- Home
-
Board
- Editorial Board
- Apply For Reviewer
-
Research Publishing Standards
- Guidelines
- Peer Review Policy
- Short Guide to New Editors
- Retraction Guidelines
- Research Institute
- Recommendations for the Board of Directors
- Editor Research Audit and Service Assessments
- Guidelines for Journals Publishers
- Code of Conduct for Journal Publishers
- Commandment in Social Media
- Suggestions
- Authorship Disputes
- Rights and Responsibilities
- Editors Home
- Visibility
- Information
- Apply for Editorial
- About
- Call for Paper
- Research Community
-
Journals
- Computer Science
-
Medical Research
- A: Neurology & Nervous System
- B: Pharma, Drug Discovery, Toxicology & Medicine
- C: Microbiology & Pathology
- D: Radiology, Diagnostic Imaging and Instrumentation
- E: Gynecology & Obstetrics
- F: Diseasescancer, ophthalmology & pediatric
- G: Veterinary Science & Veterinary Medicine
- H: Orthopedic & Musculoskeletal System
- I: Surgeries & Cardiovascular System
- J: Dentistry & Otolaryngology
- K: Interdisciplinary
- L:Nutrition and Food Science
- Engineering
- Science Frontier Research
- Management
-
Human-Social Science
- A: Arts & Humanities psychology, public administration, library sciences, sports, arts, media, music
- B: Geography, Environmental Science & Disaster Management
- C: Sociology & Culture
- D: History, Archaeology & Anthropology
- E: Economics
- F: Political Science
- G: Linguistics & Education
- H: Interdisciplinary
-
Fellow
-
Support
Account
×
Measurement Models of Intellectal Capital for the Decision Making and Performance Variables
Caroline Rodrigues Vaz, Paula Regina Zarelli, Viviane Du00e2u20acu2122Brasoles Gonu00c3u00a7alves Werutsky, Paulo Mauricio Selig, Aran Bey Tcholakian Morales
Volume 15 Issue 1
Global Journal of Management and Business
Volume 15 Issue 1
Global Journal of Management and Business
This article aims in making a model review for measurement of intellectual capital for decision making. The construction of the present article was made through the bibliographic survey covering the Intellectual Capital theme addressing its objectives, peculiarities and definitions. It has been presented a classification of the methods from Sveiby’s (2011) perspective, as well as 30 models for evaluation of the Intellectual Capital. It can be concluded that the models differ by its application context, considered assets and set of indicators of measurement, for better decision making.
