My Dashboard
Editorial Dashboard
Editorial Dashboard
Assessment Sheet
To start the assessment, first give a general rating to the paper. Rate the entire paper from 1 to 10. Your rating will depend on quality of paper, impact it may have, language and other parameters all at once.
How would you rate paper overall ?
To start the assessment, first give a general rating to the paper. Rate the entire paper from 1 to 10. Your rating will depend on quality of paper, impact it may have, language and other parameters all at once.
The Theme
As per your Section A rating and numerous other parameters we have used Artificial Intelligence to determine ratings for Section B. You may change them as per your analysis.
Integrity & Analysis of the Theme
How impactful is this Theme
Theme Analysis and Exploration
How author has analyzed and, explored the theme of the research?
Concept originality/Breakthrough
This does NOT refer to Plagiarism. This means how much enhanced in field author has made with respect to the previous referenced research
Presented Concept
This measures how much sufficiently novel is the article and has added new knowledge to the stream
How fundamental the concept is?
How close the concept is to the fundamental foundation or basis of the corresponding research in the stream? Given more mark if it is more fundamental.
Depth of the Research
The depth of theme and research work
The scope of stream
How is the article related to the scope of the stream?
Meaningful interpretation of the results
How logically has the author interpreted the results of the study
Logical Conclusions
Were any logical conclusions made by the author?
Relevance of the Article
How relevant is the research topic is with respect to the current needs in the stream ?
Extensibility of Research
Flexibility of Theory
The consistency of the conclusion with respect to the theory
Future aspects of Research
Whether the research topic is a hot topic of its stream
Flexibility of input data
If the results are consistent even if the input data is changed
Applications of Research
Direct impact of the research to industries
How much the research impacts directly to the industries for their betterment
Applications to interdisciplinary streams
How much is the research useful for multiple streams
Compatibility with local laws
It should not break any local laws, take US laws if unknown
Structural and Compilation Gradation of Article
Formatting is publisher's job, evaluation of the following is not based on the layout of the article.
Interactivity
Proper headings
How author has analyzed and explored theme of the research?
Figures and Photographs
Relevance of theme and no figure should lack captions
Charts and Tables
Properly and nicely formatted
High resolution of images
More than 600 DPI (Dot Per Inch). Means graphics must not be blurry
Aspect Ratio
The ratio of the width to the height of an image must be correct
Vector images in case of illustrative figures
If figures are not photographs, they must be in vector format
Title, Abstract and Keywords
Title
The title of the paper effectively frames the study
Contains specific data
It should be relevant and summary of whole article
Single paragraph
It should be only of single paragraph
250 words or less
250 words or less are considered better
Grammar and spelling
Scientific terminologies used are correct and consistent
Clear and concise
It should have good readability
Translated to English
Title, abstract and keywords should be in English also even if the article is non-English.
Keywords
Keywords should be used correctly and consistently
Introduction Section
Background
Background and history of the topic should be well summarized
Appropriate depth
It should go into the proper details
Goal clearly stated
What a reader should expect from the article should also be stated
References cited
Reference in standard format like APA
Transition and flow
Content in introduction should be connecting, logical, clear, easy to follow
Grammar and spelling
Semantic report is sent separately, still you can judge
Sentence/paragraph structure
Subheadings in Introduction Section
Material & Methods Section
Complete and Detailed
Method specified should be reproducible
Reference cited
References are given in a standard style. For example, APA
Correct format
Method should be well structured
Grammar and Spelling
Thorough semantic report is sent separately, still this parameter is judged
Sentence/paragraph structure
Separate subsections for material and procedure
Article Content
Appropriate length
Length of the article should neither be to long nor too short depending on the type of article (review/original)
Reference cited
References are given in a standard style in the whole article. For example, APA
Transition and flow
Article's contents should be connecting, logical, clear, easy to follow
Grammar and Spelling
Thorough semantic report is sent separately, still this parameter is judged for the whole article
Sentence/paragraph structure
Proper structure of the whole article
Results Section
If results section is not required, mark NR
Well organized results
Presentation of results section
Clear and concise
It should have good readability
Accuracy of results in prima facie
If result data looks correct
Standalone readability
Can anyone read results section without reading whole article ?
Grammar and Spelling
Semantic report is sent separately, still you can judge
Sentence/paragraph structure
Separate subsections for material and procedure
Discussion/Conclusion Section
Overall discussion
Conclusion, merits and demerits of the research should be clearly stated
Integration with theory
How is the conclusion related to the theory presented in the article
References cited in the comments section
Reference in standard format like APA
Concise and appropriate
Authors arrived at clear, well-supported and evidence-based conclusions
Logical conclusions
Conclusion deduced should be logically correct and obvious
Grammar and spelling
Thorough semantic report is sent separately, still this parameter is judged for the conclusion section
Dissenting arguments scope
Better if variance of expressed opinions with the tradition is high
Acknowledgements
Acknowledgement and conflict of interest should be stated
References/Bibliography
Literature Cited section should have complete citation information in standard format
To be Filled by Editor
Number of Authors
Less score when more than 5 authors
Author's credibility
To be judged by Editors
Corresponding author's country's contribution to research
Directly calculated by System
Comment and Recommendation
Comment
Your Recommendation
Select Reviewer
Assessment Sheet
To start the assessment, first give a general rating to the paper. Rate the entire paper from 1 to 10. Your rating will depend on quality of paper, impact it may have, language and other parameters all at once.
