Differences in Contrast-Enhanced CT Features Between Clear Cell Renal Carcinoma and Non- Clear Cell Renal Carcinoma

Article ID

867UV

Differences in Contrast-Enhanced CT Features Between Clear Cell Renal Carcinoma and Non- Clear Cell Renal Carcinoma

Shamim Ara
Shamim Ara
Noor Mohammad
Noor Mohammad Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China
Sayed Ismail
Sayed Ismail
De-xin Yu
De-xin Yu
Xiang-xing Ma
Xiang-xing Ma
DOI

Abstract

Purpose: Different RCC has different behavioral characteristics and their management protocol also different. Our purpose was to differentiate clear cell renal carcinoma from Non clear cell renal carcinoma with the help of contrast enhanced CT imaging features, which might help the clinician to make early decision about the management of renal cell carcinoma. Materials and methods: We retrospectively analyzed 64 patients (39 clear cell and 25 non clear cell) of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) from February, 2014 to February, 2016. We excluded 2 cases of angiomyolipoma and one case of oncocytoma because of their benign characteristics. So, total number of non- clear cell renal carcinoma was 22. Two radiologists retrospectively reviewed CT studies in an independent and blinded fashion. We compared Patient age and sex; tumor size; margin(clear or ill defined); location; presence or absence of hemorrhage, necrosis, calcification; degree of enhancement (hypodense, isodense or hyperdense) ; pattern of enhancement(homogenous or heterogeneous);tumor spreading pattern including presence or absence of thrombus (inferior vena cava and renal vein), lymphadenopathy, ascites. We performed statistical analysis with the help of SPSS 17.1 Software. Results: In corticomedullary phase, most of Clear cell RCC 21 of39 (53.8%) tended to show hyperdense enhancement, whereas, most of non- clear 21 of 22(95%) showed hypodensity and only 1 of 22(5%) showed isodensity. When, we compared homogeneity and heterogeneity in between two groups, we found non- clear RCCs(86%) were more heterogeneous than clear cell RCCS (53%)(P

Differences in Contrast-Enhanced CT Features Between Clear Cell Renal Carcinoma and Non- Clear Cell Renal Carcinoma

Purpose: Different RCC has different behavioral characteristics and their management protocol also different. Our purpose was to differentiate clear cell renal carcinoma from Non clear cell renal carcinoma with the help of contrast enhanced CT imaging features, which might help the clinician to make early decision about the management of renal cell carcinoma. Materials and methods: We retrospectively analyzed 64 patients (39 clear cell and 25 non clear cell) of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) from February, 2014 to February, 2016. We excluded 2 cases of angiomyolipoma and one case of oncocytoma because of their benign characteristics. So, total number of non- clear cell renal carcinoma was 22. Two radiologists retrospectively reviewed CT studies in an independent and blinded fashion. We compared Patient age and sex; tumor size; margin(clear or ill defined); location; presence or absence of hemorrhage, necrosis, calcification; degree of enhancement (hypodense, isodense or hyperdense) ; pattern of enhancement(homogenous or heterogeneous);tumor spreading pattern including presence or absence of thrombus (inferior vena cava and renal vein), lymphadenopathy, ascites. We performed statistical analysis with the help of SPSS 17.1 Software. Results: In corticomedullary phase, most of Clear cell RCC 21 of39 (53.8%) tended to show hyperdense enhancement, whereas, most of non- clear 21 of 22(95%) showed hypodensity and only 1 of 22(5%) showed isodensity. When, we compared homogeneity and heterogeneity in between two groups, we found non- clear RCCs(86%) were more heterogeneous than clear cell RCCS (53%)(P <0.05). ccRCC 15 of 39 (38.5%) usually located in middle pole whereas most of non- clear cell RCC 15 of 22 (68.2%) did not show any specific polarity predilection( P<0.05).33 of 39(84.6%) ccRCC involved medulla, whereas 20 of 22 (90.9%) non clear cell RCC showed mixed involvement of cortex, medulla and pelvis but no specific tendency to locate(P <0.05). Calcification was more commo

Shamim Ara
Shamim Ara
Noor Mohammad
Noor Mohammad Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China
Sayed Ismail
Sayed Ismail
De-xin Yu
De-xin Yu
Xiang-xing Ma
Xiang-xing Ma

No Figures found in article.

Noor Mohammad. 2017. “. Global Journal of Medical Research – D: Radiology, Diagnostic GJMR-D Volume 17 (GJMR Volume 17 Issue D1): .

Download Citation

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/gjmra

Print ISSN 0975-5888

e-ISSN 2249-4618

Classification
GJMR-D Classification: NLMC Code: QT 34
Keywords
Article Matrices
Total Views: 3526
Total Downloads: 1701
2026 Trends
Research Identity (RIN)
Related Research
Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

Quote and Order Details

Contact Person

Invoice Address

Notes or Comments

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

Differences in Contrast-Enhanced CT Features Between Clear Cell Renal Carcinoma and Non- Clear Cell Renal Carcinoma

Shamim Ara
Shamim Ara
Noor Mohammad
Noor Mohammad Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China
Sayed Ismail
Sayed Ismail
De-xin Yu
De-xin Yu
Xiang-xing Ma
Xiang-xing Ma

Research Journals