The Measurements of Directional Dependence of Weight for Magnets

1
C. Y. Lo
C. Y. Lo
2
Li Hua Wang
Li Hua Wang

Send Message

To: Author

GJSFR Volume 18 Issue A11

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

SFR832SC

The Measurements of Directional Dependence of Weight for Magnets Banner

AI TAKEAWAY

The objective of our study was to evaluate, in a population of Togolese People Living With HIV(PLWHIV), the agreement between three scores derived from the general population namely the Framingham score, the Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation (SCORE), the evaluation of the cardiovascular risk (CVR) according to the World Health Organization.
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scots Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sundanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu

To explain the weight reduction of a charged capacitor and Einstein’s unification, it is necessary to confirm the existence of the repulsive charge-mass interaction and the attractive current-mass interaction. Therefore, to show the existence of the current-mass interaction, one must measure the effect of a small directional dependence of weight for a magnet, To do this, one must exclude the magnetic effect from the earth. In addition, one should avoid the influence of the magnet to the electronic scale for weighing. Here, we provide a method to measure and confirm such tiny effects of weight directional dependence experimentally. However, it is not effective to measure the small current-mass interaction directly. A problem is that a current must have a maintaining source unless in the super-conducting situation. Thus, this connection to the source would affect the measurements of the small current-mass interaction. Moreover, E = mc 2 is not always valid and Einstein failed his unification because, unlike Maxwell, he did not recognize that some additional interactions must be added to the original theories.

Article content is being processed or not available yet.

61 Cites in Articles

References

  1. C Lo (2012). Unknown Title.
  2. C Lo (2012). The invalid speculation of , the Reissner–Nordström metric, and Einstein's Unification Theory.
  3. C Lo (2012). On the Weight Reduction of Metals due to Temperature Increments.
  4. C Lo (2016). The observable temperature dependence of gravitation.
  5. C Lo (2017). The observable temperature dependence of gravitation.
  6. T Valone (2008). Electro Gravitics II.
  7. P La,Violette (2008). Secrets of Antigravity Propulsion.
  8. Takaaki Musha (2008). Instability of Space-time Continuum from the Standpoint of ZPF Field in a Vacuum.
  9. Takaaki Musha Theoretical explanation of the Biefeld-Brown Effect.
  10. Takaaki Musha (2024). Special value of the odd zeta function ζ(3).
  11. C Misner,K Thorne,J Wheeler (1973). Gravitation.
  12. C Lo (1997). Comments on Misunderstandings of Relativity and the Theoretical Interpretation of the Kreuzer Experiment.
  13. C Lo (1995). Einstein's Radiation Formula and Modifications to the Einstein Equation.
  14. S Editor Chandrasekhar suggests and approves the appendix therein.
  15. C Lo (1999). Compatibility with Einstein's Notion of Weak Gravity: Einstein's Equivalence Principle and the Absence of Dynamic Solutions for the 1915 Einstein Equation.
  16. C Lo (2000). On the Incompatibility of Gravitational Radiation with the 1915 Einstein Equation.
  17. V Gladyshev,A Tereshin,D Bazleva,T Gladysheva (2005). Electromagnetic radiation in the medium with a velocity gradient.
  18. A Einstein,W Pauli (1943). On the Non-Existence of Regular Stationary Solutions of Relativistic Field Equations.
  19. H Einstein,H Lorentz,H Minkowski,Weyl (1923). The Principle of Relativity.
  20. C Lo,G Goldstein,A Napier (1989). Radiation reaction force and unification of electromagnetic and gravitational fields.
  21. Th,Kaluza (1921). On The Unity Problem of Physics, Sitzungsberichte der K.
  22. A Einstein,W Pauli (1943). On the Non-Existence of Regular Stationary Solutions of Relativistic Field Equations.
  23. C Lo (2007). The Necessity of Unifying Gravitation and Electromagnetism, Mass-Charge Repulsive Effects, and the Five Dimensional Theory.
  24. K Thorne (1994). Black Holes and Time Warps.
  25. C Lo (2015). The Weight Reduction of Charged Capacitors, Charge-Mass Interaction, and Einstein's Unification.
  26. W Liu (2007). Virtual Private Network (VPN).
  27. C Lo,C Wong (2006). Unknown Title.
  28. Einstein (1946). E = mc 2 ' (from Science Illustrated.
  29. C Lo (2014). On Achievements, Shortcomings and Errors of Einstein.
  30. Gullstrand (1921). Bibliography.
  31. C Lo (2012). Comments on the 2011 Shaw Prize in Mathematical Sciences, --an analysis of collectively formed errors in physics.
  32. C Lo,Richard Hui (2006). Comments on the invalid proof of Einstein on L = mc<sup>2</sup> and E = mc<sup>2</sup>.
  33. C Lo,S Yau (1982). Witten and Jones Receive Fields Medals for Physics-Related Work.
  34. C Lo (2017). An Open Letter to the International Mathematics Union on the Errors in the 1982 and 1990 Fields Medal Awards.
  35. C Lo (2006). The Gravity of Photons and the Necessary Rectification of Einstein Equation.
  36. C Lo (2011). Could Galileo be wrong?.
  37. C Lo (2014). The Unification of Gravitation and Electromagnetism and the Cause of the Pioneer Anomaly Discovered by NASA.
  38. C Lo (2013). Rectification of General Relativity, Experimental Verifications, and Errors of the Wheeler School.
  39. G Hooft (1999). A Confrontation with Infinity.
  40. Frank Wilczek (2004). Nobel Lecture: Asymptotic freedom: From paradox to paradigm.
  41. C Lo,C Richard,Hui (2018). Comments on the Invalid Proof of Einstein on L = mc 2 & E = mc 2.
  42. C Lo (2013). On the Nobel Prize in Physics, Controversies and Influences.
  43. Albert Einstein (1936). Physics and reality.
  44. H Lorentz (1916). Unknown Title.
  45. T Levi-Civita,R (1917). Unknown Title.
  46. A Einstein (1916). Unknown Title.
  47. Demetrios Christodoulou,Sergiu Klainerman (1993). The Global Nonlinear Stability of the Minkowski Space (PMS-41).
  48. C Lo (2000). The Question of Validity of the “Dynamic Solutions” Constructed by Christodoulou and Klainerman.
  49. Perlick Volker (1996). Unknown Title.
  50. L Okun (1989). The concept of mass (mass, energy, relativity).
  51. L Okun (2008). The Einstein formula: E 0 = mc 2 . "Isn't the Lord laughing?.
  52. R Wald (1984). General Relativity.
  53. H Bondi,F Pirani,I Robinson (1959). Gravitational waves in general relativity III. Exact plane waves.
  54. R Schoen,S.-T Yau (1981). Proof of the Positive Mass Theorem. II.
  55. Edward Witten (1981). A new proof of the positive energy theorem.
  56. L Herrera,N Santos,J Skea (2003). Unknown Title.
  57. Edmund Whittaker (1935). On Gauss' theorem and the concept of mass in general relativity.
  58. Richard Tolman (1930). On the Use of the Energy-Momentum Principle in General Relativity.
  59. C Lo (2011). Unknown Title.
  60. A Einstein,N Rosen (1937). On gravitational waves.
  61. Shahar Hod (2013). A SIMPLIFIED TWO-BODY PROBLEM IN GENERAL RELATIVITY.

