- Home
-
Board
- Editorial Board
- Apply For Reviewer
-
Research Publishing Standards
- Guidelines
- Peer Review Policy
- Short Guide to New Editors
- Retraction Guidelines
- Research Institute
- Recommendations for the Board of Directors
- Editor Research Audit and Service Assessments
- Guidelines for Journals Publishers
- Code of Conduct for Journal Publishers
- Commandment in Social Media
- Suggestions
- Authorship Disputes
- Rights and Responsibilities
- Editors Home
- Visibility
- Information
- Apply for Editorial
- About
- Call for Paper
- Research Community
-
Journals
- Computer Science
-
Medical Research
- A: Neurology & Nervous System
- B: Pharma, Drug Discovery, Toxicology & Medicine
- C: Microbiology & Pathology
- D: Radiology, Diagnostic Imaging and Instrumentation
- E: Gynecology & Obstetrics
- F: Diseasescancer, ophthalmology & pediatric
- G: Veterinary Science & Veterinary Medicine
- H: Orthopedic & Musculoskeletal System
- I: Surgeries & Cardiovascular System
- J: Dentistry & Otolaryngology
- K: Interdisciplinary
- L:Nutrition and Food Science
- Engineering
- Science Frontier Research
- Management
-
Human-Social Science
- A: Arts & Humanities psychology, public administration, library sciences, sports, arts, media, music
- B: Geography, Environmental Science & Disaster Management
- C: Sociology & Culture
- D: History, Archaeology & Anthropology
- E: Economics
- F: Political Science
- G: Linguistics & Education
- H: Interdisciplinary
-
Fellow
-
Support
Account
×
On Database Relationships versus Mathematical Relations
Unfortunately, the widespread used one-to-many, many-to-one, one-to-one, and many-tomany database relationships lack precision and are very often leading to confusions that affect the quality of conceptual data modeling and database design. This paper advocates replacing them with the rigorous math notions of relations and (one-to-one) functions.
