history in cultivated and grassland ecosystems of coastal California. Soil Biol. Biochem, 34, 1599-1611.
  42. 42. J Ladd,R Foster,P Nannipieri,J Oades (1996). Soil structure and biological activity. Soil Biochemistry, 9, 23-78.
  43. 43. J Lynch,Elaine Bragg (1985). Microorganisms and Soil Aggregate Stability. Advances in Soil Science, 133-171.
  44. 44. J Lynch,Lynda Panting (1980). Variations in the size of the soil biomass. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 12(6), 547-550.
  45. 45. K Mathes,T Schriefer (1985). Soil respiration during secondary succession: Influence of temperature and moisture. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 17(2), 205-211.
  46. 46. Arlee Montalvo,Susan Williams,Kevin Rice,Stephen Buchmann,Coleen Cory,Steven Handel,Gary Nabhan,Richard Primack,Robert Robichaux (1997). Restoration Biology: A Population Biology Perspective. Restoration Ecology, 5(4), 277-290.
  47. 47. J Oades (1988). The retention of organic matter in soils. Biogeochemistry, 5(1), 35-70.
  48. 48. E Odum (1969). The strategy of ecosystem development. Sustainability: Sustainability, 164, 58.
  49. 49. G Pérès,D Cluzeau,S Menasseri,J Soussana,H Bessler,C Engels,M Habekost,G Gleixner,A Weigelt,W Weisser,S Scheu,N Eisenhauer (2013). Mechanisms linking plant community properties to soil aggregate stability in an experimental grassland plant diversity gradient. Plant and Soil, 373(1-2), 285-299.
  50. 50. E Perfect,B Kay,W Van Loon,R Sheard,T Pojasok (1990). Factors Influencing Soil Structural Stability within a Growing Season. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 54(1), 173-179.
  51. 51. D Powlson,P Brooker,B Christensen (1987). Measurement of soil microbial biomass provides an early indication of changes in total soil organic matter due to straw incorporation. Soil Biol. Biochem, 19, 159-164.
  52. 52. J Six,E Elliott,K Paustian (2000). Soil macroaggregate turnover and microaggregate formation: a mechanism for C sequestration under no-tillage agriculture. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 32(14), 2099-2103.
  53. 53. J Six,E Elliott,K Paustian (1999). Aggregate and Soil Organic Matter Dynamics under Conventional and No‐Tillage Systems. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 63(5), 1350-1358.
  54. 54. J Six,E Elliott,K Paustian (2000). Soil Structure and Soil Organic Matter II. A Normalized Stability Index and the Effect of Mineralogy. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 64(3), 1042-1049.
  55. 55. G Sparling,P Hart,J August,D Leslie (1994). A comparison of soil and microbial carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus contents, and macro-aggregate stability of a soil under native forest and after clearance for pastures and plantation forest. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 17(2), 91-100.
  56. 56. H Stroo,E Jencks (1982). Enzyme Activity and Respiration in Minesoils. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 46(3), 548-553.
  57. 57. (2000). Soil erosion an d dryland farming. Soil erosion an d dryland farming, 736.
  58. 58. Protection Us,Agency,Office,Research,Development,W Schafer,G Nielson,D Dollhop (1979). Soil genesis, hydrological properties, root characteristics and microbial activity of 1-to 50-year-old stripmine spoils. Soil genesis, hydrological properties, root characteristics and microbial activity of 1-to 50-year-old stripmine spoils
  59. 59. J Van Veen,P Kuikman (1990). Soil structural aspects of decomposition of organic matter by micro-organisms. Biogeochemistry, 11(3), 213-233.
  60. 60. E Vance,P Brookes,D Jenkinson (1987). An extraction method for measuring soil microbial biomass C. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 19(6), 703-707.
  61. 61. M Villar,V Petrikova,M Dı́az-Raviña,T Carballas (2004). Changes in soil microbial biomass and aggregate stability following burning and soil rehabilitation. Geoderma, 122(1), 73-82.
  62. 62. G Wang (2002). Plant traits and soil chemical variables during a secondary succession on the Loess P1atean. Acta Bot. Sin, 44(8), 990-998.
  63. 63. D Wardle,A Ghani (1995). A critique of the microbial metabolic quotient (qCO 2 ) as a bioindicator of disturbance and ecosystem development. Soil Biol. Biochem, 27(12), 1601-1610.
  64. 64. D Wardle (1992). A COMPARATIVE ASSESSMENT OF FACTORS WHICH INFLUENCE MICROBIAL BIOMASS CARBON AND NITROGEN LEVELS IN SOIL. Biological Reviews, 67(3), 321-358.
  65. 65. Georg Wohlfahrt,Christian Anfang,Michael Bahn,Alois Haslwanter,Christian Newesely,Michael Schmitt,Matthias Drösler,Jörg Pfadenhauer,Alexander Cernusca (2005). Quantifying nighttime ecosystem respiration of a meadow using eddy covariance, chambers and modelling. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 128(3-4), 141-162.
  66. 66. J Wu,R Joergensen,Birgit Pommerening,R Chaussod,P Brookes (1990). Measurement of soil microbial biomass C by fumigation-extraction—an automated procedure. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 22(8), 1167-1169.
  67. 67. Zhijing Xue,Shaoshan An,Man Cheng,Wanzhong Wang (2014). Plant functional traits and soil microbial biomass in different vegetation zones on the Loess Plateau. Journal of Plant Interactions, 9(1), 889-900.

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Zhijing Xue, Zhongming Wen, Zhengchao Zhou, Shaoshan An. 2019. "The Distribution of Soil Microbial Parameters based on Aggregate Fractions in Successional Grassland Restoration Ecosystems on the Loess Plateau". Global Journal of Science Frontier Research - H: Environment & Environmental geology GJSFR-H Volume 19 (GJSFR Volume 19 Issue H2).

More Citation Formats

Download Citation

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJSFR

Print ISSN 0975-5896

e-ISSN 2249-4626

Keywords
Classification
GJSFR-H Classification FOR Code: 050399
Version of record
v1.2

Issue date
July 23, 2019

Language
English
Order Article Reprint
Experience in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

Article Matrices
Total Views: 955
Total Downloads: 40
All Trends

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

The Distribution of Soil Microbial Parameters based on Aggregate Fractions in Successional Grassland Restoration Ecosystems on the Loess Plateau

Zhijing Xue
Zhijing Xue Shaanxi Normal University
Zhongming Wen
Zhongming Wen
Zhengchao Zhou
Zhengchao Zhou
Shaoshan An
Shaoshan An