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

c._y._lo. 2018. \u201cThe Measurements of Directional Dependence of Weight for Magnets\u201d. Global Journal of Science Frontier Research - A: Physics & Space Science GJSFR-A Volume 18 (GJSFR Volume 18 Issue A11): .

Download Citation

Issue Cover
GJSFR Volume 18 Issue A11
Pg. 1- 11
Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJSFR

Print ISSN 0975-5896

e-ISSN 2249-4626

Keywords
Classification
GJSFR-A Classification: FOR Code: 020107
Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

November 22, 2018

Language

English

Experiance in AR

The methods for personal identification and authentication are no exception.

Read in 3D

The methods for personal identification and authentication are no exception.

Article Matrices
Total Views: 2758
Total Downloads: 1456
2026 Trends
Research Identity (RIN)
Related Research

Article in Review

To explain the weight reduction of a charged capacitor and Einstein’s unification, it is necessary to confirm the existence of the repulsive charge-mass interaction and the attractive current-mass interaction. Therefore, to show the existence of the current-mass interaction, one must measure the effect of a small directional dependence of weight for a magnet, To do this, one must exclude the magnetic effect from the earth. In addition, one should avoid the influence of the magnet to the electronic scale for weighing. Here, we provide a method to measure and confirm such tiny effects of weight directional dependence experimentally. However, it is not effective to measure the small current-mass interaction directly. A problem is that a current must have a maintaining source unless in the super-conducting situation. Thus, this connection to the source would affect the measurements of the small current-mass interaction. Moreover, E = mc 2 is not always valid and Einstein failed his unification because, unlike Maxwell, he did not recognize that some additional interactions must be added to the original theories.

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]
×

This Page is Under Development

We are currently updating this article page for a better experience.

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

Quote and Order Details

Contact Person

Invoice Address

Notes or Comments

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

The Measurements of Directional Dependence of Weight for Magnets

C. Y. Lo
C. Y. Lo
Li Hua Wang
Li Hua Wang

Research Journals