How would you rate paper overall ?
To start the assessment, first give a general rating to the paper. Rate the entire paper from 1 to 10. Your rating will depend on quality of paper, impact it may have, language and other parameters all at once.
The Theme
As per your Section A rating and numerous other parameters we have used Artificial Intelligence to determine ratings for Section B. You may change them as per your analysis.
Integrity & Analysis of the Theme
How impactful is this Theme
Theme Analysis and Exploration
How author has analyzed and, explored the theme of the research?
Concept originality/Breakthrough
This does NOT refer to Plagiarism. This means how much enhanced in field author has made with respect to the previous referenced research
Presented Concept
This measures how much sufficiently novel is the article and has added new knowledge to the stream
How fundamental the concept is?
HHow close the concept is to the fundamental foundation or basis of the corresponding research in the stream? Given more mark if it is more fundamental.
Depth of the Research
The depth of theme and research work
The scope of stream
How is the article related to the scope of the stream?
Meaningful interpretation of the results
How logically has the author interpreted the results of the study
Logical Conclusions
Were any logical conclusions made by the author?
Relevance of the Article
How relevant is the research topic is with respect to the current needs in the stream ?
Extensibility of Research
Flexibility of Theory
The consistency of the conclusion with respect to the theory
Future aspects of Research
Whether the research topic is a hot topic of its stream
Flexibility of input data
If the results are consistent even if the input data is changed
Applications of Research
Direct impact of the research to industries
How much the research impacts directly to the industries for their betterment
Applications to interdisciplinary streams
How much is the research useful for multiple streams
Compatibility with local laws
It should not break any local laws, take US laws if unknown
Structural and Compilation Gradation of Article
Formatting is publisher's job, evaluation of the following is not based on the layout of the article.
Interactivity
Proper headings
How author has analyzed and explored theme of the research?
Figures and Photographs
Relevance of theme and no figure should lack captions
Charts and Tables
Properly and nicely formatted
High resolution of images
More than 600 DPI (Dot Per Inch). Means graphics must not be blurry
Aspect Ratio
The ratio of the width to the height of an image must be correct
Vector images in case of illustrative figures
If figures are not photographs, they must be in vector format
Title, Abstract and Keywords
Title
The title of the paper effectively frames the study
Contains specific data
It should be relevant and summary of whole article
Single paragraph
It should be only of single paragraph
250 words or less
250 words or less are considered better
Grammar and spelling
Scientific terminologies used are correct and consistent
Clear and concise
It should have good readability
Translated to English
Title, abstract and keywords should be in English also even if the article is non-English.
Keywords
Keywords should be used correctly and consistently
Introduction Section
Background
Background and history of the topic should be well summarized
Appropriate depth
It should go into the proper details
Goal clearly stated
What a reader should expect from the article should also be stated
References cited
Reference in standard format like APA
Transition and flow
Content in introduction should be connecting, logical, clear, easy to follow
Grammar and spelling
Semantic report is sent separately, still you can judge
Sentence/paragraph structure
Subheadings in Introduction Section
Material & Methods Section
Complete and Detailed
Method specified should be reproducible
Reference cited
References are given in a standard style. For example, APA
Correct format
Method should be well structured
Grammar and Spelling
Thorough semantic report is sent separately, still this parameter is judged
Sentence/paragraph structure
Separate subsections for material and procedure
Article Content
Appropriate length
Length of the article should neither be to long nor too short depending on the type of article (review/original)
Reference cited
References are given in a standard style in the whole article. For example, APA
Transition and flow
Article's contents should be connecting, logical, clear, easy to follow
Grammar and Spelling
Thorough semantic report is sent separately, still this parameter is judged for the whole article
Sentence/paragraph structure
Proper structure of the whole article
Results Section
If results section is not required, mark NR
Well organized results
Presentation of results section
Clear and concise
It should have good readability
Accuracy of results in prima facie
If result data looks correct
Standalone readability
Can anyone read results section without reading whole article ?
Grammar and Spelling
Semantic report is sent separately, still you can judge
Sentence/paragraph structure
Separate subsections for material and procedure
Discussion/Conclusion Section
Overall discussion
Conclusion, merits and demerits of the research should be clearly stated
Integration with theory
How is the conclusion related to the theory presented in the article
References cited in the comments section
Reference in standard format like APA
Concise and appropriate
Authors arrived at clear, well-supported and evidence-based conclusions
Logical conclusions
Conclusion deduced should be logically correct and obvious
Grammar and spelling
Thorough semantic report is sent separately, still this parameter is judged for the conclusion section
Dissenting arguments scope
Better if variance of expressed opinions with the tradition is high
Acknowledgements
Acknowledgement and conflict of interest should be stated
References/Bibliography
Literature Cited section should have complete citation information in standard format
To be Filled by Reviewer
Number of Authors
Less score when more than 5 authors
Author's credibility
To be judged by Editors
Corresponding author's country's contribution to research
Directly calculated by System
Comment and Recommendation
Comment
Your Recommendation
